Science

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

7. Kicked and recommended! nt

Reply to eridani (Original post)

Tue May 17, 2016, 07:11 AM

May 2016

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This scientist just changed how we think about climate change with one GIF [View all] eridani May 2016 OP

Brilliant! Bob Loblaw May 2016 #1

That is terrifying. SusanCalvin May 2016 #2

Looks like we are about to step things up a bit this year. Yeah us. n/t A Simple Game May 2016 #3

Wow yardwork May 2016 #4

You wish the headline to be true Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #5

I think they may be too busy dying to ask questions. It's gonna be a much different jtuck004 May 2016 #11

I meant -- ask them these days. Now. Hence the question is in future tense, to be asked now. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #14

I know, but it makes little difference. They are too busy with their texting and cell phones and jtuck004 May 2016 #18

It saddens me to see you only are critical of Republicons. The corporations have to make rhett o rick May 2016 #25

No. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #35

You can see it accelerating alfredo May 2016 #6

It's a trick (lying with graphs), though I think there is acceleration in the last 15 years. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #13

OK alfredo May 2016 #15

It's still linear. Just depicted in a circle... Beartracks May 2016 #29

No. Linear lines, not linear rate of change. It turns a linear rate into a squared 'geometric' rate. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #34

Do you think that once you actually see them? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #39

Nice example. Thx for posting. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #40

OK, so you're saying the 'equal radius' one is right, but you don't think we should use it? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #41

The point is real data has IRregular increments. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #42

You've agreed that there aren't 'perceptual overlays' for the linear radial plot muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #43

No, I have NOT agreed. Please read more carefully. I write carefully. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #44

" When the increments are regular, it is easy to assess as regular" muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #45

I wrote carefully. I carefully limited the ease of assessment to regular increments. ONLY. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #46

You started this sub-thread by stating they are 'lying with graphs' muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #47

Kicked and recommended! nt Enthusiast May 2016 #7

K&R.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #8

But God himself could come down and tell the tea baggers that, and it wouldn't do any good. forest444 May 2016 #9

Yes and these people don't mind getting to heaven a bit sooner. peace13 May 2016 #10

Are you saying that God can't stop it? Hell humans have only been on earth a very short time. rhett o rick May 2016 #26

Well her people experiment will be doomed. peace13 May 2016 #30

The world will be OK as soon JEB May 2016 #12

STOP BlancheSplanchnik May 2016 #16

+1 chknltl May 2016 #19

But...but...Sen. Inhofe tossed a snowball in the Senate! KansDem May 2016 #17

To the deniers, this will mean nothing MynameisBlarney May 2016 #20

The deniers who also don't understand math and graphs SCantiGOP May 2016 #21

They ain't exactly known MynameisBlarney May 2016 #38

There is a candidate who thinks this #1issue... chknltl May 2016 #22

God put the fossil fuels in the ground sulphurdunn May 2016 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #24

Very nice. BillZBubb May 2016 #27

I am convinced that there is nothing we can do to stop this. We are rhett o rick May 2016 #28

Even Nestle Corporation, Thespian2 May 2016 #31

Where is it going? 7962 May 2016 #32

Please note Thespian2 May 2016 #33

Wow jpmonk91 May 2016 #36

Chilling (well... I mean.... you know...) Recursion May 2016 #37