Science

muriel_volestrangler

(106,543 posts)

47. You started this sub-thread by stating they are 'lying with graphs'

Thu May 19, 2016, 04:00 AM

May 2016

I am arguing to show that you were mistaken about the linear scale being misleading, and to show you are wrong to accuse them of 'lying'. I don't want anyone to spread the misstatements you have made. You claim, illogically, that while a linear scale shows a regular increase fine, an irregular increase is somehow distorted. You advocated a different scale that you admit shows a regular increase badly, but think that any irregular increase will magically be shown clearly by it - no matter what the variation from regularity is, as far as I can tell.

If your multiple accusations of lying are 'careful writing', then you appear to be maliciously attacking the presentation of evidence of global warming. That would make it extremely important to continue to demonstrate how wrong you are.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This scientist just changed how we think about climate change with one GIF [View all] eridani May 2016 OP

Brilliant! Bob Loblaw May 2016 #1

That is terrifying. SusanCalvin May 2016 #2

Looks like we are about to step things up a bit this year. Yeah us. n/t A Simple Game May 2016 #3

Wow yardwork May 2016 #4

You wish the headline to be true Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #5

I think they may be too busy dying to ask questions. It's gonna be a much different jtuck004 May 2016 #11

I meant -- ask them these days. Now. Hence the question is in future tense, to be asked now. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #14

I know, but it makes little difference. They are too busy with their texting and cell phones and jtuck004 May 2016 #18

It saddens me to see you only are critical of Republicons. The corporations have to make rhett o rick May 2016 #25

No. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #35

You can see it accelerating alfredo May 2016 #6

It's a trick (lying with graphs), though I think there is acceleration in the last 15 years. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #13

OK alfredo May 2016 #15

It's still linear. Just depicted in a circle... Beartracks May 2016 #29

No. Linear lines, not linear rate of change. It turns a linear rate into a squared 'geometric' rate. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #34

Do you think that once you actually see them? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #39

Nice example. Thx for posting. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #40

OK, so you're saying the 'equal radius' one is right, but you don't think we should use it? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #41

The point is real data has IRregular increments. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #42

You've agreed that there aren't 'perceptual overlays' for the linear radial plot muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #43

No, I have NOT agreed. Please read more carefully. I write carefully. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #44

" When the increments are regular, it is easy to assess as regular" muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #45

I wrote carefully. I carefully limited the ease of assessment to regular increments. ONLY. Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #46

You started this sub-thread by stating they are 'lying with graphs' muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #47

Kicked and recommended! nt Enthusiast May 2016 #7

K&R.. disillusioned73 May 2016 #8

But God himself could come down and tell the tea baggers that, and it wouldn't do any good. forest444 May 2016 #9

Yes and these people don't mind getting to heaven a bit sooner. peace13 May 2016 #10

Are you saying that God can't stop it? Hell humans have only been on earth a very short time. rhett o rick May 2016 #26

Well her people experiment will be doomed. peace13 May 2016 #30

The world will be OK as soon JEB May 2016 #12

STOP BlancheSplanchnik May 2016 #16

+1 chknltl May 2016 #19

But...but...Sen. Inhofe tossed a snowball in the Senate! KansDem May 2016 #17

To the deniers, this will mean nothing MynameisBlarney May 2016 #20

The deniers who also don't understand math and graphs SCantiGOP May 2016 #21

They ain't exactly known MynameisBlarney May 2016 #38

There is a candidate who thinks this #1issue... chknltl May 2016 #22

God put the fossil fuels in the ground sulphurdunn May 2016 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj May 2016 #24

Very nice. BillZBubb May 2016 #27

I am convinced that there is nothing we can do to stop this. We are rhett o rick May 2016 #28

Even Nestle Corporation, Thespian2 May 2016 #31

Where is it going? 7962 May 2016 #32

Please note Thespian2 May 2016 #33

Wow jpmonk91 May 2016 #36

Chilling (well... I mean.... you know...) Recursion May 2016 #37