Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

Showing Original Post only (View all)

progressoid

(53,000 posts)
Thu Jun 9, 2016, 08:13 AM Jun 2016

Second layer of information in DNA confirmed [View all]

Leiden theoretical physicists have proven that DNA mechanics, in addition to genetic information in DNA, determines who we are. Helmut Schiessel and his group simulated many DNA sequences and found a correlation between mechanical cues and the way DNA is folded. They have published their results in PLoS One.

When James Watson and Francis Crick identified the structure of DNA molecules in 1953, they revealed that DNA information determines who we are. The sequence of the letters G, A, T and C in the famous double helix determines what proteins are made ny our cells. If you have brown eyes, for example, this is because a series of letters in your DNA encodes for proteins that build brown eyes. Each cell contains the exact same letter sequence, and yet every organ behaves differently. How is this possible?

Mechanical cues

Since the mid 1980s, it has been hypothesized that there is a second layer of information on top of the genetic code consisting of DNA mechanical properties. Each of our cells contains two meters of DNA molecules, and these molecules need to be wrapped up tightly to fit inside a single cell. The way in which DNA is folded determines how the letters are read out, and therefore which proteins are actually made. In each organ, only relevant parts of the genetic information are read. The theory suggests that mechanical cues within the DNA structures determine how preferentially DNA folds.

Simulation


For the first time, Leiden physicist Helmut Schiessel and his research group provide strong evidence that this second layer of information indeed exists. With their computer code, they have simulated the folding of DNA strands with randomly assigned mechanical cues. It turns out that these cues indeed determine how the DNA molecule is folded into so-called nucleosomes. Schiessel found correlations between the mechanics and the actual folding structure in the genome of two organisms—baker's yeast and fission yeast. This finding reveals evolutionary changes in DNA—mutations—that have two very different effects: The letter sequence encoding for a specific protein can change, or the mechanics of the DNA structure can change, resulting in different packaging and levels of DNA accessibility, and therefore differing frequency of production of that protein.


Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-06-layer-dna.html#jCp

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K & R ...... nt Wounded Bear Jun 2016 #1
Is this epigenetics or genetics? Regardless, epigenetics is as important as genetics. Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2016 #2
I do not think it is either. momto3 Jun 2016 #6
Origenetics Fumesucker Jun 2016 #8
I like yours better. momto3 Jun 2016 #9
Matryonetics. cstanleytech Jun 2016 #19
I think it is epigenetics. ArchTeryx Jun 2016 #10
I guess it may come down to semantics. momto3 Jun 2016 #18
You're absolutely right! ArchTeryx Jun 2016 #20
My understanding of ep[igenetics suggests that this is not epigenetic. Nitram Jun 2016 #12
Neither, but it does probably explain why Lamarck wasn't totally wrong. Yo_Mama Jun 2016 #24
It's genetics. This is about different codons that code for the same amino acid muriel_volestrangler Jun 2016 #27
I have read something similar a while ago about the genetic origins of homosexuality. DetlefK Jun 2016 #3
Wow, DNA origami! nt valerief Jun 2016 #4
Yeah! Nitram Jun 2016 #13
For some reason the article reminded me of the Inca language of knots denbot Jun 2016 #5
When do you get to lay down on a table for DNA repair? gordianot Jun 2016 #7
Wow, this is groundbreaking if it is confirmed. Nitram Jun 2016 #11
When you read articles like this I am amazed that - packman Jun 2016 #14
Could not agree more. It is astonishing that any of us are here at all! Moostache Jun 2016 #22
As usual.... AlbertCat Jun 2016 #15
Fascinating! Thanks for posting.....NT vkkv Jun 2016 #16
Well worth reading, AuntPatsy Jun 2016 #17
I used to volunteer my home computer to fold DNA for a group that applegrove Jun 2016 #21
I did the same thing with a PS3 a few years back. Moostache Jun 2016 #23
We did it!!! applegrove Jun 2016 #25
yes me too. drray23 Jun 2016 #26
fascinating! recommended! Bill USA Jun 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Second layer of informati...»Reply #0