Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Towlie

(5,324 posts)
3. That article logically contradicts itself.
Sun Aug 13, 2017, 11:36 AM
Aug 2017

The glasses are either safe or not safe. The article first says this:

How do you know if your eclipse glasses or handheld solar viewers are truly safe? You need to know that they meet the ISO 12312-2 (sometimes written as ISO 12312-2:2015) international safety standard. Filters that are ISO 12312-2 compliant not only reduce visible sunlight to safe and comfortable levels but also block solar UV and IR radiation.

Unfortunately, you can't check whether a filter meets the ISO standard yourself — doing so requires a specialized and expensive piece of laboratory equipment...


Then later it says what you quoted above:

How can you tell if your solar viewer is not safe? You shouldn't be able to see anything through a safe solar filter except the Sun itself or something comparably bright... (etc.)


This is a direct contradiction. First it says you need assurance that invisible wavelengths are blocked, then it says you can judge according to what's visible.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»I have some questions abo...»Reply #3