Science

Tomconroy

(7,611 posts)

39. The problem with many scientific papers is that

Wed Oct 13, 2021, 12:05 PM

Oct 2021

they are often so jargon filled and badly written as to be unintelligible to the lay reader.
But I appreciate your sharing your bias against journalism.
PS: Apparently you were too lazy to read the article.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Follow the Science: Lab Leak Is Most Likely [View all] pbmus Oct 2021 OP

WSJ Still Peddling The RightWing Propaganda WHITT Oct 2021 #1

Covid originated in the same city where the Wuhan Institute of Virology is Tomconroy Oct 2021 #2

Another coincidence, the lab had been studying the coronavirus for years. Irish_Dem Oct 2021 #9

Nope WHITT Oct 2021 #11

Link? Tomconroy Oct 2021 #13

Wrong Cite WHITT Oct 2021 #14

You need to read the whole article. Your claim does have Tomconroy Oct 2021 #17

YOU Need To Read The Whole Article WHITT Oct 2021 #20

You won't believe this one either: Tomconroy Oct 2021 #22

More Pooh-Poohing WHITT Oct 2021 #25

Beat you to it. Tomconroy Oct 2021 #27

Can't Access It WHITT Oct 2021 #33

Clearly you are going to believe what you believe Tomconroy Oct 2021 #36

WRONG WHITT Oct 2021 #40

Ahh! Secret Covid! Why didn't I think of that! Tomconroy Oct 2021 #44

Eh WHITT Oct 2021 #45

This is a LTE Dr. Shepper Oct 2021 #3

Precisely. SergeStorms Oct 2021 #8

The biggest problem in determining the source is that Chinese officials have erased the record and Ford_Prefect Oct 2021 #4

In criminal law we call these actions 'conciousness of guilt'. Tomconroy Oct 2021 #7

Tampering with evidence and witnesses points to guilt. Irish_Dem Oct 2021 #10

Except There's Nothing To 'Cover Up' WHITT Oct 2021 #12

Here's somebody who thinks they're hiding stuff: Tomconroy Oct 2021 #18

It is clear that something has been hidden. That is not proof of what happened. Ford_Prefect Oct 2021 #19

Ah WHITT Oct 2021 #21

Your metaphor is disingenuous. The government of China has a long and documented record of avoiding Ford_Prefect Oct 2021 #23

All Of Which WHITT Oct 2021 #24

Evidence? You can present it? or refer to it? Please enlighten us. Ford_Prefect Oct 2021 #26

Where Ya Been? WHITT Oct 2021 #35

There is significant doubt attached to the Spanish results suggesting a need for further examination Ford_Prefect Oct 2021 #38

Sure WHITT Oct 2021 #41

Is it 3 dimensional chess? Roy Rolling Oct 2021 #5

Trump also reversed the pause that Obama had ordered on this kind of research. Irish_Dem Oct 2021 #15

The New Yorker has a good article about this out this week. Tomconroy Oct 2021 #6

I am reading this article now. Jebus God. Irish_Dem Oct 2021 #16

Way too many coincidences. All paths lead back to the Wuhan Lab. Irish_Dem Oct 2021 #28

Yes. Just too many coincidences. Tomconroy Oct 2021 #31

Possibly the worst source of science news are journalists. NNadir Oct 2021 #29

What did the New Yorker article get wrong? Tomconroy Oct 2021 #30

One can answer this question oneself by being aware... NNadir Oct 2021 #32

Nice fluffy non-answer you've posted. No refence or suggestion of facts or opinion or a class Ford_Prefect Oct 2021 #34

I stand by what I wrote. If it's too "fluffy" for you, you have the option... NNadir Oct 2021 #37

The problem with many scientific papers is that Tomconroy Oct 2021 #39

Well if one does the hard work to understand what some people call... NNadir Oct 2021 #42

You've told us all about 'You' in your contributions to the thread, Tomconroy Oct 2021 #43