Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

EvolveOrConvolve

(6,452 posts)

8. I don't think there's a set time limit in the groups

Reply to rexcat (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 19, 2012, 08:50 PM

Feb 2012

The main forums only allow 90 day terms, but from what I've read the groups can make their own rules. Since it's not entirely clear, we're leaving it up to the group members.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should we have new host elections? [View all] laconicsax Feb 2012 OP

I do not think your terms need to be limited kdmorris Feb 2012 #1

If the current hosts want to contiune as hosts they should... rexcat Feb 2012 #2

As hosts, we'll go whichever way the group directs EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2012 #3

You handled the disrupters as they should have been handled... rexcat Feb 2012 #7

I don't think there's a set time limit in the groups EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2012 #8

If that is the case how about every 6 months and look at the issue again at the six month mark... rexcat Feb 2012 #10

LOL, if there's anyone who won't stab me in the back EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2012 #11

Well, no *true* atheist would.... nt mr blur Feb 2012 #15

No change is necessary IMO. Curmudgeoness Feb 2012 #4

We feel that it's important to let the group have a say in who runs the show. laconicsax Feb 2012 #5

We appreciate your asking. Thanks. nt Curmudgeoness Feb 2012 #6

No need for term limits. Atheists are natural cooperators and work well with others. dimbear Feb 2012 #9

Thank you for asking; enlightenment Feb 2012 #12

You don't need term limits. yellerpup Feb 2012 #13

I read here more than I post JNelson6563 Feb 2012 #14

Happy to keep things as they are with you three mr blur Feb 2012 #16

Having viewed the horror of an unplanned succession.... PassingFair Feb 2012 #17

If it's not broken, don't fix it. frogmarch Feb 2012 #18

no need for term limits, but lazarus Feb 2012 #19

Agree with lazarus. onager Feb 2012 #20

Why a slush fund instead of a super PAC? laconicsax Feb 2012 #21

Voting is now closed. laconicsax Feb 2012 #22