Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atheists & Agnostics

(6,271 posts)

9. No need for term limits. Atheists are natural cooperators and work well with others.

Sun Feb 19, 2012, 08:53 PM

Feb 2012

Comes from believing in evolution. And you moderator folks are doing a good job.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Should we have new host elections? [View all] laconicsax Feb 2012 OP

I do not think your terms need to be limited kdmorris Feb 2012 #1

If the current hosts want to contiune as hosts they should... rexcat Feb 2012 #2

As hosts, we'll go whichever way the group directs EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2012 #3

You handled the disrupters as they should have been handled... rexcat Feb 2012 #7

I don't think there's a set time limit in the groups EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2012 #8

LOL, if there's anyone who won't stab me in the back EvolveOrConvolve Feb 2012 #11

Well, no *true* atheist would.... nt mr blur Feb 2012 #15

No change is necessary IMO. Curmudgeoness Feb 2012 #4

We appreciate your asking. Thanks. nt Curmudgeoness Feb 2012 #6

Thank you for asking; enlightenment Feb 2012 #12

You don't need term limits. yellerpup Feb 2012 #13

I read here more than I post JNelson6563 Feb 2012 #14

Happy to keep things as they are with you three mr blur Feb 2012 #16

Having viewed the horror of an unplanned succession.... PassingFair Feb 2012 #17

If it's not broken, don't fix it. frogmarch Feb 2012 #18

no need for term limits, but lazarus Feb 2012 #19

Agree with lazarus. onager Feb 2012 #20

Why a slush fund instead of a super PAC? laconicsax Feb 2012 #21

Voting is now closed. laconicsax Feb 2012 #22