Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: What happened to Howard Dean? [View all]bvf
(6,604 posts)7. Never thought I'd get a chance to post this...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
162 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's not his opposition. He is a centrist. (See Reply 52.) He makes money and stays relevant
merrily
Jan 2016
#54
Quite a few years ago I heard his son, Skip (Hubert, III) say that his father had
dflprincess
Jan 2016
#121
I am not so sure about Humphrey's loyalty to LBJ, as opposed to Humphrey's loyalty to
merrily
Jan 2016
#122
I would not even believe Humphrey himself if he told me he knew only lies, let alone
merrily
Jan 2016
#147
So, repeating what you posted umpteen posts ago is all you've got? I thought so.
merrily
Jan 2016
#161
It is who he has been all along. Please see Reply 52 and the post linked in it.
merrily
Jan 2016
#66
Even if that one poster were a Sanders' supporter, your comment would have been unfair.
merrily
Jan 2016
#129
I thought the New Democrat motto was "Forward." Maybe it's really "Stand Still" or "Regress?"
merrily
Jan 2016
#72
You keep on fighting against single payer. 'K? If it ever happens, you will get ZERO credit.
stillwaiting
Jan 2016
#24
You ABSOLUTELY are fighting against single payer. You are telling everyone who will listen that it
stillwaiting
Jan 2016
#29
We have to restructure our entire health care system. Now tell me it can't be done.
stillwaiting
Jan 2016
#46
Poster, please. Pols and their shills are hitting SBS on everything, not just this.
merrily
Jan 2016
#99
You've seen plenty, but you're dedicated to objecting to everything Bernie says or proposes
Scootaloo
Jan 2016
#71
Thanks. Employer plans were the Nixon proposal in 1974, forty-one years ago. Time for something more
merrily
Jan 2016
#90
Put payment decisions in the hands of Congress, as opposed to the hands of private insurers?
merrily
Jan 2016
#102
In the countries with universal coverage, the plans are much more robust compared to what we offer.
stillwaiting
Jan 2016
#114
Dean was never a progressive. Search DU for the many posts by joshcryer saying that and see
merrily
Jan 2016
#67
See Reply 72. Maybe you (New Democrats) take some of the time, energy, bandwidth and air time
merrily
Jan 2016
#74
My respect for Howard Dean dropped when he said there shouldn't mosques near WTC.
Eric J in MN
Jan 2016
#14
He's a pragmatic progressive. Probably comes from actually running a fucking state.
Gidney N Cloyd
Jan 2016
#21
How long since Howard Dean held a real position other than DNC head which he was replaced
appalachiablue
Jan 2016
#91
Forget that, Dean's a lobbyist/advisor for a major public policy firm that works
appalachiablue
Jan 2016
#116
Maybe from being born into a Wall Street family with a pied a terre on Park Avenue and loving him
merrily
Jan 2016
#103
running a fucking state right next door to a working 1payer healthcare system, that is
MisterP
Jan 2016
#124
Dean was never really progressive, it's just that by being strongly anti Iraq war
jfern
Jan 2016
#25
BINGO. Makes me wonder if he was ever really against the Iraq War or if he simply thought
merrily
Jan 2016
#105
"What happened to Howard Dean?" is the question that might have been asked in 2004
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2016
#30
imho Dea never pretended to be anything he wasn't. However a lot of people projected their own views
emulatorloo
Jan 2016
#33
I agree. IN 2004 I sort of supported him - because he was the most visable candidate
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2016
#42
Must be some money somewhere for him in the deal, or a cabinet position perhaps?
jalan48
Jan 2016
#75
He was faking it, just like Hill is now, manipulating us with fake Populism
RiverLover
Jan 2016
#134