Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 03:35 PM Jan 2016

Student describes how she became a Clinton Plant - Why is this Town Hall even taking place? [View all]

GRINNELL, Iowa (CNN) -- The college student who was told what question to ask at one of New York Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign events said "voters have the right to know what happened" and she wasn't the only one who was planted.
Student Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff said a staffer told her what to ask at a campaign event for Sen. Hillary Clinton.

In an exclusive on-camera interview with CNN, Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff, a 19-year-old sophomore at Grinnell College in Grinnell, Iowa, said giving anyone specific questions to ask is "dishonest," and the whole incident has given her a negative outlook on politics.

Gallo-Chasanoff, whose story was first reported in the campus newspaper, said what happened was simple: She said a senior Clinton staffer asked if she'd like to ask the senator a question after an energy speech the Democratic presidential hopeful gave in Newton, Iowa, on November 6.

"I sort of thought about it, and I said 'Yeah, can I ask how her energy plan compares to the other candidates' energy plans?'" Gallo-Chasanoff said Monday night.
According to Gallo-Chasanoff, the staffer said, " 'I don't think that's a good idea, because I don't know how familiar she is with their plans.' " Watch the student speak out about question »

He then opened a binder to a page that, according to Gallo-Chasanoff, had about eight questions on it.

"The top one was planned specifically for a college student," she added. "It said 'college student' in brackets and then the question."

Topping that sheet of paper was the following: "As a young person, I'm worried about the long-term effects of global warming. How does your plan combat climate change?" Watch the student ask the planted question »

And while she said she would have rather used her own question, Gallo-Chasanoff said she didn't have a problem asking the campaign's because she "likes to be agreeable," adding that since she told the staffer she'd ask their pre-typed question she "didn't want to go back on my word."

Clinton campaign spokesman Mo Elleithee said, "This is not acceptable campaign process moving forward. We've taken steps to ensure that it never happens again." Elleithee said Clinton had "no idea who she was calling on."

Gallo-Chasanoff wasn't so sure.

"I don't know whether Hillary knew what my question was going to be, but it seemed like she knew to call on me because there were so many people, and ... I was the only college student in that area," she said.

In a separate statement in response to the campus article, the campaign said, "On this occasion a member of our staff did discuss a possible question about Sen. Clinton's energy plan at a forum. ... This is not standard policy and will not be repeated again."
Gallo-Chasanoff said she wasn't the only person given a question.

"After the event," she said, "I heard another man ... talking about the question he asked, and he said that the campaign had asked him to ask that question."

The man she referenced prefaced his question by saying that it probably didn't have anything to do with energy, and then posed the following: "I wonder what you propose to do to create jobs for the middle-class person, such as here in Newton where we lost Maytag."

A Maytag factory in Newton recently closed, forcing hundreds of people out of their jobs.
During the course of the late-night interview on Grinnell's campus, Gallo-Chasanoff also said that the day before the school's newspaper, Scarlet and Black, printed the story, she wanted the reporter to inform the campaign out of courtesy to let them know it would be published.

She said the "head of publicity for the campaign," a man whose name she could not recall, had no factual disputes with the story. But, she added, a Clinton intern spoke to her to say the campaign requested she not talk about the story to any more media outlets and that if she did she should inform a staffer.

"I'm not under any real obligation to do that, and I haven't talked to [the campaign] anymore," Gallo-Chasanoff said, adding that she doesn't plan to.

"If what I do is come and just be totally truthful, then that's all anyone can ask of me, and that's all I can ask of myself. So I'll feel good with what I've done. I'll feel like I've done the right thing."

The Clinton campaign's acknowledgment that it planted a question reinforces a widely held criticism of the senator -- that she is not entirely honest, said Bill Schneider, CNN's senior political analyst.
"It's the same criticism often made of her husband," Schneider said. "Most Americans never felt Bill Clinton was honest and trustworthy, even when he got elected in 1992 -- with only 43 percent of the vote. His critics called him 'Slick Willy.' ... Will her critics start referring to the New York senator as 'Slick Hillary?' "

Asked if this experience makes her less likely to support Clinton's presidential bid, Gallo-Chasanoff, an undecided voter, said, "I think she has a lot to offer, but I -- this experience makes me look at her campaign a little bit differently."

"The question and answer sessions -- especially in Iowa -- are really important. That's where the voters get to ... have like a real genuine conversation with this politician who could be representing them."

While she acknowledged "it's possible that all campaigns do these kind of tactics," she said that doesn't make it right.

"Personally I want to know that I have someone who's honest representing me."

A second person has a story similar to Gallo-Chasanoff's. Geoffrey Mitchell of Hamilton, Illinois, on the Iowa border, said the Clinton campaign wanted him to ask a certain question at an Iowa event in April.

"He asked me if I would ask Sen. Clinton about ways she was going to confront the president on the war in Iraq, specifically war funding," said Geoffrey Mitchell, a supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois. "I told him it was not a question I felt comfortable with."

No questions were taken at the event. Elleithee said this incident was different from what happened with Gallo-Chasanoff in Newton. Elleithee said the staffer "bumped into someone he marginally knew" and during a conversation with Mitchell, "Iraq came up." Elleithee denied the campaign tried to plant him as a friendly questioner in the audience.

Mitchell said he had never met the staffer before the event.

Former presidential adviser David Gergen said the front-runner's campaign could take a hit from the incident.

"When a campaign plants a question, it's a pretty minor infraction of the rules -- like a parking ticket," Gergen said. "The problem here is it feeds a damaging perception of Hillary Clinton that she can't quite be trusted."

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/clinton.planted/


137 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There you have it. A blast from a lying past! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #1
PSS, don't even care if he drew the short straw. None of this should be going on. Fuck DWS! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #2
Sanders agreed to it. He is obviously confident he will do well, you should be as well. Agschmid Jan 2016 #3
That's what I'd say too. Too many paragraphs saying bad things about Hillary! cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #4
"Too many paragraphs saying bad things about Hillary!" left-of-center2012 Jan 2016 #62
Not even close to what I said. Agschmid Jan 2016 #95
It is hard to stuff all Hillary's baggage, dirty politics, and dirty laundry bvar22 Jan 2016 #134
It's a good article, and it's fairly damaging against hilliary. Bubzer Jan 2016 #128
She works for corporations. Madmiddle Jan 2016 #130
Your point is insignificant. He'll do well anywhere. It's the process...not the Gotcha. libdem4life Jan 2016 #36
Guess all you want you have no idea what I'd be saying/thinking. Agschmid Jan 2016 #54
"Supporters" "worried" aren't supporters at all. joshcryer Jan 2016 #50
I guess it's not PC to be worried. Nitram Jan 2016 #126
So this is all you got from the OP? A 4 paragraph copyright rule? Sigh! Duval Jan 2016 #60
No. Agschmid Jan 2016 #93
...but hey it happens." bvar22 Jan 2016 #92
What type of electronics device are you using to post on DU? Agschmid Jan 2016 #94
Ducking and Diving again? bvar22 Jan 2016 #96
No making a point. Agschmid Jan 2016 #97
You have no point. bvar22 Jan 2016 #135
No fumble by me. Agschmid Jan 2016 #136
Of course he would do well. That isn't the point, the point is that the DNC under DWS sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #110
Bernie doesn't seem worried about it... Agschmid Jan 2016 #111
If Bernie said he was worried about it, you'd say he was whining & playing victim. nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #122
No *I* wouldn't. Some would... I wouldn't be one of them. Agschmid Jan 2016 #123
Apparently he has been very concerned about it. As would be expected. Bernie isn't about just HIM sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #137
ha ha. Why bring Sanders inot something that happened in 2007>???? riversedge Jan 2016 #14
I wish Sanders supporters would post more positive threads about their candidate Beaverhausen Jan 2016 #17
Apparently, you don't read my posts. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #18
Ha! SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #21
+1 Duval Jan 2016 #61
That's great. I see only one on the front page of this forum Beaverhausen Jan 2016 #22
Then write your own OP. nt artislife Jan 2016 #80
They don't read them because they don't care. draa Jan 2016 #31
I have posted lots of posts discussing issues only to have HRC supporters ignore them. rhett o rick Jan 2016 #109
History Tends To Repeat Itself.. Hillary Cannot Help Herself! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #102
Can't be trusted? Duckfan Jan 2016 #113
It is kind of odd Clinton goes last, the prime spot, and gets center stage at all the debates... EndElectoral Jan 2016 #25
That's because she is ahead in all the national polls...n/t asuhornets Jan 2016 #67
It's because DWS and the DNC are trying to tilt the scales for Hillary peacebird Jan 2016 #69
So you're going BACK almost a DECADE AGO?!? *sigh* 66 dmhlt Jan 2016 #120
"...she can't quite be trusted." tazkcmo Jan 2016 #5
Correct. and history matters, in this case - herstory matters Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #20
The last thing they'll ever call her is "Slick Hillary" tularetom Jan 2016 #6
More like Huckster Hillary. cui bono Jan 2016 #10
Or Bad Bad JuJu Jan 2016 #116
I disagree with Gergen perpetrating a fraud on the American People to warp their perceptions Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #7
+1,000,000!!! cui bono Jan 2016 #75
Yup. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #117
2007? Beaverhausen Jan 2016 #8
Otherwise known as the last time Hillary ran a Presidential primary campaign. stillwaiting Jan 2016 #76
Why Hillary? Why? It's shit like this that could cost us the election if she is the nominee. jillan Jan 2016 #9
From 2007? Pretty sure that town hall isn't taking place anytime soon. JTFrog Jan 2016 #11
If it happened before how do we know it hasn't happened again in this run? KoKo Jan 2016 #16
More made up vile conspiracy theories from the Sanders camp. Nothing new. But shameful. riversedge Jan 2016 #24
Good lawd...vile conspiracy theories. That she doesn't take questions from a crowd? libdem4life Jan 2016 #37
Exactly. And above you, the only shameful thing was Hillary's cheating in the last race Town Hall! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #71
Made up? Conspiracy? cui bono Jan 2016 #77
Clinton campaign spokesman Mo Elleithee said, "This is not acceptable campaign process moving in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #12
By "process" she means that whole bit about getting caught Android3.14 Jan 2016 #41
:) in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #78
Jury results (2-5). I was juror #4. Electric Monk Jan 2016 #13
Cute how they so often alert on OPs criticizing Hillary. senz Jan 2016 #19
Can't detail Hillary's past history either, John Poet Jan 2016 #28
It's as if they wanted to "slip her in" under cover senz Jan 2016 #35
THANK you. John Poet Jan 2016 #40
Whow-you are bragging that you use the jury system to further your own candidates advancement. Whow riversedge Jan 2016 #32
The alerter's attempt to abuse the jury system to censor information about THEIR candidate backfired Electric Monk Jan 2016 #39
You are one bragging that you abuse the DU jury system. And you distracted by riversedge Jan 2016 #48
I think you are viewing it through your hyper-partisan lens and are not objective in the least. nt Electric Monk Jan 2016 #52
I didn't see the abuse. Gore1FL Jan 2016 #53
Wrong. The alert was to advance Hillary by silencing her critics. senz Jan 2016 #42
I guess the obvious question is did it really really happen? Lots of innuendo from NINE years ago! George II Jan 2016 #15
How can history not matter to those who try to change it? ViseGrip Jan 2016 #23
Not surprised by pre-screened questions at her own event,but at a group TownHall would be a shocker. EndElectoral Jan 2016 #26
Clinton: detached from reality, can't even face a 19 year old student. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #27
The tactic boils down to this: if you can plant enough questions John Poet Jan 2016 #29
pffft,no shit? I never did trust this last minute wendylaroux Jan 2016 #30
Yup, this is going to be quite the test. Karma13612 Jan 2016 #98
And you think this is a new thing, why? Hekate Jan 2016 #33
K+R!!! draa Jan 2016 #34
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #38
Just a thought about slick Hillary. I like slippery Hillary myself. eom Cleita Jan 2016 #43
this is disappointing... and it's also from 2007 renate Jan 2016 #44
Thom is great, but it will be with much heart ache that I cast my vote for her, if that's what I Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #59
Thank you. Attacks like this won't help us as a party pnwmom Jan 2016 #87
I was unable to pull up a date on this article. Why doesn't it show up on the site? Peregrine Took Jan 2016 #101
It's not good, but why did you have to use a 2007 story? book_worm Jan 2016 #45
Because these ARE her tactics. History must count, if you want to change it. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #47
Ambush attempt! Helen Borg Jan 2016 #46
Keep kicking! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #49
Certainly explains how any discussion re: marijuana legalization "magically" gets derailed by Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #51
Intersesting and true. Marijuana should have made it into the discussion and it did not. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #55
She sure has no idea of what's going on a lot 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #56
ARGH! Well, can't deny this says a lot about her campaign methods. Duval Jan 2016 #57
Here's hoping it turns around and bites them. n /t Skwmom Jan 2016 #58
This Is Just Wrong and Immoral..... global1 Jan 2016 #63
Agree, it's immoral. Kick this to the 100 club! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #64
three dollar hill reddread Jan 2016 #65
The night of the Town Hall, I will donate to Bernie Sanders, again! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #66
LOL mhatrw Jan 2016 #68
Exactly why she "does so well at these types of events". So let's put one together cuz she's losing. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #70
Bernie has integrity and good judgment. Hillary, not so much! TryLogic Jan 2016 #72
Oh well. It's a blocked from public debate once again anyway. Only repubicans open up to all viewers ViseGrip Jan 2016 #73
one thing that will help is social media restorefreedom Jan 2016 #74
And to further put this "plant" situation into context CoffeeCat Jan 2016 #79
This story is from 2007. To put it into further context. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #81
Again, don't ignore history and act like you want to change it. History of her untrustworthiness! ViseGrip Jan 2016 #84
In 2007 Bernie was voting against gun control. Again. Don't ignore history pnwmom Jan 2016 #85
I think we're all aware of that (nt) CoffeeCat Jan 2016 #100
While I believe this still may happen Lage Nom Ai Jan 2016 #82
This is from 2007. What was Bernie doing in 2007? Voting against gun control, as usual. pnwmom Jan 2016 #83
Oh, he was doing more that an that. Bernie has cali Jan 2016 #86
Why would you ignore history, and act like you want to change it? History of CHEATING HERE.... ViseGrip Jan 2016 #89
Why would you ignore Bernie's history of gun control votes pnwmom Jan 2016 #91
Just watching my local news xloadiex Jan 2016 #88
icky icky ElliotCarver Jan 2016 #90
In 90 minutes, some Hillary supporters will ask her and Bernie some questions designed to help her jfern Jan 2016 #99
Well do you see now? Cumo talked to Bernie most of the time, O'Malley gets to go on and on.... ViseGrip Jan 2016 #103
Madam Pantsuit likes it scripted and controlled. One reason she has an email problem. jalan48 Jan 2016 #104
The kids see it too. The question/statement we think you're dishonest. She yelled at him. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #105
I remember this story from the 2008 campaign well. The local media in Iowa turned it into Watergate. StevieM Jan 2016 #106
This time it will be her continued dishonesty, like saying she was under enemy fire, on and on. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #107
I'm sorry you think so little of somebody who I admire so much. StevieM Jan 2016 #108
knr nt retrowire Jan 2016 #112
I would have said: Mdm Secretary, your staff wanted me to ask you ...... and then see what happens. YOHABLO Jan 2016 #114
problem... TammyMintonHaley Jan 2016 #125
I was a Future Farmer of America in High School and appeared on Agriculture USA, a TV program AnotherDreamWeaver Jan 2016 #115
Nixon Too 1norcal Jan 2016 #118
Only in Camp Sanders Tarc Jan 2016 #119
This message was self-deleted by its author gordyfl Jan 2016 #121
wtf?!? TammyMintonHaley Jan 2016 #124
Planting seems accepted tactic now HassleCat Jan 2016 #127
Suddenly Clinton ain't quite so smart as we are lead to believe. Madmiddle Jan 2016 #129
K&R emsimon33 Jan 2016 #131
No Matter How You Want To Support This Or Whether This ChiciB1 Jan 2016 #132
^^^this^^^ ViseGrip Jan 2016 #133
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Student describes how she...»Reply #0