2016 Postmortem

jillan

(39,451 posts)

88. Oh I think that went both ways! All of the sudden in Dec I started getting email & mail from Hillary

Reply to Dawson Leery (Reply #2)

Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:01 AM

Jan 2016

I never signed up! How did she get my email address AND my home address? I sure didn't give it to them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

153 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton's FIREWALL Starts To Crumble [View all] Segami Jan 2016 OP

Sandblasted. n/t Wilms Jan 2016 #1

The only firewall I�m aware of the Sanders Campaign breaking... Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #2

Another dishonest post from a Clinton supporter. Why am I not Shocked? Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #8

That poster KNOWS it is a Lie. bvar22 Jan 2016 #150

Good thing it wasn't Hillary's illegal private email server. John Poet Jan 2016 #9

Right. We're discovering that it had many work arounds known to just a few. libdem4life Jan 2016 #21

If there were work arounds, trust me, any competent hacker could get through. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #52

Very true. Thus, the issue may be very much bigger than we can imagine. I believe libdem4life Jan 2016 #55

he did not absolve her, he said there is an ongoing investigation that will go where it goes questionseverything Jan 2016 #96

In their political battle for Presidency he DID. He said, enough about the emails. libdem4life Jan 2016 #97

during the debate he did say..enough of the e-mails but questionseverything Jan 2016 #100

I didn't see that, but it's not like everybody doesn't know and if it's conveniently put off libdem4life Jan 2016 #104

it is definitely on going mess for the dems questionseverything Jan 2016 #106

and try to wipe their own and other's servers...not a chance. libdem4life Jan 2016 #107

badda boom! badda Bing! Champion Jack Jan 2016 #86

And it was Special Access Program stuff found too VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #91

Well played! hrmjustin Jan 2016 #11

You're Misinformed...Again billhicks76 Jan 2016 #35

How so? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #38

Bernie's staff didn't hack through the firewall. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #53

That's right they did not hack it. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #54

And coincidentally just days after the "breach" Sanders started gaining in NH, Iowa, and.... George II Jan 2016 #58

But they said they did not download the information. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #60

LMAO! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #62

That's all you've got? George II Jan 2016 #79

"How come is that?"? bvf Jan 2016 #92

I laughed at that ridiculous conspiracy theory the first time they floated it here. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #93

Truly. bvf Jan 2016 #94

If you're referring to the data breach by the Sanders campaign, it's not a "conspiracy theory"..... George II Jan 2016 #112

It's a bus load of fail Mnpaul Jan 2016 #123

Grasping at straws, they just can't believe Bernie is THAT popular. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #124

You seem to be full of questions. Interesting. George II Jan 2016 #109

Yes, questions are bad bvf Jan 2016 #116

...and NOW the "excuses" for Hillary's Big Fail start to appear. bvar22 Jan 2016 #101

Just like 2008. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #103

Dog whistle? You throw that term around a lot. What in your frame of reference is a........ George II Jan 2016 #110

lmgtfy.com beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #111

Once again, that's all you've got? George II Jan 2016 #113

You mean once again your attempt to get someone to post a link that will result in a hide failed? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #114

Ah, here we go again dwelling on something taken OUT OF CONTEXT from another site. And.... George II Jan 2016 #118

Explain how accusing Bernie of being funded by Israel isn't anti-Semitic? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #119

The fact is that the statement you're referring to (which is what, about six months old now?).... George II Jan 2016 #121

Don't be coy, they accused him of having a "nest egg" in Israel. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #122

No "they" didn't. No one accused Sanders of having a "nest egg" in Israel. NO ONE! George II Jan 2016 #125

What? Many DUers (and Manny DUers) saw it, including me. merrily Jan 2016 #127

Then what were all of those DUers so angry about? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #128

Why are you asking me? I don't know, ask them. George II Jan 2016 #130

Woopsie! There it is: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #131

Riiiiiight George. polly7 Jan 2016 #129

So where is the accusation that he's got a nest egg in Israel? HUH? Nowhere! George II Jan 2016 #132

Can't you read ?? nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #133

I read perfectly, you? George II Jan 2016 #135

Yeah, I read just fine. polly7 Jan 2016 #136

Right here: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #139

As I asked Polly, where is the accusation that Sanders has a nest egg in Israel? NOWHERE! George II Jan 2016 #134

I am Polly. I answered you. nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #137

"I knew there has to be a connect between israel and Sanders" beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #140

Let me transcribe that: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #138

Not at all. How you arrive at "not in a bank in Vermont" means Israel is subjective projection. George II Jan 2016 #142

Because he specifically said TIES TO ISRAEL. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #144

Yes George. Sanders was accused of having a "nest egg" in Israel. A screen shot was taken Autumn Jan 2016 #141

No, totally false, and the screen shot has been posted here, it says nothing of the kind! George II Jan 2016 #143

TIES TO ISRAEL/NEST EGG/I KNEW THERE HAD TO BE A CONNECT beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #145

Did you read it from top to bottom? polly7 Jan 2016 #146

You don't see "Bernie's got a nice retirement nest egg waiting for him & it's not in a bank in VT? Autumn Jan 2016 #147

George? polly7 Jan 2016 #148

Cuz Bernie is so awesome all he needs is 45 minutes worth of data to take down HHS Hillary Kalidurga Jan 2016 #76

He had FOUR guys trolling Clinton's data for a total of four hours and 26 minutes. George II Jan 2016 #78

Well this is still pretty impressive. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #81

Sorry, they "haven't taken down Hillary", she's still standing proudly and will STILL get.... George II Jan 2016 #83

Well you have a few more days to hold onto the dream. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #85

How come is that? bvar22 Jan 2016 #149

Actually, they were handed it. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #59

Lol handed it! hrmjustin Jan 2016 #61

No -that's the only interpretation. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #64

Really? The only interpretation? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #67

Good luck with that. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #69

Then why did he apologize and fire his staffers? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #70

Dogmatic myopia often compels us to deny additional possibilities. LanternWaste Jan 2016 #95

Yeah, "they were handed it". Sorry, that's not how it works. George II Jan 2016 #80

That CEO Is A Close Family Friend Of The Clintons billhicks76 Jan 2016 #82

Yeah, if a bank manager forgets to lock the front door of the branch at night and... George II Jan 2016 #120

You're the only one left whispering such tripe... Segami Jan 2016 #14

Indeed KingFlorez Jan 2016 #15

Psst! Probably not a good idea to bring up internet security when discussing Hillary. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #16

I love how quick your mind is. pangaia Jan 2016 #39

Hey back atcha! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #40

There's nothing wrong... scscholar Jan 2016 #49

Nonsensical? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #51

The hipocracy is mind-numbing. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #63

Right? And they're still blaming Hillary's loss in the polls on the BREACH! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #65

I'll tell you this, if that increase in his poll numbers is as a result Fawke Em Jan 2016 #68

Ha ha that's what I told the first conspiracy theorist I saw. Kalidurga Jan 2016 #77

LMAO Perfect. Ivan Kaputski Jan 2016 #89

Not to worry...you will be aware soon. It got postponed conveniently for a month. libdem4life Jan 2016 #24

You know what really bothers me (besides the obvious unconcern for security)? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #56

Me, too. She has a delightful energy about her...only saw her once. libdem4life Jan 2016 #57

My first husband is Palestinian and a non-practicing Muslim. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #66

You're a regular United Nations there...LOL...yes, I thought so too. libdem4life Jan 2016 #71

You sound very INdemo Jan 2016 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author INdemo Jan 2016 #28

BS billhicks76 Jan 2016 #34

More Clintonite Dishonesty billhicks76 Jan 2016 #37

Not so fast ashling Jan 2016 #41

Thank you!! NurseJackie Jan 2016 #43

Good one!!! asuhornets Jan 2016 #50

Oh I think that went both ways! All of the sudden in Dec I started getting email & mail from Hillary jillan Jan 2016 #88

you let me know who stole his info first PatrynXX Jan 2016 #90

Sure it is KingFlorez Jan 2016 #3

Very nice. Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #4

"I'm a wimp; vote for me" isn't a winning campaign theme? closeupready Jan 2016 #6

I interpret her message of realism as a cover for her connections to Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #10

Right. She won't bite the hand that feeds her. closeupready Jan 2016 #13

The choice before voters is a candidate who hasn't gone down that road and Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #27

It's all very convenient, isn't it. The best candidate money could buy. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #18

I don't know if enough voters believe as we do..I have seen enough of the Jefferson23 Jan 2016 #29

So will this endorsement be enough to win SC for Bernie? book_worm Jan 2016 #5

Plus, Sandra Bland's family are Bernie supporters. senz Jan 2016 #7

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #12

Hardly is that fire wall cracking only in your minds FloridaBlues Jan 2016 #17

Didn't you already POST this earlier? And from the same ource, too: George II Jan 2016 #19

NO. Segami Jan 2016 #20

All you did was change the subject line, but the source is the same NYT article and the substance... George II Jan 2016 #22

This is NOT the same post Segami Jan 2016 #25

Some seem to have problems reading. Duval Jan 2016 #32

No, but some seem to have problems with accepting defeat graciously. George II Jan 2016 #84

Which defeat is that? bvar22 Jan 2016 #105

"big endorsements are switching to Bernie" George II Jan 2016 #108

Why don't you go alert on it? cui bono Jan 2016 #46

I live in Columbia, SC SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #23

sounds like you mean 98% of the 1% in SC. Lets see how that works out litlbilly Jan 2016 #48

Dear litibilly: SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #72

Not gonna happen. Hillary will not get that many of the AA vote when it's SC's turn. litlbilly Jan 2016 #74

As if now she has: SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #87

sc has a terrible voting system so no one will ever really know what the vote count is questionseverything Jan 2016 #98

Oh, I'm sure you are right SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #115

if alvin greene a homeless guy without a cell phone can beat questionseverything Jan 2016 #117

And so it goes madokie Jan 2016 #30

Hillary is crumbling! Helen Borg Jan 2016 #31

K&R _ Love this endorsement. Woot.! n/t 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #33

Maybe it's just me, but I don't care who endorses either Victor_c3 Jan 2016 #36

" ... a man talking to a man ... " let that resonate. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #42

The Endorsement Primary Gothmog Jan 2016 #44

Gothmog: SCantiGOP Jan 2016 #73

Thanks Gothmog Jan 2016 #75

It's sad that the woman with the best chance of becoming the first female POTUS jalan48 Jan 2016 #45

and of ethics and morality. cui bono Jan 2016 #47

Yes, because electing an elderly white guy screams "historical change". Beacool Jan 2016 #152

Yes-an elderly white woman will make all the difference. Not. jalan48 Jan 2016 #153

Well, if there's one area in which Camp Sanders has a proven track record... Tarc Jan 2016 #99

South Carolina is not the be all and end all, either of early states or of the primary. merrily Jan 2016 #102

Y'all have been saying that for months Empowerer Jan 2016 #126

Starts? Yupy Jan 2016 #151