Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie paid his family out of campaign funds, Hillary did not. [View all]NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)14. .
On Sat Mar 5, 2016, 08:27 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Bernie is paid his family out of campaign funds, Hillary did not.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511416753
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Linking to a right wing rag like Free Beacon is not okay no matter which side does it, using it to attack Sen Sanders' wife is completely over-the-top. This is Democratic Underground, we shouldn't be helping the opposition.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Mar 5, 2016, 08:38 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This author was only linking to a "right wing rag like the Free Beacon" to balance the argument of a Bernie supporter who committed the initial sin of linking an attack on Hillary from that very same "right wing rag" in an effort to illustrate that we should ALL stand against said "right wing rag like the Free Beacon".
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: derp.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Seriously, you didn't see the breathless thread that claimed Clinton used a campaign slush fund?
randome
Mar 2016
#3
Look....if the words "President Trump" don't motivate you to the polling booth, what
msanthrope
Mar 2016
#18
I was surprised to read that Jane Sanders did not support instituting tenure. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2016
#12
I would think the main point of the OP is to conclusively cancel out the original OP.
randome
Mar 2016
#24
What was the point of the original thread if not a poor attempt to trash Clinton?
randome
Mar 2016
#50
Seriously, math is hard. And there are other electoral concepts that are difficult...
wyldwolf
Mar 2016
#36
If one accepts the premise that payments through a campaign fund are unethical...
randome
Mar 2016
#40
Actually....it's a number of sources flowing from that one rag. And since you rec'd
msanthrope
Mar 2016
#62