Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Dawson Leery

(19,548 posts)

32. Berns pissed away millions in Ohio only to be trounced.

Reply to upaloopa (Original post)

Thu Mar 24, 2016, 01:33 PM

Mar 2016

She understands the value of money. Socialists do not.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary's campaign spends money efficiently. It raises less than Bernie but gets better results. [View all] upaloopa Mar 2016 OP

A small, elite team full of yes (wo)men astrophuss42 Mar 2016 #1

I don't think money spent has influenced this election (for her) as much as... TCJ70 Mar 2016 #2

Yup. You have to spend more against someone who has more name recognition. (n/t) thesquanderer Mar 2016 #3

So he will have a lot of name recognition when he goes back to the Senate CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #8

Did you forget about the super pacs fueled by David Brock & Wall Street? think Mar 2016 #4

Don't forget Sanders SuperPACS nor the foreign donations he can't explain... KittyWampus Mar 2016 #14

Are you including PACs? nt noamnety Mar 2016 #5

If she paid for the free media coverage that she has received.... peace13 Mar 2016 #6

LOL! "effective gatherings" you say? such as this one: amborin Mar 2016 #7

I guess that make Bernie a better candidate CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #9

Come on now NWCorona Mar 2016 #10

what a bizarre thing to say; and, separately, you uphold HRC as of and for the elites amborin Mar 2016 #16

That is an amazingly insensitive statement Armstead Mar 2016 #17

Is it stupid? Maybe not CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #28

That makes it more meaningful... Armstead Mar 2016 #29

I think that is a reasonable position CajunBlazer Mar 2016 #30

Super PACS HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #11

She has dropped 10% in the polls since last year, while Bernie has gained 45%. Dawgs Mar 2016 #12

Perhaps it's because rock Mar 2016 #13

That statement is revealing...So it's just a product? Armstead Mar 2016 #15

This isn't the 1896. And Sanders isn't William McKinley. baldguy Mar 2016 #25

I think Sanders and his supporters recognize that Armstead Mar 2016 #26

reckless regime change that strengthens ISIS? FTAs that harm the middle and working class? amborin Mar 2016 #18

Remember rock rock Mar 2016 #19

People prefer Brand A frylock Mar 2016 #23

Funny! rock Mar 2016 #24

And shares it with other Democrats running for election or re-election! Iliyah Mar 2016 #20

Money does buy access... Orsino Mar 2016 #21

You failed to mention Comcast and Time Warner UglyGreed Mar 2016 #22

You should probably look at all the races instead of just AZ. jeff47 Mar 2016 #27

Hillary has gobs and gobs of Super Pac money being spent in her favor. ThePhilosopher04 Mar 2016 #31

Berns pissed away millions in Ohio only to be trounced. Dawson Leery Mar 2016 #32