Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

northernsouthern

(1,511 posts)
29. Yeah I am not sure.
Mon Apr 11, 2016, 06:28 PM
Apr 2016

I have not heard of Super Delegates (or unpledged PLEOs as they call them) being used to swap a state's win or lose column (since they do not vote until the actual convention on the day the winner is decided and they just go popular. That being said I have heard many times of this. They say the state has flipped. So I think technically he may have won it by all the wording I have gotten from multiple state elections boards. One could say one candidate won it on election day or won the popular vote, but I do thing that it is still technically winning by EVERY official I have talked with in MULTIPLE states.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you have a link? Thanks. eom guillaumeb Apr 2016 #1
oops, here ya go Rebkeh Apr 2016 #14
Every bit helps! Good job Bernie delegates! Avalux Apr 2016 #2
No TMontoya Apr 2016 #3
Thanks for this mcar Apr 2016 #5
And yet in Wyoming, Bernie beat Hillary 56-44%, Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #43
Yeah link please. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #4
Sorry, Sanders doesn't get to steal Missouri. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #6
Have they stopped to think how this chicanery must be pissing off the Super Delegates? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #10
A clash of philosophies: Socialists steal from others, while Corporatists buy people off. Who wins? TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #22
link Ash_F Apr 2016 #7
Except no. As is explained in the comments... PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #8
Swing of 2 delegates...but not really. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #9
The OP is wrong-read the Missouri Delegate Selection Plan Gothmog Apr 2016 #11
I think many are new to the process RandySF Apr 2016 #13
The premise of the OP is simply false Gothmog Apr 2016 #31
Totally incorrect RandySF Apr 2016 #12
How do they get set? In Washington the State the process is similar to what the OP states. rhett o rick Apr 2016 #16
Washington is a caucus RandySF Apr 2016 #18
My mistake. It sounded like a caucus from the OP. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #19
Caucuses are different than primaries Gothmog Apr 2016 #32
Two things. DanTex Apr 2016 #15
This is what credentials committees are for Gothmog Apr 2016 #33
I know I shouldn't be laughing. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #17
Oh, I thought the "updated" edit was to point out that it's blatantly false. PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #20
the question is why aren't some of the Clinton delegates showing up dana_b Apr 2016 #21
Got the Facts!!! northernsouthern Apr 2016 #23
Read the Missouri Delegate Selection plan Gothmog Apr 2016 #34
Sanders is the only person that can win "retroactively" KingFlorez Apr 2016 #24
Yes, very brilliant! northernsouthern Apr 2016 #25
He probably forced Hillary's delegates not to show up. smiley Apr 2016 #26
Clinton won the state KingFlorez Apr 2016 #27
Delegate counts are what decides the winner correct? smiley Apr 2016 #28
Yeah I am not sure. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #29
Two questions about you earlier post. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #30
primary results are 100% binding and can't be overruled by the delegate appointment process. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #35
Just wondering where you got your facts because they are incorrect. northernsouthern Apr 2016 #37
MO is a primary state not a caucus one. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #38
It is so a caucus northernsouthern Apr 2016 #39
No. You're just wrong on this. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #40
Sooo... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #41
The plain text of the document speaks for itself. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #44
In your own words... northernsouthern Apr 2016 #45
I'll choose to believe my own lying eyes, kthxbai nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #47
You bolded the relevant section on page 11 Godhumor Apr 2016 #46
Honestly, I don't understand this at all. sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #36
Is this lie still being perpetuated? Tarc Apr 2016 #42
kicking to offer OP the chance to delete - since it's blatantly false. PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #48
Clinton won SCantiGOP Apr 2016 #49
It isn't false... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #50
Yes, it's 100% inaccurate. False. Untrue. Just like your post earlier about people here PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #51
Did you see the final CD delegate allocation Bernie got 51% in that. GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #52
Which has ZERO bearing on the national delegate count. PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #53
Well thanks for answering... no need to be rude next time when someone is unfamiliar with the rules. GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #54
That's freaking adorable that you think *I* am rude. PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #55
I don't believe I have ever said anything rude to you GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #56
You've taken plenty of broad sweeping nasty jabs far more personal PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #59
As if Citizen's United wasn't bad enough, 2banon Apr 2016 #58
I will not be removing the OP Rebkeh Apr 2016 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #57
NYT: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Win in Missouri, Officially brooklynite Apr 2016 #60
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders Wins Misso...»Reply #29