Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
15. It is very good and a quick read. I am about 85 pages in.
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

His thesis is that the Democratic Party really stopped being the party of the poor and the working and middle class a long time ago. He says if the Republican Party can be described as the party of the upper 1%, the Democrat are the party of the upper 10%, what Frank calls the professional class: doctors, lawyers, clergy, engineers, architects, economists, managers, financial planners, computer programmers, etc., a social order defined by test scores and advanced degrees. He says:

<Teachers know what we must learn; architects know what our buildings must look like; economists know what the Federal Reserve's discount rate should be; art critics know what is in good taste and what is in bad. Although we are the subjects of all these diagnoses and prescriptions, the group to which professionals ultimately answer is not the public, but their peers (and of course, their clients). They listen mainly to one another. The professions are autonomous; they are not required to heed voices from below their circle of expertise.>

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

THANK YOU, Tom! elleng Apr 2016 #1
Excellent and thank you!!! nt slipslidingaway Apr 2016 #2
Great post. nm rhett o rick Apr 2016 #3
Thanks for your post...K & R TheProgressive Apr 2016 #4
Same here. Wellstone ruled Apr 2016 #6
She keeps touting Dodd-Frank as some big, great piece of legislation dana_b Apr 2016 #5
Thomas Frank on Obama in his book "Listen, Liberal" BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #7
I hadn't seen those passages Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #11
It is very good and a quick read. I am about 85 pages in. BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #15
The steroid analogy is near perfect. Hillary supporters have no defense. reformist2 Apr 2016 #8
How sanctimonious of Tom to mention this. Can't he learn to look forward? Scuba Apr 2016 #9
Great OP Tom! KPN Apr 2016 #10
this analysis somehow ignores the fact that banks have influence over members of Congress as well. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #12
Very true. I consciously left it out Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #16
the provision you're referencing was put in there by Republicans in the House. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #17
Yes. And it does underscore why controlling Congress too is so important n/t Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #18
ironic thing is that the part of Dodd-Frank being repealed there was authored geek tragedy Apr 2016 #19
Wall Street money bought freedom for Wall Street criminals. Plain and simple. Dems to Win Apr 2016 #13
GASP!! *stutter* *stutter* *FAINTS* stillwaiting Apr 2016 #14
Taking The Baseball Analogy A Little Further.... global1 Apr 2016 #20
I can't imagine a situation in which Hortensis Apr 2016 #21
Let's take the milidest possible form for starters Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #23
Access? Yes. I've said so here on DU myself, Hortensis Apr 2016 #24
To be clear, I am not agreeing with your premise Tom Rinaldo Apr 2016 #25
Well, it is important not to elect Hortensis Apr 2016 #28
Agreed. It halt's progress. Corporations care about profits, not America. NT Joob Apr 2016 #22
Reality compromised him. CrowCityDem Apr 2016 #26
Still looking for the evidence Obama compromised in return for money. upaloopa Apr 2016 #27
Eric Holder, Wall Street Double Agent, Comes in From the Cold (RollingStone - July 8 2015) think Apr 2016 #30
kick nt slipslidingaway Apr 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»OK, I'll Say It. Yes, Big...»Reply #15