Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Snarkoleptic

(6,003 posts)
79. kick for visibility
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 09:41 PM
Apr 2016

One would think that, out of an abundance of caution, those in the political sphere would go to great lengths to avoid the appearance of impropriety.

The appearance of impropriety is a phrase referring to a situation which to a layperson without knowledge of the specific circumstances might seem to raise ethics questions. For instance, although a person might regularly and reliably collect money for her employer in her personal wallet and later give it to her employer, her putting it in her personal wallet may appear improper and give rise to suspicion, etc. It is common business practice to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appearance_of_impropriety
Why do the Clintons need a few shell companies? Segami Apr 2016 #1
THAT is a great Question. Octafish Apr 2016 #57
But That IN FACT Did Not Happen-See Her Consolidated Income Tax Returns Stallion Apr 2016 #59
Thanks. What else is out there that we don't know about? Octafish Apr 2016 #60
It Appears Those LLCs are Simply Common Pass Through Entities Since Revenue is Recognized .... Stallion Apr 2016 #61
Thank you. Appreciate the details. Octafish Apr 2016 #68
Funny... I JUst Put Up The Very Same Post/Story/Link... And It Was HIDDEN! HOW DOES THAT WORK? CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #2
why was it hidden? I don't understand nt TheDormouse Apr 2016 #3
EXACT SAME THING AND MINE WAS HIDDEN... I FIND THIS UNFAIR... DARE I SAY... UNDEMOCRATIC? CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #5
Don't sweat it. TM99 Apr 2016 #30
A Concise description My Friend! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #63
Luck of the draw.....I have NO intentions of hiding this post. Segami Apr 2016 #6
I Am Not Asking For Your Post To Be Hidden... I Am Asking WHY MY Exact Same Post Was Hidden? CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #9
My Post Had 5 recs Right Off The Bat Too! Trollers for Hillary? CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #10
You definitely got a biased jury CN. MO is classic bury/hide these facts asap. nc4bo Apr 2016 #18
If it was hidden you should have received jury results. Agschmid Apr 2016 #20
Skinner has promised to remove posters from jury duty who vote in a nakedly partisan manner to hide JimDandy Apr 2016 #23
My Post Was Exactly The Same As THIS One! Here is The Alert W/ Link... CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #64
The source - that is a source that generally is not trusted for anything dbackjon Apr 2016 #71
THEY Must Be Embarrassed... Now The Entire Post Is Hidden, No Comments Seen... 18 Recs! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #77
Your post now has 9 rec's. edgineered Apr 2016 #31
Has 17 Recs Last Count! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #65
Here Is The Original Post... What Was Wrong With This? CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #78
I can't tell you why or who voted to hide your post... Segami Apr 2016 #11
The link. RiverLover Apr 2016 #13
Clinton's With FIVE Shell companies In Delaware To "Save" On Their Taxes! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #15
As You Know Segami, I Support Most All Of Your Posts! Have Seen Reciprocal Support From You As Well CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #17
Did you put it in the primaries forum? I put something in the general and it was shut Maraya1969 Apr 2016 #12
It Was In The Primaries Because HillBill Is In The Primary! Appropriate I Would Think! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #16
Does anyone who voted to keep xloadiex Apr 2016 #21
The person with the post hidden has a copy of them. Agschmid Apr 2016 #26
post #19 n/t dana_b Apr 2016 #45
I was on that jury (juror #1) dana_b Apr 2016 #19
Double srtandard, I served on a Breitbart sourced post and the opposite ocured Dragonfli Apr 2016 #43
The demographics change continually edgineered Apr 2016 #22
man, they are DESPERATE to make sure that this is hidden dana_b Apr 2016 #24
They know this will hurt! Segami Apr 2016 #28
I have a feeling that "hide" becomes strategy CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #33
yeah, that makes sense dana_b Apr 2016 #34
Expect to see Brian 'Bot-Boy' Fallon bright n' early chirping up a defense making the media rounds Segami Apr 2016 #41
Thanks... Segami Apr 2016 #25
I had a post hidden too that was just a news post Zira Apr 2016 #27
Glad to see this posted, another post was hidden. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #4
When posts like that one get hidden, you KNOW somethin's up. nt cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #8
What gets me is that those who hide it must suspect it's true senz Apr 2016 #40
The "bottom of this" is many think it's "Her turn". cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #42
Then why did you say senz Apr 2016 #44
^^^ Follow the link, give the hidden post a REC. nt edgineered Apr 2016 #29
I did rec 12 840high Apr 2016 #36
Gotta keep that money from filtering down to the Proles through taxes... YUP. cherokeeprogressive Apr 2016 #7
Kick azmom Apr 2016 #14
Kickin' & a Recken' 2banon Apr 2016 #32
Now we post from the Free Beacon Gomez163 Apr 2016 #35
Care to disprove it? 840high Apr 2016 #37
People have been incorporating in Delaware since Christ was a kid. Gomez163 Apr 2016 #38
READ THIS-From a Corporate Attorney and Bernie Sanders Supporter Stallion Apr 2016 #39
READ THIS-From The New York Times and not a random person on reddit chascarrillo Apr 2016 #47
That Was Written in 2012 and Has Nothing to Do with the Clinton Corps Stallion Apr 2016 #48
I'll trust the NYT over some anonymous guy on reddit, or here. Thanks. -nt- chascarrillo Apr 2016 #49
OK But I Just Started a Thread with Link to Clinton's Tax Returns Which Shows Revenue Received ... Stallion Apr 2016 #51
Even though HRC's name has been revealed, I doubt we'll hear the whole story until after election. snowy owl Apr 2016 #46
Actually the real story is available in her tax returns right now. Agschmid Apr 2016 #53
I Just Started a Thread to Make it Easier-They Show Revenues Received from Those LLCs Stallion Apr 2016 #54
I worked for a .com "headquartered" there Recursion Apr 2016 #50
My Fortune 500 company is based there. Agschmid Apr 2016 #52
Right-Since a Corp MAY Be Subject to Tax in Other States Its Authorized to Transact Business In Stallion Apr 2016 #55
Is this new information? I never knew this before. Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #56
No The Corporations are Listed in Her Consolidated Income Tax Returns Stallion Apr 2016 #58
So she and bill don't have shell companies "headquartered" in Delaware? Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #69
What are you trying to evade and/or avoid? Arizona Roadrunner Apr 2016 #62
And you would be wrong. dbackjon Apr 2016 #72
if the mods don't bring this up thurs restorefreedom Apr 2016 #66
Of course they won't. Unfortunately, neither will Bernie himself. TheDormouse Apr 2016 #80
Time for a little KICK nt edgineered Apr 2016 #67
kick amborin Apr 2016 #70
This is why public trust is vital felix_numinous Apr 2016 #73
K & R ALittleBirdie Apr 2016 #74
ironic how someone is asking if Bernie ever paid NY state income taxes lol TheDormouse Apr 2016 #75
K&R TheDormouse Apr 2016 #76
kick for visibility Snarkoleptic Apr 2016 #79
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This Delaware Address Is ...»Reply #79