Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Clock is ticking Hillary supporters [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)146. The comparison is between how it was great and transparent when Snowden
revealed it. The demands then were for total transparency. There were to be no state secrets, according to some posters. It was authoritarian to argue there should be any.
Now suddenly there is an acknowledgment that there is such a thing as national security and some things ought not to be revealed and it was too dangerous for Hillary to have that information on another server. From basically the same posters.
They should not care, because it makes it all transparent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
157 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't ask it everyday. I just can't wait to hear the spin on this one. It should be a doozy!
Skwmom
Apr 2016
#6
ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch
Buzz Clik
Apr 2016
#14
The so-called "classified" info was taken from MEDIA REPORTS about drone strikes
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#128
Actually, it is utterly believable to me that someone of HRC's age still speaks to a Dictaphone
WheelWalker
Apr 2016
#104
Not true. The Federal law changed after Hillary left office and she doesn't support changing the law
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#130
And the fact that we're resorting to Right Wing punditry to make our point doesn't bother you?
nolawarlock
Apr 2016
#46
I don't know who he is but I have seen him on some shows and he gives very clear
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#135
It only hurts people who don't want to deal with the truth . . they have to do more mental
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#134
Spreading State secrets was oh, so grand and heroic and statue worthy when Snowden did it.
Scurrilous
Apr 2016
#122
The hilarity and utter scurrilousness of your comparison of Snowden (all things public, common good)
BirdieSanders
Apr 2016
#132
I'm pretty sure they can start posting stuff about Vince Foster and it would be allowed to stay
nolawarlock
Apr 2016
#31
A Bernie supporter already posted a site where Vince Foster was among the conspiracy theories ...
nolawarlock
Apr 2016
#139
Disgusting! Does anyone have the Enemies Within piece on Sander's? Repost on this thread!
Firebrand Gary
Apr 2016
#12
So you probably think that a friend who won't let you driver yourself home when you are drunk
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#141
OMG, I've read about this logical fallacy! I didn't know people still tried this one.
Dem2
Apr 2016
#47
Now truthfully, do you think for a moment Hillary would release her delegates to Sanders?
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#33
We shouldn't stand for Right Wing hate from Fox News pundits, that's for sure. nt
nolawarlock
Apr 2016
#64
I'm against War, the Death penalty, torture, the TPP, The Keystone XL, The corporatocry
Unicorn
Apr 2016
#84
He does explain the laws very clearly. I've seen him on a number of videos. He's good.
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#142
Why, given the man's track record (facepalm), would anyone believe a word he said is credible?
procon
Apr 2016
#147
That's not the only clock ticking, either. Just wait. just as I predicted, she will take the
silvershadow
Apr 2016
#53
Someone is quoting Napolitano here with a straight face? He's a whackjob. Why not just find a
kerry-is-my-prez
Apr 2016
#88
Yes, you are. That's where they love to post 3 month old, long discredited stories.nt
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#124