Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: "Jill Stein: The Democratic Party 'fakes left,' marches right" [View all]bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)79. But but, enabling Republicans ,Enabling Republicans! They should just get a room.
You may be good with that shit, but don't come out and say "vast right wing conspiracy" then get in bed with them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
178 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Defending FDR's values against a domestic neoliberal/foreign neocon collapse in values isn't bashing
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#3
So since then they manage to amass about $10 million per year. For some pretty damn
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#50
a well deserved bashing and why would you assume Jill Stein is pro Tad Devine?
m-lekktor
Apr 2016
#57
Tad Devine was around just after the 1968 convention when they were created? nt
silvershadow
Apr 2016
#144
How is it bashing to address that policies have drifted towards a philosophy that is neo-liberal?
Fantastic Anarchist
Apr 2016
#163
Where their registrations will most likely be switched to Republican before the election,
Baitball Blogger
Apr 2016
#16
Blaming the victim is typical of the Clinton/Conservative Wing. Those that get disenfranchised
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#25
Yea , they not Real American either! Let them go back to where they came from.
bahrbearian
Apr 2016
#29
Once Hillary realizes that bernie's supporters know her claiming to move even a millimeter to the
djean111
Apr 2016
#6
Commonly known as "limousine liberals", more recently "latte liberals" nt
BernieforPres2016
Apr 2016
#23
I have understood this a long time, most are comfortable financially (not necessarily rich) but
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#98
True what you say, there were "Rockefeller Republicans" who were were the left of what is now the
Blue Meany
Apr 2016
#101
Yep. And she's going to try to win this on identity politics (read: I'm a woman!) alone.
reformist2
Apr 2016
#13
People will choose half a loaf instead of none. Then one-quarter, then one-eighth... crumbs, anyone?
reformist2
Apr 2016
#12
The Democratic Party: Can't nominate a progressive candidate. Capitulates right
Attorney in Texas
Apr 2016
#30
People new to politics may not have been around for the election of Barack Obama
Renew Deal
Apr 2016
#32
Yes, we get it. Political opponents should be treated like battlefield enemies.
Renew Deal
Apr 2016
#67
But but, enabling Republicans ,Enabling Republicans! They should just get a room.
bahrbearian
Apr 2016
#79
Wait for it. She's a Commie, Hippie, troublemaking, treehugger. Not to mention sexist and racist.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2016
#28
Damn I didnt know. I thought she was a simply a rabid, corporate socialist willing to sell the
Katashi_itto
Apr 2016
#89
You mean she just gets appointed the Green Party candiate? In some kind of back-room deal?
IamMab
Apr 2016
#43
I'm inclined to think a center-right/center-left coalition is far more likely
brooklynite
Apr 2016
#145
Aside from her perennial presidential campaign, what are Jill Stein's accomplishments again? Any?
IamMab
Apr 2016
#40
Aside from destabilizing countries, Pro TPP, endless war mongering what has Clinton done?
Katashi_itto
Apr 2016
#42
Just pointing out what exactly does Clinton actually offer? Not deflection It's Comparison shopping.
Katashi_itto
Apr 2016
#54
LOL!!!! Project much? So Clinton has nothing to offer eh! Thanks And I welcome your Ignore.
Katashi_itto
Apr 2016
#61
Not much, but a few things, let's compare accomplishments of Sanders v Clinton
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#107
This isn't a discussion of Stein. It's a discussion of the Democratic Party. I'm voting Sanders, not
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#53
If the status quo establishment will nominate the least trusted and most disliked candidate since
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#95
See post #98 as it is directly related to points you are making plus what it means re the parties
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#110
If she'd like to influence the Democratic choice, I'd suggest she join the Party
brooklynite
Apr 2016
#63
lol! "Fuck you and your progressive values; now get on board with the candidate I chose for you!"
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#72
If you all ship over to The Green Party, you might DOUBLE her vote...to 1.3%
brooklynite
Apr 2016
#109
How is being the nominee of a third party desperate? I don't think that the nominees of the Green or
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#83
Each individual vote is meaningless unless the difference between candidates' vote totals is "1"
JonLeibowitz
Apr 2016
#155
I don't think the Democratic Party will split, but this election will redefine both parties so that
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#92
Yeah, may be. It wouldn't be the first time there were tectonic ideological shifts
Broward
Apr 2016
#106
Jill Stein and the Green Party: Their left wing talk is nothing but a veneer for supporting Trump
tritsofme
Apr 2016
#108
Your post was nonsense. People can write in a candidate, vote Libertarian, vote Green, or stay home
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#118
If enough people take that mentality, then Trump could carry "blue" states with margins like 47-46-7
tritsofme
Apr 2016
#153
If she's that vulnerable, we should nominate someone who isn't the least liked/most distrusted
Vote2016
Apr 2016
#158
I don't think she is. I just reject the argument that voting third party can always be consequence
tritsofme
Apr 2016
#159
How many times has Jill Stein ever voted with Republicans in congress?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2016
#147
More appreciation for the party who allowed Sanders to run in our primaries, we are the
Thinkingabout
Apr 2016
#130