Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Message auto-removed [View all]sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)40. If they are candidates for their districts
or state, then the citizen has a right to vote
as they feel is appropriate.
I won't vote in Ohio or in Florida, but in
my state I can and will vote as I see fit.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So they should select someone who's losing both pledged delegates and the popular vote
Cali_Democrat
May 2016
#23
Yes. Tell the super-duper-delegates that they don't have to take the dirty money
rhett o rick
May 2016
#22
with no tax deductions. And to legitimate charities not money laundrys like
rhett o rick
May 2016
#28
Better than calling the women the b word and threatening to cut out men's tongues.
seabeyond
May 2016
#3
They just know that to get it, they need to vote for Hillary, who shares those views
synergie
May 2016
#12
Clinton can not be trusted. She lied about WMD in Iraq. How much more serious can you get?
rhett o rick
May 2016
#25
You seem to be getting her confused with Bush, so I'd suggest that wherever you get
synergie
May 2016
#53
Oh that pesky math again, CONS and BSer do not like math and science, it tells them
synergie
May 2016
#27