2016 Postmortem

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)

60. You do know that you can skip over any post you don't want to read?

Reply to politicaljunkie41910 (Reply #25)

Wed May 4, 2016, 04:30 PM

May 2016

It is not a requirement to read everything posted. Here, we get to pick and choose. If you don't like it- move on. You have both an ignore and trash button.

So please, spare the rest of us your whining about it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Judge: Clinton may be ordered to testify in records case [View all] NWCorona May 2016 OP

GOP wont give up till she is destroyed. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #1

Very true but this is a Clinton appointed judge. nt NWCorona May 2016 #2

whooops, the truth hurts tomm2thumbs May 2016 #14

Yup! NWCorona May 2016 #19

self-inflicted wounds tomm2thumbs May 2016 #21

I have heard that elsewhere...almost verbatim - weird Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #47

It's the truth NWCorona May 2016 #48

That is what they say Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #49

It's not an issue of being fooled NWCorona May 2016 #51

Nope, it is a right wing conspiracy to destroy Hillary and that conspiracy is alive and well here Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #53

And that's your opinion but the FBI wouldn't be waiting this much time on nonsense. nt NWCorona May 2016 #56

The non stop promotion of this on DU is noted. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #59

Note away but I think it's silly not to expect this not to be covered here. NWCorona May 2016 #62

As you and a few others have said a few thousand times. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #63

The GOP conspiracy to destroy the Clinton's is alive and well. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #46

uh huh tomm2thumbs May 2016 #50

Incubated by Hillary's ineptitude and Poor Choices. frylock May 2016 #52

Whatever. That conservative political action group has Hortensis May 2016 #36

The FOIA lawsuits are entirely separate from... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #38

No, this is "Judicial Watch" mischief. Don't you love the name? Hortensis May 2016 #41

I think one of the first FOIA lawsuits was from Vce News Ash_F May 2016 #54

Yes, I know it's a conservative group, and... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #67

No. Appointed first by Ronnie Raygun and promoted by Poppy Bush. COLGATE4 May 2016 #37

Emmet G. Sullivan was appointed by Bill Clinton Ash_F May 2016 #3

facts are so inconvenient to the rw meme industry people roguevalley May 2016 #8

...and Obama's agencies/depts are continuing to investigate her, and a referral (case sent to DOJ) JudyM May 2016 #11

Also it was Obama's state department that referred the case to the FBI Ash_F May 2016 #13

This is a Federal judge, not the GOP. morningfog May 2016 #26

The FBI's investigation into Clinton's email server and whether or not she CoffeeCat May 2016 #65

Clinton ran the business of this country on personally owned equipment in the basement of her home. CentralCoaster May 2016 #4

What a shame RobertEarl May 2016 #7

"Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall." (Proverbs 16:18) CentralCoaster May 2016 #18

You know what they say about opinions and assholes; everybody's got one. politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #25

If you don't like the "speculation", then don't read it eom tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #39

You do know that you can skip over any post you don't want to read? notadmblnd May 2016 #60

well, now we know something new grasswire May 2016 #5

Yup! This is just one of the many cases under Clinton's use of a server NWCorona May 2016 #6

and this is not related to the "interviews" by the FBI. grasswire May 2016 #9

Yup poor Martha, she should have listened to her lawyers NWCorona May 2016 #10

I think FBI may block her testimony... HooptieWagon May 2016 #12

I don't think so. grasswire May 2016 #15

If she tells the truth or lies she's toast. HooptieWagon May 2016 #17

... And since the FBI is moving slower, it will be helpful to have this testimony happen before the JudyM May 2016 #16

She won't testify...more crap Demsrule86 May 2016 #44

Apparently the judge, who was appointed by Bill, is the one with the intent to help tRump, eh? JudyM May 2016 #45

Good dana_b May 2016 #20

The answer seems obvious and not to sexy BootinUp May 2016 #22

Nope! No interest at all that Clinton might be compelled to testify under oath. nt NWCorona May 2016 #23

Not after what transpired last September, correct. BootinUp May 2016 #27

That had nothing to do with this NWCorona May 2016 #28

The public is tired of hearing about it and this story will do nothing BootinUp May 2016 #29

AFAIK public opinion has absolutely no bearing farleftlib May 2016 #66

K & R AzDar May 2016 #24

Of course she was trying "to evade public records disclosures". That was the entire point. arcane1 May 2016 #30

Yup. It will be interesting to find out what she deleted. IdaBriggs May 2016 #33

She'll privatize the entire executive branch if given the opportunity. arcane1 May 2016 #34

This is great news... Mike Nelson May 2016 #31

So it continues... bvf May 2016 #32

"from the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch" VOX May 2016 #35

Conservative group or not, the fact... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #43

K&R! KoKo May 2016 #40

Which probably means they have the evidence she did just that Matariki May 2016 #42

Why Bother? MattP May 2016 #55

The same reason they file birther lawsuits MattP May 2016 #57

You'll find out soon enough NWCorona May 2016 #58

Heads Up: This story is also available at Breitbart. nt BootinUp May 2016 #61

And the sky is blue NWCorona May 2016 #64

What a farce. Sparkly May 2016 #68

Well, this should be interesting. Peace Patriot May 2016 #69