Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

idiots kevink077 Oct 2012 #1
Of course it is possible Demsrule86 Oct 2012 #28
Nate will need to go into hiding after Obama wins at this rate flamingdem Oct 2012 #2
Mentally send Nate good vibes.. He knows it come with the territory Thekaspervote Oct 2012 #3
Nates latest tweet.. BraKez2 Oct 2012 #4
that is awesome! Joe and the rest must've had to drop out of statistics Coexist Oct 2012 #6
What's so hard about a multiple regression? Marmitist Oct 2012 #22
You forgot Welsh! Try doing calculus in Welsh sign language. blue-kite Oct 2012 #27
Rassmussen and Gallup show Sandy landfall in Boston!!!!! blazeKing Oct 2012 #10
Haa ha ha Glamrock Oct 2012 #14
Or Glamrock Oct 2012 #15
Romney has no momentum and is behind Demsrule86 Oct 2012 #29
If they think it's 50.1 abumbyanyothername Oct 2012 #5
Right wing pundits have been beating up octoberlib Oct 2012 #7
Nothing Would Make Me More Proud.... SingleSeatBiggerMeat Oct 2012 #8
All I Know Is... BlueDemKev Oct 2012 #9
It's not just Nate Silver. Jim Lane Oct 2012 #26
Nothing captures the Republican disdain for science more than the excoriation of Nate Silver RomneyLies Oct 2012 #11
LOL jonpaulprime Oct 2012 #31
Poor Nate meadowlark5 Oct 2012 #12
But Silver is in an excellent position . . . MrModerate Oct 2012 #20
Must be marching orders from on high! ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #13
They're trying to rough up the ref RomneyLies Oct 2012 #17
effing idiots texasleo Oct 2012 #16
Both simple math (like subtracting one number from 5 trillion) . . . MrModerate Oct 2012 #18
I don't know if it's been posted here yet, but TroyD Oct 2012 #19
Wasn't that written by some fat slob? Alekei_Firebird Oct 2012 #21
Nate's numbers are the product of statistical, scientific analysis, and Repugs can't stand it. reformist2 Oct 2012 #23
This election will validate Nate in ways never seen before from a person in his position DHelix Oct 2012 #24
My advice to Nate: avoid small planes n/t ailsagirl Oct 2012 #25
I needed to see this. jonpaulprime Oct 2012 #30
"We hate arithmetic, and I hate people who can do arithmetic!" struggle4progress Oct 2012 #32
I know he was relatively unknown in 2008 (in political forecasting, not as a statistician in other FVZA_Colonel Oct 2012 #33
Its all bluster. apnu Oct 2012 #34
I LOVE this Stuckinthebush Oct 2012 #35
Poor guy gets it from both sides Egnever Oct 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»538's Nate Silver startin...»Reply #36