2016 Postmortem

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)

68. Of course not.... they will claim she was protected by her fellow oligarchs.

Thu May 5, 2016, 06:53 PM

May 2016

Make no mistake, they've decided already. Now it's just about shaping the narrative to fit their predetermined conclusions. Expect no apologies.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Government Officials tell CNN: NO evidence against HRC so far as top aides interviewed. [View all] NewsCenter28 May 2016 OP

Hopefully this will be wrapped up soon so she can just concentrate on the election. MoonRiver May 2016 #1

The FBI already confirmed they were delaying... scscholar May 2016 #35

UGH! MoonRiver May 2016 #65

Link? Thanks! nt IdaBriggs May 2016 #2

Sorry! http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/fbi-interviews-huma-abedin-clinton-aide/index.html NewsCenter28 May 2016 #3

Found it, but it's not all roses... IdaBriggs May 2016 #12

Why? You seem to be trying very hard to make something out of a whole bunch of nothing. synergie May 2016 #18

Actually it was a good post. NWCorona May 2016 #20

Beg pardon? OilemFirchen May 2016 #58

Yes because holes or other issues come up through other NWCorona May 2016 #63

C'mon. You made a ridiculous assertion. Own up to it. OilemFirchen May 2016 #64

Yes it's common but you are making it seem that NWCorona May 2016 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author nolawarlock May 2016 #59

Doesn't Sound Good pmorlan1 May 2016 #50

"Willfully" is irrelevant. [n/t] Maedhros May 2016 #4

It would be most relevant if it were you or I. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for us. arcane1 May 2016 #11

If laws were passed yesteday about something that you did 4 years ago, you'd be synergie May 2016 #19

The framers of the Constitution in their infinite wisdom prohibited ex post facto laws. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #22

That's my point: whether Hillary 'willfully' put the data at risk, or did so inadvertently, Maedhros May 2016 #30

Just like it's not a war crime to bomb a hospital if it's a "mistake" arcane1 May 2016 #32

Well, yeah. Duh. Maedhros May 2016 #38

"willfully" is the key to determining whether a criminal act took place DrDan May 2016 #13

No soup for you. Read the statute DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #14

Negligence is relevant. (n/t) Petrushka May 2016 #45

No, it is of supreme importance in interpreting the law The Second Stone May 2016 #62

What a load of bunk. The FBI aren't commenting so who are these "officials"? snagglepuss May 2016 #5

Some of Hillary Clinton's closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin /nt Dragonfli May 2016 #24

Good! I believed it was a mistake but never criminal. hrmjustin May 2016 #6

"so far" jillan May 2016 #7

This will probably be the end result, though disappointing to those who wanted so badly to carry Thinkingabout May 2016 #8

Doesn't that suggest she did though? Just with Incompetence.... NT Joob May 2016 #9

this is gonna break the hearts of some here DrDan May 2016 #10

Sadly, that is true Stuckinthebush May 2016 #16

No evidence yet? ContinentalOp May 2016 #15

There's one problem NWCorona May 2016 #17

More and more proof it's a nothingburger mcar May 2016 #21

it would probably be better for all concerned mooseprime May 2016 #23

14 recs with no link? What's up? Link please.. nt silvershadow May 2016 #25

There's a link it's just a little down thread. nt NWCorona May 2016 #29

You mean that copy and paste? nt silvershadow May 2016 #31

I didn't look to see if they are the same actually. nt NWCorona May 2016 #36

yeah, there is no link. The copy/paste takes me to an unrelated Google page. nt silvershadow May 2016 #37

I am so sorry-here is the link. NewsCenter28 May 2016 #40

Oh *that? That just says status quo, she still hasn't been cleared. ok. nt silvershadow May 2016 #43

I wonder which group this will anger more. Progressive dog May 2016 #26

One thing to say, let's wait + see, but some on this thread are upset that HRC may be in clear. Justice May 2016 #27

Pretty bad news for Clinton. basselope May 2016 #28

Not necessarily. Adrahil May 2016 #67

It still showcases the sloppiness. basselope May 2016 #69

Of the person who sent it? Sure. Adrahil May 2016 #70

Did Hillary lie when just this week she was asked if any of her aides have been NWCorona May 2016 #33

You're not going to give up on this are you? BootinUp May 2016 #41

Find one post by me where I advocate for Hillary to be locked up. I'll wait NWCorona May 2016 #44

I don't need to see you put it in exactly those words when BootinUp May 2016 #46

So in other words.. You don't have shit to backup your shit talking. nt NWCorona May 2016 #51

Read it any way you desire. nt BootinUp May 2016 #53

WHen Hillary isnt indicted, I bet nary a single email story promoter around here will apologize Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #34

Oh no, they will keep on harping on her getting arrested and thrown in the hole, regardless. Nt seabeyond May 2016 #49

Why would they? Decline to Prosecute doesn't imply innocence. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #56

The GOP propaganda network is doing fine on DU. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #57

Of course not.... they will claim she was protected by her fellow oligarchs. Adrahil May 2016 #68

The headline is misleading. CanadaexPat May 2016 #39

Sorry you are right NewsCenter28 May 2016 #42

The way they do the attributions is confusing. CanadaexPat May 2016 #48

Who are they though? Ash_F May 2016 #52

Isn't that great news Sanders people? No evidence of wrong doing whatsoever. Aren't we all relieved. seabeyond May 2016 #47

:) Lucinda May 2016 #60

What an odd article. The same week the DOJ claims response to a FOIA request Press Virginia May 2016 #54

"US Government Officials" frylock May 2016 #55

Unless they are with the DOJ, they wouldn't know. But doesn't it sound impressive? FourScore May 2016 #72

I'm guessing State Department flunkies playing CYA. frylock May 2016 #73

And their wont be any. It was always just wishful thinking by some... Lucinda May 2016 #61

Trey Gowdy and a few folks here! ;) NT Adrahil May 2016 #71