Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bogus count. Doesn't include superdelegates. Gomez163 May 2016 #1
They haven't voted yet. nt silvershadow May 2016 #2
Nor have the pledged delegates. Not buying the Bernie spin. Gomez163 May 2016 #3
"If somebody has the majority of the delegates from the votes of the people.... virtualobserver May 2016 #5
She will get there June 7th. Zynx May 2016 #7
we will see virtualobserver May 2016 #10
Unless she gets wiped out in CA, it's a done deal. Zynx May 2016 #12
That is the point...there are so many delegates being chosen on June 7th. virtualobserver May 2016 #14
Not really, no. Zynx May 2016 #16
They aren't correctly polling the level of independents...and Hillary supporters are complacent. virtualobserver May 2016 #19
Bernie CANNOT get enough delegates to win. Hortensis May 2016 #32
he only has to win a majority of pledged delegates.. virtualobserver May 2016 #33
He CANNOT. Since Indiana he needs more delegates than Hortensis May 2016 #36
Sigh...debunking the lie one more time: lagomorph777 May 2016 #43
Believe what you want, but strap a pillow Hortensis May 2016 #44
It's not an opinion or a "belief"; it's an objective numerical fact. lagomorph777 May 2016 #45
I would settle for an accurate accounting first. Let's see where all the disenfranchisement scandal silvershadow May 2016 #15
The pledged are fixed, the supers not. morningfog May 2016 #24
What a ridiculous and specious claim. dchill May 2016 #27
Thanks! n/t KoKo May 2016 #4
yw! nt silvershadow May 2016 #21
Thanks for introducing me to him... I enjoy his posts. n/t JimDandy May 2016 #6
You are welcome. He does an an interesting take on things. nt silvershadow May 2016 #20
I do not think the author added in the 31 delegate net gain Sanders had today with WA fizzlerynx May 2016 #8
He added them even before today. onenote May 2016 #11
His Washington delegates have been baked in since the caucuses Zynx May 2016 #17
Narrow? She won Guam 60-40, four times the Indiana margin. CrowCityDem May 2016 #9
Delegate math Kittycat May 2016 #28
True, but she won 57% of the delegates. If that's 'narrow', Bernie's "big win" is basically a tie. CrowCityDem May 2016 #38
K & R AzDar May 2016 #13
A win is a win. Narrowly doesn't matter. Ask Bernie how many states or caucuses he's narrowly won. politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #18
She beat him by 20 points. Demsrule86 May 2016 #26
1 delegate. You know how we award points. Kittycat May 2016 #29
It was not a close primray Demsrule86 May 2016 #30
It was 1 delegate. Kittycat May 2016 #31
You are confusing the popular vote with the delegates required to win. Tiggeroshii May 2016 #34
For Bernie, a narrow loss, is as good as a huge loss. He has to win delegates by 70% or more to Fla Dem May 2016 #42
Ironically, Guam's superdelegates go with the popular vote. joshcryer May 2016 #22
As should the delegates from every state. It's just the right thing to do, and I am glad they are Tiggeroshii May 2016 #35
If supers had to vote with their states Bernie would still be behind. Buzz cook May 2016 #37
Not by 700 delegates Tiggeroshii May 2016 #39
Make up your mind Buzz cook May 2016 #40
Never said it would Tiggeroshii May 2016 #41
Congratulations to Hillary on winning Guam! Nye Bevan May 2016 #23
She won Guam by 20 points...according to Demsrule86 May 2016 #25
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Latest Delegate Count: (...»Reply #10