Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(12,865 posts)
64. Fear of "backlash" -- the perennial rationalizaion...
Sun May 8, 2016, 05:40 PM
May 2016

... for refusing to demonstrate the courage of their convictions.

Her objection to a necessary, and right, change in the rules is depressing, but it's par for the course for a candidate who's unofficial slogan is "No We Can't."

The Democratic "strategy" of pre-emptive surrender has done more to damage our party than anything the Republican noise machine could do to us. Their repeated demonstrations of weakness sows hopelessness and cynicism. It's the reason Democrats have been losing ground. The injuries are self-inflicted.

When will they realize that standing up for principle, win or lose, is the only way they can redeem themselves and inspire voters to come out and vote for them?

Even Bill Clinton "got it" once upon a time when he said: "When people feel uncertain, they'd rather have somebody who's strong and wrong than somebody, who's weak and right."

When will they realize that "strong and right" is the only way to win the day over "strong and wrong"?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not troubled. nolawarlock May 2016 #1
Of course you're not. You're not troubled by ANY of ... dchill May 2016 #3
You are SO right! If there was video of Hillary strangling a person Chasstev365 May 2016 #27
She could cut the throat of a cuddly kitten on live TV noiretextatique May 2016 #39
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #46
Also a disgusting post. Agschmid May 2016 #54
Sadder...it is true! Eom noiretextatique May 2016 #69
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #45
Somebody will be having a bad afternoon. cloudbase May 2016 #49
The alerter should be banned. Agschmid May 2016 #55
What a disgusting post. Agschmid May 2016 #53
actually, not true. i just find the crap people make up to be repulsive MariaThinks May 2016 #56
Wow you actually determine your vote for nomination off of TimPlo May 2016 #63
i'm the shallowist person on here. MariaThinks May 2016 #68
Well you may not be troubled... ljm2002 May 2016 #43
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #47
AANNNDDDDD... ljm2002 May 2016 #50
As the parent of a Trans Child, you're fucking RIGHT I'm troubled. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #60
Everything is viewed through the lens of "What's in it for Hillary". BillZBubb May 2016 #2
I'm a lesbian and I'm not troubled. OhZone May 2016 #4
I too am a lesbian and am not troubled justiceischeap May 2016 #66
Ohyeah! Exactly! OhZone May 2016 #67
Her fanclub isn't bothered by her being a neocon. HooptieWagon May 2016 #5
They really don't care what she has done or what she stands for. One day she is against same sex rhett o rick May 2016 #12
Wouldn't it be nice if she could take a principled, moral stand on anything? senz May 2016 #6
Right?! And she never has. She's no LEADER. AzDar May 2016 #8
In a way she is a leader... Fairgo May 2016 #16
True. AzDar May 2016 #22
Sanders never worried about being politically unpopular as long as Vermont kept mikehiggins May 2016 #10
Are you a Bernie supporter? senz May 2016 #13
Of course. Isn't everyone? nt mikehiggins May 2016 #17
Like his principled stand that we didn't need DOMA based on state's rights not equality? mythology May 2016 #18
From The Story: UGH- the cowardice... AzDar May 2016 #7
She didn't "evolve", she triangulated. According to her, she has "evolved" on a lot of issues rhett o rick May 2016 #14
Clinton is worse than Trump KingFlorez May 2016 #9
How can anyone dare to report what Hillary does? senz May 2016 #11
She isn't as bad as Trump or Cruz but she still will continue the distruction of the 99%. rhett o rick May 2016 #15
What is sad is that some love her because she supports social justice. She does not. rhett o rick May 2016 #19
Hillary Clinton is a Born Again Christian Silver_Witch May 2016 #20
nothin' says Christianity like Pol Pot! MisterP May 2016 #36
Hillary slander squad working overtime Dem2 May 2016 #21
Hilarious. Slander= Things she said/did... I guess that makes it easier to lie to yourself. AzDar May 2016 #24
Hey, if it makes u happy Dem2 May 2016 #25
Wouldn't it work ever-so-much better if Dems didn't support such a shifty candidate? AzDar May 2016 #28
Serious case of "Who you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?" libdem4life May 2016 #37
Since when are FACTS slander? senz May 2016 #29
Pivot, triangulate, evolve, rinse, repeat... XemaSab May 2016 #23
Cue the apologists with some lame excuse in 3...2...1... nt silvershadow May 2016 #26
Look No Further... Here they are- defending the indefensible. What's the going price on a 'soul'? AzDar May 2016 #31
Recycling this "controversy" from last fall? LuvLoogie May 2016 #30
Yes, this was debunked last fall but some people don't care SharonClark May 2016 #57
I really don't need anybody straight-'splaining to me what should be "troubling" n/t SFnomad May 2016 #32
None blinder than those who refuse to see... I've heard that somewhere. AzDar May 2016 #33
The BS cheerleaders here at DU are an example of it n/t SFnomad May 2016 #34
You do not speak for all LGBT people noiretextatique May 2016 #40
I never claimed to speak for all LGBT people or any other LGBT people for that matter SFnomad May 2016 #42
She's more afraid of what Palin might say than what actual Democrats who might vote for her would tularetom May 2016 #35
Palin? Yes, I'm sure they are best buds. SharonClark May 2016 #58
Kind of like when Bernie Sanders opposed same-sex marriage in Vermont in 2006. Nye Bevan May 2016 #38
Dishonest...he supported civil unions noiretextatique May 2016 #41
Right, because there was less political blowback from civil unions (nt) Nye Bevan May 2016 #44
Tell me again...how, precisely, is a fundamental right a matter of states rights? msanthrope May 2016 #48
She easily won the Village and Chelsea areas of NY in the primary. Nuff said. Metric System May 2016 #51
Nope not troubled. She's entitled to her beliefs and hasn't any plans puffy socks May 2016 #52
Doesn't bother me anigbrowl May 2016 #59
I don't know, a lot of them, like Ellen, seem to have ignored her whole record and jumped pdsimdars May 2016 #61
I'm more troubled about Bernie voting against to the Amber Alert system n/t Onlooker May 2016 #62
Fear of "backlash" -- the perennial rationalizaion... pat_k May 2016 #64
She's no LEADER... AzDar May 2016 #65
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Email Abo...»Reply #64