2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: "Hillary Doesn't Need Bernie Suppoters" [View all]SidDithers
(44,333 posts)On Sun May 8, 2016, 06:47 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
The Bernie or Bust crowd
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1924955
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Accuses Bernie supporters of easily supporting Trump, which is not true and a ToS violation.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 8, 2016, 07:25 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alerter's comments do not reflect what I am seeing the post.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is a thoughtful post and expresses the poster's opinion. If they don't vote for Hillary, they are in effect, supporting Trump, so I don't see anything offensive here.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: After initially voting the post was ok, I changed my mind after reading the reporters comments and re-reading the post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It said nothing of supporting Trump. It says, "be happier" with Trump. That could easily be read as the "I told you so" Nader crowd of 2000. I may be in the minority bc this is GD.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No, it's not a TOS violation. Supporting Trump is a TOS violation. Saying that some Bernie supporters will support Trump isn't.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Sid