Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Democrats see Hillary Clinton-Elizabeth Warren dream ticket [View all]tularetom
(23,664 posts)32. Clinton would never accept a VP that would outthink, outspeak, and generally outclass her
I also doubt that Warren wants to spend four years biting her tongue.
I get that the thought of a Clinton-Warren ticket makes some people all giddy, but these two have basically nothing in common, other than gender.
It doesn't matter who the nominal VP candidate is, the true running mate will be Bill Clinton. We've already seen some disturbing indications of that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not only does that neutralize Warren, it's going to give more gullible Sanders supporters
VulgarPoet
May 2016
#1
My prediction is that Hillary will find it hard finding a VP. Elizabeth Warren won't rescue Hillary.
Baobab
May 2016
#41
Hillary has not won, and for her to get the nomination is suicide for the Democratic Party.
Baobab
May 2016
#47
The Democratic Party has weighed the options and chosen the candidate they feel is better.
Renew Deal
May 2016
#54
He could easily accomplish his agenda if Progressives really voted for what they want instead of
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#66
must be why Republicans 'presidential' choice Trump mocked Senator Warren recently.
Sunlei
May 2016
#5
sorry, but there is too much fucking misogyny out there for such an idea. It's going
CTyankee
May 2016
#9
Um, nope. It would just be massively obvious pandering, with the bonus, for Third Way Hillary, of
djean111
May 2016
#10
Warren would be a massively good Vp, no pandering. Two women, you betcha. I would prefer Castro
seabeyond
May 2016
#19
You people are a hoot. Clinton so stupid she is gonna make sure she picks a lousy VP.
seabeyond
May 2016
#45
Nu uh. No way is Clinton going to pick a good VP, she is Clinton after all. Whatever.
seabeyond
May 2016
#68
Warren's honesty, her trustworthiness, her progressivism, her selflessness mitigate Hillary's flaws
Vote2016
May 2016
#12
Your perceived Clinton flaws that are not reality. I think Warren respects Clinton and they would
seabeyond
May 2016
#20
Warren's level of respect for Hillary shows. Castro is ideologically what you would expect from a
Vote2016
May 2016
#121
cali—Elizabeth Warren should be at the top of the ticket! Lead, not supporting, role.
CobaltBlue
May 2016
#13
Words can scarce express how disappointed I'd be in Warren if she accepted.
Lizzie Poppet
May 2016
#17
And look at the replies from Sanders supporters. Warren, under the bus you would go.
seabeyond
May 2016
#21
Of course, I'm anti-Warren. She is a woman. I am a Bernie supporter. I hate women.
ieoeja
May 2016
#23
Warren appears to respect Clinton, and Clinton respects Warren. That is a good thing our
seabeyond
May 2016
#70
I at least have evidence the two seems to be respectful of each other. You though, have nothing.
seabeyond
May 2016
#74
I know you think you are being sarcastic; but, some of you have show to be just that.
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#33
Yes, Bernie does have some bigoted supporters. So does Hillary. Remember 2008? Hillary actually ...
ieoeja
May 2016
#37
Actually if you looked at exit polls she is losing the white working class voters she won in 08
DemocratSinceBirth
May 2016
#48
True.As some undoubtedly support her now simply because she *tried* to stop the Black guy in 2008.nt
ieoeja
May 2016
#56
True. As some undoubtedly support her now simply because she is trying to stop the Jewish guy.
ieoeja
May 2016
#67
You just called me a liar. It would seem to be that you are the one who is projecting.
ieoeja
May 2016
#73
If that is the way you wish to interpret it; then, I can't help that ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#75
DU has its share of really stupid people. But you don't seem stupid enough to believe your posts. nt
ieoeja
May 2016
#77
The more you post the more unhinged you appear ... Let's call it a day. The drinks are on me.
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#92
You assume Warren would have to sell her soul to work with Clinton; all indications shows otherwise.
seabeyond
May 2016
#26
Clinton would never accept a VP that would outthink, outspeak, and generally outclass her
tularetom
May 2016
#32
Warren would not agree to such a matchup, this is just Hillary trying to woo
NorthCarolina
May 2016
#36
This would unite the party but Hillary is too selfish to nominate a running-mate who is better liked
Attorney in Texas
May 2016
#49