Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)

4. Well, in this country, guilt generally has to be proven.

Reply to monmouth4 (Original post)

Wed May 18, 2016, 06:55 PM

May 2016

So, the answer would more than likely be yes.

If you add in the context that the "investigation" is the latest in a two-decade-plus-long GOP witch hunt, then the answer would be "well, no shit".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If Bernard Sanders was under a possible indictment, do you think the DNC would allow him [View all] monmouth4 May 2016 OP

How about if Obama was under criminal investigation in 2008? Csainvestor May 2016 #1

yes MFM008 May 2016 #2

FBI have done this before? TimPlo May 2016 #3

Well, in this country, guilt generally has to be proven. TwilightZone May 2016 #4

the DNC cannot prevent a person running as a democrat so YES is the answer nt msongs May 2016 #5

They can't bar anyone from running for President KingFlorez May 2016 #6

The DNC doesn't give candidates permission to run. Skinner May 2016 #7

Yes... Mike Nelson May 2016 #8

Mind-numbing, isn't it? nt silvershadow May 2016 #9

Pray for Fitzmas!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gomez163 May 2016 #10

Well, at least I got my answer, thank you all... monmouth4 May 2016 #11

David Duke ran as a Democrat in 1988. You think the DNC would have allowed that? TwilightZone May 2016 #12

Someone needs their feelings validated. nt procon May 2016 #13

I don't need any validation hon, I just asked a question..n/t monmouth4 May 2016 #14

Hogwash. procon May 2016 #15

Probably not (nt) bigwillq May 2016 #16