Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PFunk1

(185 posts)
26. Well we can basicly say the democratic party is functionally dead now after november
Wed May 18, 2016, 11:26 PM
May 2016

As it's going to be split into two distinctive sides with no hope of unifying. With many thanks to being blamed for Clinton's loss joining the ever growing political group now know as "democratic independents".

But hey, this is what happens when you try to push a weak and unlikable DINO onto folks who no longer will accept one.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's already started. I was listening to that loudmouth Leslie Marshall on the radio. Unfortunately jillan May 2016 #1
And look what happened to him :-) Merryland May 2016 #3
Are they going to blame Bernie when the FBI recommends an indictment. Fawke Em May 2016 #22
Sure, attack our nominee endlessly, threaten her supporters and tell us you won't vote for her Trust Buster May 2016 #2
^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^ pkdu May 2016 #4
What you call an attack I call putting on your thinking cap Harmony Blue May 2016 #6
If death threats and spewing profanity at rally goers is your idea of "putting on your thinking cap" Trust Buster May 2016 #9
It's Clinton's job to connect to voters, convince them to vote for her Scootaloo May 2016 #10
Should she wait until the bros. stop calling her a bitch and other cute adjectives ? Trust Buster May 2016 #12
She should start ASAP. The more she dithers on it, the more it hurts her November performance Scootaloo May 2016 #14
Sorry, we're not interested. The vile attacks from Sanders supporters have left a bad taste in our Trust Buster May 2016 #16
Suit yourself. I'm hoping Clinton has a little more sense though. Scootaloo May 2016 #17
Those blinded by hatred for her would be an inefficient use of time and resources. Trust Buster May 2016 #18
And yet... Scootaloo May 2016 #19
To the victor go the spoils. She is not seeking your advice nor that of Sanders. Trust Buster May 2016 #20
But she'd do well to open an ear anyway. Could only help her November chances. Scootaloo May 2016 #23
To reasonable Sanders supporters, I would agree. The radicals ? Not worth the time and resources. Trust Buster May 2016 #24
Worth more than any Republican, at least. Scootaloo May 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author MFM008 May 2016 #5
Yeah, kind of how it wasn't Nader's fault that Gore lost in 2000. eastwestdem May 2016 #7
Nice logical fallacy Harmony Blue May 2016 #8
Election fraud had nothing to do with it! Scootaloo May 2016 #13
Yeap, it's not... I agree... Clinton will win and it wont be because of Sanders at this rate but I'm uponit7771 May 2016 #11
It's primarily a fundamental misunderstanding of Sanders supporters. jeff47 May 2016 #15
If Hillary loses the GE, its squarely on her shoulders. Arazi May 2016 #21
Well we can basicly say the democratic party is functionally dead now after november PFunk1 May 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It is not Bernies fault w...»Reply #26