2016 Postmortem

boston bean

(36,912 posts)

23. LOL. Sanders did not win the NV Caucuses. WTF?

Reply to bobbobbins01 (Reply #21)

Thu May 19, 2016, 04:58 AM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

All of these young men feeling the bern and feeling like something was taken from them in NV. [View all] boston bean May 2016 OP

Ever More Establishment FUD - Sad That The DNC Has Resorted To These Rovian Tactics cantbeserious May 2016 #1

Reading the Rolling Stone article, I think I've captured their reason for making threats. boston bean May 2016 #3

No Link Provided In The OP - Only Opinion cantbeserious May 2016 #4

Well, there is a rolling stone article posted here right on the front page of this forum. boston bean May 2016 #6

Thank You For Validating The Point cantbeserious May 2016 #10

and you as well. boston bean May 2016 #15

Yes, they acted like whiny thugs. It is obvious how Hortensis May 2016 #20

One Thinks One Misunderstood - One Validated The Point That One Provided Only Opinion - So Typical cantbeserious May 2016 #25

That's just your opinion. neener neener neener LOL boston bean May 2016 #26

One Admitted That One Provided Only An Opinion - See One's Post For Reference cantbeserious May 2016 #33

And??? Is this some revelation that people offer opinions on a political message board? boston bean May 2016 #34

Commenting On One's Opinion - Pointing Out That It Is Only An Opinion With Limited Import cantbeserious May 2016 #48

cool man.. boston bean May 2016 #50

Can't Speak For One - This Citizen Prefers Warm To Cool cantbeserious May 2016 #53

oh let me correct that opinion.. real warm man, real warm. boston bean May 2016 #54

Unless the people quoted in the RS article are actually arrested, that article is bullshit. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #59

I do believe there is a police investigation. boston bean May 2016 #62

I'm not saying no threats were made. I'm saying Rolling Stone has a track record of Warren DeMontague May 2016 #68

We can hope; but, more likely, he will dial down on the crazy RogueTrooper May 2016 #2

I would ask him to do that Arneoker May 2016 #12

His supporters have NO case for Nevada. Hortensis May 2016 #31

Yes, I understand that, and acknowledged that general point in my post Arneoker May 2016 #64

Sorry, Arneoker, I don't accept a "both sides were at fault" Hortensis May 2016 #71

Video shows otherwise. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #5

I've listened to the Voice mail and read the texts and read interviews where they have spoken to the boston bean May 2016 #7

Something was taken from them. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #8

And just how were they disenfranchised? boston bean May 2016 #9

You either don't know the rules of the NV caucus... bobbobbins01 May 2016 #11

Answer the question. What was taken from them? boston bean May 2016 #14

I answered that in my first post. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #16

They were disenfranchised while attempting to disenfranchise the rightful winners voters? boston bean May 2016 #18

So you don't know the rules of the caucus? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #21

LOL. Sanders did not win the NV Caucuses. WTF? boston bean May 2016 #23

You don't know the rules. Read them. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #27

I'm educated enough to understand that Hillary won the NV caucus boston bean May 2016 #30

You don't know the rules and you're lying. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #35

I'm not a liar. And I know Hillary won the NV Caucus. boston bean May 2016 #38

You lied. There was no gaming of the system. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #42

LOL. boston bean May 2016 #44

You got that right. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #47

The rules, the rules, the rules, that didn't allow BSers to overturn the will of caucus goers. boston bean May 2016 #49

Of course it does, here are the rules: bobbobbins01 May 2016 #52

OK Section III allows BSers to attempt to overturn the will of caucus goers... and damnit, us boston bean May 2016 #55

So you admit that it is in the rules. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #56

the rules didn't allow them to steal delegates... boston bean May 2016 #57

Section III, A, 3, a, 2, c bobbobbins01 May 2016 #61

bye! boston bean May 2016 #63

there are THREE tiers RazBerryBeret May 2016 #58

It's done now, aint it. And the will of actual caucus goers was upheld. boston bean May 2016 #60

No, you are supporting a fascist overturning of the will of the voters. nt stevenleser May 2016 #40

I'm supporting the rules, which you don't know. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #43

Nope, you are not supporting the rules. You are supporting an attempt to game them. stevenleser May 2016 #45

Where were the rules gamed? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #51

And that's all that matters. Sanders supporters are mad they can't overturn the will of the voters. stevenleser May 2016 #37

My video evidence shows that on caucus day, the voters voted 52% for Hillary and 47% for Sanders stevenleser May 2016 #17

So you don't know the rules either. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #22

I'm not opining on the rules Sanders supporters tried to game. Thanks for playing. nt stevenleser May 2016 #24

Willful ignorance is your stance? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #29

Nope, I'm not responding to your strawmen. You shouldnt speak if you arent responding on point. nt stevenleser May 2016 #32

Which strawman is that? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #39

That's your strawman. nt stevenleser May 2016 #41

I'm still trying to figure it all out but I think the issue was process related. aikoaiko May 2016 #13

Yup, all this nonsense was over Sanders supporters trying to game the system after Hillary won stevenleser May 2016 #19

Sexist post. There were plenty of women at the NV convention berni_mccoy May 2016 #28

You really only know one song, don't you? nt Bonobo May 2016 #36

All of these young men feeling the bern and feeling like something was taken from them in NV. jmousso75 May 2016 #46

If Sanders drops out while it's still mathematically possible to win Bad Dog May 2016 #65

It is not mathematically possible for him to win. boston bean May 2016 #66

Sure it is. If he wins 70% or so of the remaining delegates he'll have a majority Recursion May 2016 #67

He's not dropping out before all the primaries are over. That's simply not happening. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #70

young men? I saw quite a few women in the photos ,I find it precious you Hillary folk always m-lekktor May 2016 #69

Drop out?! LMAO You don't like the rules now? WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2016 #72

Yeah, I mean, fuck all the women that were effected. frylock May 2016 #73