Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

LOL! merrily May 2016 #1
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000 Faux pas May 2016 #3
I know, right? merrily May 2016 #4
For sure! Faux pas May 2016 #8
Sander's rally attendees have parents that give them a ride to the rally, but not the polling place. LexVegas May 2016 #2
. merrily May 2016 #6
Plus they won't stay off my grass! QC May 2016 #9
Loved that! :) LiberalFighter May 2016 #19
Thank you so much every one of these sort of posts are worth their weight in gold azurnoir May 2016 #29
(it ain't because of fraud) stonecutter357 May 2016 #5
Excellent, excellent post. auntpurl May 2016 #7
It's been amazingly ironic that the candidate winning the most votes has been called... BobbyDrake May 2016 #10
Sanders camp is into gas lighting, they're trying to make a point that Obama wasnt a long shot in 08 uponit7771 May 2016 #22
You have NO way of knowing this. It's just what you believe! Election theft is hard to wrap your ViseGrip May 2016 #11
PS. I believe unlike you, she isn't really winning anything! 12 point deviations??? ViseGrip May 2016 #13
We spend money and military to make sure that the outcome is what we want in elections elsewhere Txbluedog May 2016 #15
You need to have evidence of fraud KingFlorez May 2016 #16
You guys have broadened the definition of 'fraud' to include any election Sanders does not win. LanternWaste May 2016 #42
Can't get enough people to fill a big event... scscholar May 2016 #12
See he can't hold small campaign events Txbluedog May 2016 #14
kick auntpurl May 2016 #17
It also helps explain -again- what I see as the most glaring 'defect' of Sanders. randome May 2016 #18
WHOA!! Fewer dem endorsements than Cruz... wow... See, it'd be different if he had 50 and Clinton ha uponit7771 May 2016 #21
And the 'wrongness' doesn't prevent his ideas from being heard or his work going undone. randome May 2016 #24
That is particularly damning, because if there's anyone who f'ing hates Cruz more than we do auntpurl May 2016 #23
I think the 'distaste' directed at Sanders is of a different sort, though. randome May 2016 #25
Yeah, I'm increasingly convinced Cruz is a stack of ferrets in a trench coat auntpurl May 2016 #28
Um, thanks for that image. I think. randome May 2016 #35
I know, I know, sorry. auntpurl May 2016 #38
He's difficult to work with KingFlorez May 2016 #26
Some say... dchill May 2016 #33
His lack of endorsements says everything KingFlorez May 2016 #36
In 2008, Hillary couldn't afford... dchill May 2016 #39
Sanders also ignored the dem base; Blacks, Hispanics, women's issues and homogenized them into uponit7771 May 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #27
It is what it is KingFlorez May 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #40
Good tagline, BTW. libdem4life May 2016 #30
I wouldn't claim great charisma for Sanders, either... Orsino May 2016 #32
One very important reason is that few over 50 vote for him. tonyt53 May 2016 #34
As a Bernie supporter, I can agree with that. And yet, the Democratic Party and Hillary would do highprincipleswork May 2016 #37
B.S. The corporate media has been manipulating the process for months. Skwmom May 2016 #41
Nice summary. Thanks for posting. nt eastwestdem May 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A simple explaination why...»Reply #9