2016 Postmortem

JudyM

(29,769 posts)

38. Hopefully half of them wont find themselves mysteriously registered republicans on primary day.

Reply to Doctor_J (Reply #16)

Thu May 19, 2016, 11:18 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton to Californians: Your Votes Will Not Affect the Democratic Primary Whatsoever [View all] GeorgiaPeanuts May 2016 OP

As a California voter I'm happy to assure you that she is correct. ucrdem May 2016 #1

I'm in CA too, and couldn't be happier that our presidential votes don't matter! nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #6

After the Revelations That Will be coming Out In The Next Two weeks She Will Be Down For The Count! CorporatistNation May 2016 #7

You keep talking about something coming but never say what it is. brush May 2016 #8

This time it really is the rapture. No, really it's this time. Ok, next time. Next time! YouDig May 2016 #12

Revelation ucrdem May 2016 #17

.. frylock May 2016 #26

You're persistent at lease, and hopeful. Not that grounded in reality though. brush May 2016 #35

Oh, it's happening. frylock May 2016 #39

Yeah, yeah. Keep praying. brush May 2016 #43

I'm atheist. frylock May 2016 #44

Stop praying then. It still ain't gonna happen. No criminal intent, no indictment. brush May 2016 #46

No clue ^^ frylock May 2016 #47

Frylock, thank you for your existence here Ned_Devine May 2016 #52

But, Officer, I didn't intend to go over 1.0 when I had that last drink before I drove leveymg May 2016 #54

You again, the resident Sanders pusher of the "coming Clinton indictment". You should . . . brush May 2016 #59

I agree that an indictment is unlikely. However, FBI will find she violated her security agreement, leveymg May 2016 #60

You should be wishing that doesn't happen either as Sanders will then lose in that scenario . . . brush May 2016 #61

I'm thinking there's a Biden-Warren "Unity Ticket" ready and waiting in the wings. leveymg May 2016 #62

nonoo.. Flighty McFlight May 2016 #67

The minimum she could get is still a felony. Flighty McFlight May 2016 #66

There will be no cavalry riding to Sanders' rescue. brush May 2016 #68

In my case it won't be a breakdown, too old and too many times disappointed by pols for that. moriah May 2016 #50

Samesies! Starry Messenger May 2016 #51

She's right...Clinton will have enough Delegates from what she gets in New Jersey. brooklynite May 2016 #2

No she won't. She needs 255 pledged delegates to clinch. morningfog May 2016 #28

No, she needs 2,383 Delegate to win... brooklynite May 2016 #34

You agree that the pledged delegate winner will be and should ne morningfog May 2016 #36

Yes...and unless you imagine that Sanders will win California by 70%, it'll be Clinton. brooklynite May 2016 #37

Then it's a race to secure 2,026 pledged delegates. morningfog May 2016 #42

^^Thank you! You are 100% correct. nt silvershadow May 2016 #71

We will fucking see about that. onecaliberal May 2016 #3

Meaning what? grossproffit May 2016 #27

The world will be watching California, could be quite a embarrasment for Clinton. pinskinny May 2016 #4

The great thing about being so far in the lead is that all she has to do is wait until a couple anotherproletariat May 2016 #9

She needs more than 100 delegates to secure the nomination... GeorgiaPeanuts May 2016 #11

I was waiting for that. Hillary need less than 100 more total delegates. anotherproletariat May 2016 #14

Super delegates do not count till the convention, so you will have to deal with what pinskinny May 2016 #21

Let see how the MSM handles that. Of course she won't officially be the nominee, but they will call anotherproletariat May 2016 #22

Yep. ucrdem May 2016 #23

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #53

and they didn't count until the convention in 2008 onenote May 2016 #24

I know. Bernie is going to win California by 158%! grossproffit May 2016 #29

It's possible she clinches with a 4 lose night. morningfog May 2016 #30

Obama lost CA in 2008 Renew Deal May 2016 #41

Born and raised in CA, I appreciate her giving the straight facts. nt BootinUp May 2016 #5

Who knew that math would be such a touchy subject? grossproffit May 2016 #31

Some of are waiting for the FBI Lady to Sing. libdem4life May 2016 #10

I'm going to vote for her in the California primary The Second Stone May 2016 #13

wow I am a double loser oldandhappy May 2016 #15

Almost a million NEW voters registered in California. She would like it if they stay home Doctor_J May 2016 #16

And they're all voting for Bernie? n/t NanceGreggs May 2016 #32

Hopefully half of them wont find themselves mysteriously registered republicans on primary day. JudyM May 2016 #38

Californians understand how this works jaceaf May 2016 #18

Whenever I hear anyone saying anything like that, it's like they know, or think the fix is in place. -none May 2016 #19

Umm, do you expect people to find the part that concerns you in a 25 minute video? bettyellen May 2016 #20

She's just trying to downplay her inevitable loss in Cali. frylock May 2016 #25

Yeah, it sure sunk Obama in 08 auntpurl May 2016 #57

Hillary is no Obama. frylock May 2016 #58

another anti-democracy move by the annointed one amborin May 2016 #33

Hillary will have won the nomination before California stops voting. Renew Deal May 2016 #40

Wrong: she needs 670 of the 781 remaining PDs to reach 2383 k8conant May 2016 #49

Ugh pmorlan1 May 2016 #45

more BS from the BS crowd - its ok when bernie says he is going win but bad when she says it msongs May 2016 #48

At least when she says it it's true. LOL barrow-wight May 2016 #55

Where does she say that in that way to California? barrow-wight May 2016 #56

She doesn't... JSup May 2016 #69

hehehehe barrow-wight May 2016 #70

When was the last time CA mattered? Mz Pip May 2016 #63

Omg! She is painfully, mindnumbingly boring! Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #64

Acting like she won already felix_numinous May 2016 #65