Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
57. When David Brock and the big fucks speak... it's about with numbers
Fri May 20, 2016, 05:42 AM
May 2016

Can't keep the big liar from winning now, plus, it's the math. It's not who votes, but who COUNTS them.

This won't surprise anyone if it's Trump against her, with or without an indictment, she's gonna loose by 10 points... at least. Besides her lying, she voted for the fucking war, and when the Monica Lewinsky thing came up, she seized on that to get the sympathy vote.

It's such a bullshit move. In particular, if they are SO confident at this point.

On edit:
The DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S Super-Delegates, who previously did not exist, should be created to curb the people the party represents, should the people's numbers become too big to push their ideas to those who represent them!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because the nominees are a foregone conclusion at this point and exit polls are really expensive Recursion May 2016 #1
Sounds.... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #48
That's their "excuse" for doing so. But it's a pathetic veneer of an excuse. mhatrw May 2016 #62
Rigged! bkkyosemite May 2016 #2
Because they are trying to steal it from Bernie !!!!! BootinUp May 2016 #3
Ya...what's up with this place lately? Cali_Democrat May 2016 #6
Everything has been a conspiracy for months. This is not a new phenomenom. LonePirate May 2016 #20
when there are actual conspiracies AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #29
forget the big networks. Is anyone else doing exit polls? floppyboo May 2016 #5
What! Next you wI'll be telling us that campaigns should do LuvLoogie May 2016 #8
um, no. But why trust the media at this point. Really? floppyboo May 2016 #10
adding to above - and deleting my edit in #10 floppyboo May 2016 #18
Here in America and I am sure in Canada LiberalFighter May 2016 #35
Yeah, I was being sarcastic. But I can't see any campaign having LuvLoogie May 2016 #23
I'm not aware of campaigns doing exit polls on election day. LiberalFighter May 2016 #39
As a poll worker in a number of elections, my experience here in California, the campaigns do their 2banon May 2016 #45
That is not an exit poll. LiberalFighter May 2016 #52
If there is good GOTV, you already have asked all those voters who they are supporting..... bettyellen May 2016 #63
Yep! LiberalFighter May 2016 #64
My neighbors are adults and if they haven't registered by this time in their lives TexasTowelie May 2016 #50
Did you leave off the sarcasm gif? Campaigns do do their own voter registration brush May 2016 #34
Campaigns generally don't do Exit Polls. Eric J in MN May 2016 #21
I agree with you. LiberalFighter May 2016 #41
First they came for the exit polls, but I was not an exit poll, so... YouDig May 2016 #7
The corporatocracy gets what the corporatocracy wants. Snarkoleptic May 2016 #9
So what? PufPuf23 May 2016 #11
Not true. All the swings favor clinton. Sad, but true. and statistically almost impossible. FourScore May 2016 #15
I was being sarcastic. eom PufPuf23 May 2016 #17
The reason they had done exit polls was because they were very accurate in predicting who pdsimdars May 2016 #74
I was neing sarcastic with, "So what" for PufPuf23 May 2016 #79
Hmm nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #12
curious. are anomolies in exit polls just cause for fraud or simply an indication of possible fraud? floppyboo May 2016 #19
Well we are a very small paper nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #26
thanks for that. I think. it's all a bit disheartening... floppyboo May 2016 #32
As my husband likes to point out nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #36
2000 was a watershed moment in our history. Rex May 2016 #69
Exactomubdo nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #73
But we will continue to finance them in foreign countries to make sure there is no fraud jillan May 2016 #13
Isn't that odd? NWCorona May 2016 #22
US AID even finances that nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #27
But the American electorate can't connect the dots. NWCorona May 2016 #31
Yes, but let's be honest, nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #38
Might want to read Chapter 3 in your link Godhumor May 2016 #43
And they are still used nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #46
Chapter 3 talks all about Ukraine in the case studies Godhumor May 2016 #49
+1 cui bono May 2016 #76
Out of curiosity, could you point to actual evidence that this allegation is true? brooklynite May 2016 #14
I think you can probably guess the answer to that question Godhumor May 2016 #30
oh dear you forgot a link to any legitimate source for your claims, just a bernie propaganda blog nt msongs May 2016 #16
Oh good lord. This shit is stupifying Godhumor May 2016 #24
What exactly will these exit polls tells us with regard to the Dem primary? LonePirate May 2016 #25
Find a real source in any one of the media outlets. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #28
Please. Nt moriah May 2016 #47
Where are Mulder and Scully when you need them? barrow-wight May 2016 #33
Well, then you won't mind if we let this play out. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #37
I do mind. barrow-wight May 2016 #44
Following quick on the heels of the DNC decision to do this too. bjo59 May 2016 #40
But, but, but, what will the Broletariat use to invent conspiracy theories with if The Second Stone May 2016 #42
Precursor to more fraud ThePhilosopher04 May 2016 #51
Sigh.... workinclasszero May 2016 #53
Duh..92 more delegates and Hillary wins why waste money? beachbumbob May 2016 #54
Because they are for profit corps... NCTraveler May 2016 #55
Where is the link to this,other than CT sites? I'm sufrommich May 2016 #56
When David Brock and the big fucks speak... it's about with numbers MrMickeysMom May 2016 #57
Because the primary battle has been over for a while Gothmog May 2016 #58
The MSM "knew" Hillary was the nominee two years ago elehhhhna May 2016 #78
K&R. IF true, it would be shocking. Yet, not surprising. nt silvershadow May 2016 #59
Because they cost money and they are no longer relevant. Codeine May 2016 #60
Waste of time and effort. DCBob May 2016 #61
Because the exit polls have largely sucked Dem2 May 2016 #65
Jesus. They aren't even pretending anymore... AzDar May 2016 #66
Yes trudyco May 2016 #71
Translation: Evidence our news providers have no interest in being our watchdog, they are choosing Todays_Illusion May 2016 #67
Well the M$M is just a division of Wall Street. Kind like the NYT is a CIA hub. Rex May 2016 #68
Big disparities on the Dem side, mostly spot-on on the GOP side. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #70
Planning a lot of cheating for HRC. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #72
Let's get some election monitors from outside the country please. UN? Where are you??? cui bono May 2016 #75
ALCOA! FSogol May 2016 #77
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»HEADS UP!! Big Networks C...»Reply #57