Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let's not let the GOP decide who we nominate. YouDig May 2016 #1
Disingenuous: for months, you guys have been peddling the lie that we should pick Clinton Betty Karlson May 2016 #18
I've only been here a month. We should pick Hillary because she won more votes. YouDig May 2016 #19
Caucuses yield fewer votes than primaries. The number itself tell us very little. Betty Karlson May 2016 #20
270 elected delegates. Game over! YouDig May 2016 #21
Neither Clinton nor Sanders have the pledged delegates to win outright. Game on. Betty Karlson May 2016 #24
This is crazy thinking. I happen to like democracy. boston bean May 2016 #2
I like it to. Cool concept! What country are you referring to where such things that happens? Katashi_itto May 2016 #4
So you would be against the superdelegates then? flor-de-jasmim May 2016 #8
I'm for superdelegates going with who the people in the Democratic Primary chose boston bean May 2016 #9
Hmmm, so you agree they should not make a statement of support ... flor-de-jasmim May 2016 #13
I think at this point it doesn't make one ounce of difference. boston bean May 2016 #14
I'm not crying in my soup. I'm just saying... flor-de-jasmim May 2016 #15
What are you complaining about? The one with the most pledged delegates is the nominee. boston bean May 2016 #16
How about the Superdelegates had had an open mind from the beghinning? Armstead May 2016 #26
Why does that matter at this point to you? boston bean May 2016 #28
I agree madokie May 2016 #3
The "pardon herself" scenario is not going to happen AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #27
They would impeach (or at least try to) either Hillary or Bernie gollygee May 2016 #5
Why would they try to impeach Bernie? Merryland May 2016 #6
I'm working with history. For the past 20 years or so, they try to impeach Democratic presidents. gollygee May 2016 #30
Bernie? Nawwww pinebox May 2016 #22
They don't need real reasons. They make stuff up. N/t gollygee May 2016 #31
Sure they do but you need evidence for impeachment pinebox May 2016 #32
That's why I said "try to impeach" n/t gollygee May 2016 #35
You're just making things up. They won't try to impeach Bernie. Don't be silly. pdsimdars May 2016 #29
They are not going to impeach her. They have nothing BootinUp May 2016 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #10
Glad I could help you this morning. nt BootinUp May 2016 #11
They are already calling for it pinebox May 2016 #23
Sounds like Red meat to the tea party. nt BootinUp May 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #36
Everything you have written here is wrong oberliner May 2016 #12
re your #2 tk2kewl May 2016 #17
Some huuuuge assumptions there in your analysis. kstewart33 May 2016 #33
Bernie is not going to be president BainsBane May 2016 #34
Hillary should drop out gracefully, and negotiate a pardon privately One Black Sheep May 2016 #37
If it isn't Bernie, in all liklihood it will be Trump and they will go at her with everything they pdsimdars May 2016 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's best outcome is...»Reply #25