Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]bvf
(6,604 posts)54. What a ridiculous question.
You may as well have said, "Court testimony is always true, right?"
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
165 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If we found just a few that did care, that could go a long way. Apologies, Mr. Ralston? Ms. DWS???
reformist2
May 2016
#5
I would love to see just ONE Hillary supporter with enough integrity to admit that...
bvar22
May 2016
#160
the way the ran with this total bullshit tells me they are in full panic mode.
litlbilly
May 2016
#9
Last nite on twitter there were a ton of tweets slamming Bernie about visiting the Vatican....
jillan
May 2016
#100
"Hillary Supporters Do Not Care" is the take-away message of this entire primary
Scootaloo
May 2016
#95
Please do not care if they care. The truth is no less true if someone denies it.
merrily
May 2016
#131
One guy starts to lose it, then others talk him down and he never even throws it.
Dustlawyer
May 2016
#132
The 64 Bernie Delegates were given over a month to prove their Democrat status
itsrobert
May 2016
#84
Interesting that you talk about video and show a still while claiming proof.
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2016
#93
“A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boots on.” - Terry Pratchett
EndElectoral
May 2016
#12
That phrase is no longer true. With the internet, the truth stamps out the lies instantly.
reformist2
May 2016
#21
His testimony wouldn't be inadmissible. It would just be totally discredited.
Jim Lane
May 2016
#148
liar, racist, sexist, mysogynist, using the Pope to win catholic votes, now violent
passiveporcupine
May 2016
#24
Yet strangely, all 100% applicable to Clinton's campaign (Well, except the Pope thing, I guess.)
Scootaloo
May 2016
#98
I was appalled. Or sickened. Maybe shamed. (What is the word of the day?)
Luminous Animal
May 2016
#45
Ralston, like Capehart... when proven to be a LIAR... will say NOTHING. Pretend it never happened.
AzDar
May 2016
#36
The truth shall be revealed, and it shall set you free. But only if you pay attention after the 24
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#51
Or the folks rushing the stage, and the screaming, and the threatening the woman and her family
Number23
May 2016
#121
Why was the chair picked up in the first place, was it poor judgement of the person
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#82
Put those goalposts down and start another thread if you want to. This one's about lying.
DisgustipatedinCA
May 2016
#94
Changes nothing because we've all seen the enraged chair guy that had to be controlled.
ucrdem
May 2016
#96
Pretty desperate for a reason not to apologize and admit wrong. Why am I not surprised?
snowy owl
May 2016
#113
It does not matter. Clinton, the Democratic Establishment, and the Corp Media will continue to
Skwmom
May 2016
#99
Hillary and her supporters have as much in common with the truth as W has with intelligence
Doctor_J
May 2016
#102
So how many times has this lie travelled around the world before the truth could tie its shoes? n/t
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#110
Thanks, Autumn. Now an apology is in order. Lange? Boxer? DWS? Ralston? Clinton?
snowy owl
May 2016
#112
Perhaps next, Snopes can work on DWS's that she's been neutral in this Presidential primary.
merrily
May 2016
#129
Oh my goodness, it's the "Chair Conspiracy" now. Oh no! Call the FBI! A chair, a chair, a chair!!!
RBInMaine
May 2016
#130
Perhaps we could call Clint Eastwood...he has an interesting experience with a chair.
libdem4life
May 2016
#139
Sadly, the damage is done, and this "Democratic" crew will move on to the next disgusting ploy
ScreamingMeemie
May 2016
#138
At this point it doesn't matter what he *might* have done w. the chair.
Smarmie Doofus
May 2016
#158