2016 Postmortem

840high

(17,196 posts)

57. How would you know?

Reply to tonyt53 (Reply #6)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:51 PM

May 2016

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State Departments statement about Hillary Email problem had me Upset with Her [View all] MariaThinks May 2016 OP

Because the media hates the Clintons. hrmjustin May 2016 #1

This. Republicans created the problem scscholar May 2016 #56

Nice graphic MariaThinks May 2016 #65

Thanks! hrmjustin May 2016 #70

Once again... NV Whino May 2016 #2

right on schedule. niyad May 2016 #5

Actually, her setup was far more secure than what Powell or Rice used. tonyt53 May 2016 #6

Evidence for that claim? cali May 2016 #9

+1. It was running unsecured without encryption for 2 months in 2009. yodermon May 2016 #33

Guccifer vouches for her security. :D Two wrongs apparently make a right. roguevalley May 2016 #59

kick MariaThinks May 2016 #10

SAYS WHO? Bob41213 May 2016 #11

So concerned about national security MariaThinks May 2016 #66

Bullshit think May 2016 #15

One had 128 bit encryption and the other had open ports with outdated and highly vulnerable NWCorona May 2016 #25

How many supposedly extremely secure US government servers have been hacked? tonyt53 May 2016 #26

There's all kinds of problems with that post. NWCorona May 2016 #28

You mean when it was running without encryption for 2 months in 2009? yodermon May 2016 #38

Rice and Powell did nothing like what Hillary did. 2cannan May 2016 #43

How would you know? 840high May 2016 #57

The government had such outdated computers it was laughable brush May 2016 #54

That, however true it may be, is not under discussion. NV Whino May 2016 #62

when we point out that previous sec's did the same thing, we are told, "oh, no, what she did was soo niyad May 2016 #3

Because that claim is false. cali May 2016 #12

only worse because it was hillary. i hear the power cord hillary used was much longer MariaThinks May 2016 #13

Either you know nothing about computers or you are intentionally putting your fingers in your ear karynnj May 2016 #41

i'm always astounding by how much so called progressives can hate her MariaThinks May 2016 #30

You and others have called comments that were pretty close to this report's conclusions karynnj May 2016 #48

Nobody on the board has a say in the final outcome yeoman6987 May 2016 #35

Read the report. What she did was completely different and she tried to hide it. morningfog May 2016 #69

Sort of odd, isn't it? tonyt53 May 2016 #4

She went way beyond "previous" problems. And it was intentional berni_mccoy May 2016 #7

Yes. +1 840high May 2016 #58

Translation: They're all at fault and showed poor leadership. bigwillq May 2016 #8

No one gave a shot then, weren't tech savvy and tech world wasn't brought to them. Realty. seabeyond May 2016 #19

I guess that rules out Condi Rice or Powell as Trump VPs. karynnj May 2016 #49

Other Bush officials used private servers too: CrowCityDem May 2016 #14

one of the many things they should have been prosecuted for... think May 2016 #16

Um, let's see, I don't see the SoS mentioned here NV Whino May 2016 #21

Awesome that HRC takes her lead on email security from the Bush criminal cabal. yodermon May 2016 #40

Well if everybody else did it then it must be ok ciaobaby May 2016 #52

Nowhere near as "private" as Hillary's, but a non-government" (GOP) server. merrily May 2016 #53

Where in the piece is your quote? bunnies May 2016 #17

Exactly. Thank you. I just had this conversation and until it goes beyond all the others, I don't seabeyond May 2016 #18

Did previous SOS use a PRIVATE SERVER? Skwmom May 2016 #20

But, according to Hillary, this is the most secure private email server any SOS ever had.... Bob41213 May 2016 #22

k & r LAS14 May 2016 #23

Cool. She did what Republicans did. Matt_in_STL May 2016 #24

I got a parking ticket and my Buddy got a DUI. But we both did something wrong so its the same. inchhigh May 2016 #27

Sorry. Even in the words you cite they say "her failures were singled out as more serious". Because highprincipleswork May 2016 #29

Because previous SoS did not take it to the degree Clinton did. jeff47 May 2016 #31

The report answers this for you jmg257 May 2016 #32

her failures were singled out as more serious." bahrbearian May 2016 #34

"Why has this problem been put on Hillary" is a good question Tarc May 2016 #36

but, to hear people, even here, gender has NOTHING to do with the vitriol and hatred niyad May 2016 #39

Bull pucky NV Whino May 2016 #63

Here's why Hills is different TeddyR May 2016 #37

Top Clinton aide was warned...and dismissed those worries.... KoKo May 2016 #50

She used her own private server and an 'adviser' blacklisted by Obama - away from polly7 May 2016 #42

You were never upset with her LondonReign2 May 2016 #44

You can't read my mind. I was very upset. MariaThinks May 2016 #45

Sure. Of course you were LondonReign2 May 2016 #47

More serious" means more serious. Previous SOS did not used home servers. Not conventional practice. snowy owl May 2016 #46

You need to do more thinking, Maria, and spend less time trying to excuse Hillary's errors. BillZBubb May 2016 #51

Darn that barn door and all of those horses Sheepshank May 2016 #55

Everything is Hillary's fault. JoePhilly May 2016 #60

True. And suddenly his approval ratings have shot up over 50% MariaThinks May 2016 #64

The only people who care about archiving emails rusty fender May 2016 #61

There were more comprehensive directives in place during Clinton's tenure so her failures Autumn May 2016 #67

It is not a new article ...was discussed Demsrule86 May 2016 #68