2016 Postmortem

grasswire

(50,130 posts)

75. I don't know if SoS answers to them collectively...

Reply to 2banon (Reply #74)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:46 PM

May 2016

...and I don't think individually. I just have seen the NSC mentioned as having dangerous teeth in this matter.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

APNewsBreak: State Dept audit faults Clinton in emails [View all] nadinbrzezinski May 2016 OP

It's the quickening! NWCorona May 2016 #1

The three reactions under you tell me all, nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #6

Yeah me too! The pdf hasn't been added to the state department website yet. NWCorona May 2016 #8

Do me a favor, once it is posted, send me a link nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #14

Pm sent! 😀 NWCorona May 2016 #16

Here's the one on the Wapo Bob41213 May 2016 #12

I am looking for a copy I can download nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #15

Click the link, or right click the link. You can download. Bob41213 May 2016 #17

It is already in my computer nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #18

Clinton once again helps government focus on problems. Give her credit, she'll take her slap on the Hoyt May 2016 #2

Sarcasm, right? lagomorph777 May 2016 #10

Hillary "helps the Government focus on problems" by causing them... Unbelievable!! (not really) AzDar May 2016 #69

Forget the criticism by Sanders supporters cali May 2016 #20

Trump can be countered with his draft-dodging, business failures, racism, etc. Fact is, the email Hoyt May 2016 #34

The litany of Trump's sins is almost endless, but he's still a hard target cali May 2016 #42

That post sounds like an ad for GOPers. Hoyt May 2016 #46

Can't wait for Trump to use this nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #25

His supporters- like you -will touch this email equivalent of jaywalking and give comfort to GOPers. Hoyt May 2016 #35

I guess you got me nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #59

He doesn't have to, his supporters and staff will do it for him. Hoyt May 2016 #63

How exciting for you! Beausoir May 2016 #55

Well Friday should be a hoot nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #60

Hubris. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Lord Acton Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #3

Funny. I remember Hillary saying this. trudyco May 2016 #22

They faulted Powell and Rice too Demsrule86 May 2016 #4

And berners drag it over here workinclasszero May 2016 #23

So let me get this straight nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #26

Why do I keep getting the feeling you are a Republican apologist? MoonRiver May 2016 #48

Insert twilight zone music now nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #49

I call it like I see it. MoonRiver May 2016 #51

And it will be fun to see you guys go into nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #61

If you want to see me in a fetal position, you will need to wait until I'm on my death bed. MoonRiver May 2016 #64

So posting an AP breaking news story is HATE nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #66

They all did it. She did it A LOT inchhigh May 2016 #28

Remind me where Rice and Powell kept their private servers. merrily May 2016 #41

Still pasting that stale talking point? No new memo today? arcane1 May 2016 #56

Powell and Rice aren't running for President. thesquanderer May 2016 #72

"and past secretaries of state". Beausoir May 2016 #5

"but her failures were singled out as more serious. " lagomorph777 May 2016 #11

^^^This^^^ Autumn May 2016 #38

Read the report. What she did is far far worse. morningfog May 2016 #54

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/03/07/state-dept-concludes-past-secretaries-of-state/209044 Demsrule86 May 2016 #7

Really? Better tell the State Dept they got the date wrong Bob41213 May 2016 #9

Memorandums and reports are different critters nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #19

lol @ Media Matters. frylock May 2016 #24

I need clarity on who would be "senior officials" other than Obama? 2banon May 2016 #13

There are a few others including those within the Intel community nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #21

hmm.. 2banon May 2016 #27

What you missing is that they are damned if they do, and damned if they don't nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #29

If she gets the nomination and then gets elected, we are looking at impeachment the very next day merbex May 2016 #47

Yes. HRC supporters make light of this, to our detriment. 2banon May 2016 #58

Regardless that is a critical decision always nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #67

That's what I have always assumed, and what everyone should assume 2banon May 2016 #52

From what I have heard from folks in the intel community nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #68

Finally turned on my radio today. (just a bit ago) 2banon May 2016 #73

there is something called the National Security Council. grasswire May 2016 #71

Interesting, grasswire thanks. 2banon May 2016 #74

I don't know if SoS answers to them collectively... grasswire May 2016 #75

Yes, that I do know. For Decades. 2banon May 2016 #76

It's a good time to buy butthurt ointment futures. HooptieWagon May 2016 #30

Can I ask you to stop with that butt hurt joke nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #31

It is not a gay slur, origin is a spanking reference. HooptieWagon May 2016 #36

Please proceed then nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #43

I'm gay, and it isn't a gay slur obamanut2012 May 2016 #40

Ohmigod!!!!!!!!!!!! zappaman May 2016 #32

OH MY GOD< this is so predictable nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #33

And yet it hasn't hit them.. Ichingcarpenter May 2016 #37

As well as your glee! zappaman May 2016 #62

The fact that you can read my mind over the internet makes you some kind of a mind reader nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #65

I think is validates our concerns with Hillary as a nominee. morningfog May 2016 #57

*** IG's Report states that Colin Powell followed rules in place at that time; Clinton did not.*** JudyM May 2016 #39

I honestly think this took team Hillary by surprise nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #44

Really? Why? You think Kerry/Obama wouldn't have given her a heads up? JudyM May 2016 #45

The way these reports work nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #70

"..also revealed that Clinton and her top aides chose not to cooperate with the review. " EndElectoral May 2016 #50

"Despite guidelines to the contrary and never seeking approval" n/t arcane1 May 2016 #53