Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
21. The conclusion of the OIG report.
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:24 PM
May 2016

The conclusion of the OIG report.

CONCLUSION
Longstanding, systemic weaknesses related to electronic records and communications have existed within the Office of the Secretary that go well beyond the tenure of any one Secretary of State. OIG recognizes that technology and Department policy have evolved considerably since Secretary Albright’s tenure began in 1997. Nevertheless, the Department generally and the Office of the Secretary in particular have been slow to recognize and to manage effectively the legal requirements and cybersecurity risks associated with electronic data communications, particularly as those risks pertain to its most senior leadership. OIG expects that its recommendations will move the Department steps closer to meaningfully addressing these risks.



Recommendations of the OIG report.

RECOMMENDATIONS
To ensure compliance with Federal and Department requirements regarding records preservation and use of non-Departmental systems, OIG has issued the following recommendations to the Bureau of Administration, the Office of the Secretary, the Bureau of Information Resources Management, the Bureau of Human Resources, and the Department’s Transparency Coordinator. Their complete responses can be found in Appendix B. The Department also provided technical comments that OIG incorporated as appropriate into this report.



There are 8 recommendations issued to the State Department by OIG.

State Department management responded to each recommendation.

The OIG replied in each case:

OIG Reply: OIG considers the recommendation resolved.

http://static.politico.com/f3/9b/19d29ab14abeb4a30ca2975f1e6c/oig-report.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MAY is the operative word here dana_b May 2016 #1
Cries of Benghazi to be replaced by Manilla? I hear the rumble of new Congressional hearings HereSince1628 May 2016 #25
Flouting FOIA will do that to you. nt MaeScott May 2016 #58
Will There Be Truth Or Consequences? Veracity And Character Are Of Paramount Importance... CorporatistNation May 2016 #100
This, plus the source is weak... scscholar May 2016 #81
Hmmm...wonder how Obama ever pulled off that Osama bin Laden operation with Hillary around Jitter65 Jun 2016 #113
Right. Bill Johnson has SUSPICIONS with no evidence, pnwmom Jun 2016 #119
Well, the first thread on this died a humble death. Don't expect anything different from this one. randome May 2016 #2
I think that would be a phone call that wasn't made using a STE. lagomorph777 May 2016 #71
NO PROOF. It says right there in the quoted section. Ridiculous creative speculation. Metric System May 2016 #3
Worse, not even an indication of any kind. greyl May 2016 #51
"Clinton came up with a work-around, Johnson says. “She had her aides go out, retrieve their phones" think May 2016 #4
Serious Demsrule86 May 2016 #12
"They appealed to Johnson for an exception, but he refused, citing alarms and lockdowns" think May 2016 #16
though he quickly adds they have “no proof.” MariaThinks May 2016 #5
For the first time in the primary process, I'm considering to get my fork out... eom Betty Karlson May 2016 #6
Leave it in Bernie , where it belongs . Nt pkdu May 2016 #33
Bernie belongs in the White House. Betty Karlson May 2016 #57
Good one! beltanefauve May 2016 #103
I'm sure he will be invited over by Hillary , sometime in Feb or March of 2017 I'd guess.. pkdu Jun 2016 #111
Now you are just trolling. Careful there. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #115
Jesus, this is now a deluge! nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #7
Even if this was true Trenzalore May 2016 #8
Good luck with that... think May 2016 #10
It is not true... Demsrule86 May 2016 #13
This isn't the Disneyland website. . .did you know that? pdsimdars May 2016 #34
You honestly think the super delegates and Hillary's delegates would nominate Sanders Trenzalore May 2016 #36
Ignore the candidate with millions of votes at your peril. nt appal_jack May 2016 #45
Grown ups do. pdsimdars May 2016 #66
Absolutely. I think that's why they have been calling him to drop out pdsimdars May 2016 #89
Some of us would be pleased enough by that lostnfound May 2016 #43
K & R lmbradford May 2016 #9
'May have'? kstewart33 May 2016 #11
I think she is done. reddread May 2016 #39
Are you saying that you don't yet know that all news media use the words "may, Cal33 May 2016 #74
Lol! zappaman May 2016 #14
;) sheshe2 May 2016 #49
she jeopardized national security all to keep her sideline hidden amborin May 2016 #15
... never end... kgnu_fan May 2016 #17
Did she not know what she was doing or did she just not jwirr May 2016 #18
I have to give you a K&R NCTraveler May 2016 #19
...though he quickly adds they have “no proof.” Tarc May 2016 #20
They had no proof on OJ either. JEB May 2016 #42
The conclusion of the OIG report. lunamagica May 2016 #21
Wow! Another excerpt. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #22
Wow. They had to take her out of the loop, that says a lot. DebDoo May 2016 #26
The breathtaking arrogance of Hillary on display. So much so, they cut her out of the loop Arazi May 2016 #35
Just the fact that it *could* be her fault is enough to make me cringe. Doesn't really matter if it DebDoo May 2016 #23
IF IT'S ALL CAPS Dem2 May 2016 #24
Go to the Newsweek article. They capped the headline. berni_mccoy May 2016 #27
I agree with the reddit rules Dem2 May 2016 #29
JUNE 14 MFM008 May 2016 #28
“sloppy communications with her senior staff” elleng May 2016 #30
K&R. nt Duval May 2016 #31
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2016 #32
I was just about to type a big old "YAWN" to this OP but I think your post is better Number23 May 2016 #38
Exactly; this adds phone calls to the e-mail problem lagomorph777 May 2016 #72
I agree...and I will add: the willingness to ignore her hubris noiretextatique May 2016 #87
Did you miss the part where it was her staff and not her re: the phone calls? Number23 May 2016 #93
Apparently you missed this part: lagomorph777 May 2016 #96
I guess I also missed where her staff, who actually did the behavior that has you guys so horrified, Number23 May 2016 #97
This is a Kerry investigation. lmbradford May 2016 #106
I don't think that one person in the universe thinks that Sanders has anything to do with this Number23 May 2016 #110
That blackberry phone was also not approved. lmbradford May 2016 #105
I have words.... sheshe2 May 2016 #50
You punked yourself! You should read the entire article SharonClark May 2016 #37
Only two words that matter:"No proof." okasha May 2016 #40
Only two words matter. Huh. I have a lot of students who have the same philosophy. bjo59 May 2016 #53
We're not talking about your students. okasha May 2016 #54
But is LAW the only source for measurement and guidance of moral behavior? HereSince1628 May 2016 #61
That her sheer irresponsibility and hubris may have cost even ONE life... I don't know how her AzDar May 2016 #41
it appears they don't care roguevalley May 2016 #44
WHAT THE F$&_ OMG HELL MyNameGoesHere May 2016 #46
Ancient Alien theorists believe ...!!!!! JoePhilly May 2016 #47
It all makes sense now... JSup May 2016 #48
We are now in Week 56 of HRC's campaign ... NanceGreggs May 2016 #52
You'd think after getting every prediction they've made wrong BainsBane May 2016 #59
Oh Nance, I'm so glad you joined the party! I miss you! berni_mccoy May 2016 #67
Hey, Berni! NanceGreggs May 2016 #94
Likewise Nance. berni_mccoy May 2016 #95
Eight years later, i much prefer being on the same side of the fence with you :) ruggerson May 2016 #108
Right back at ya! NanceGreggs May 2016 #109
Hillary will take down the Democratic Party FreakinDJ May 2016 #55
Lalalalalalalalalalalala noiretextatique May 2016 #56
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #60
Oh baloney. Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden forked over millions of docs. Intel survived. nt ucrdem May 2016 #62
By that reasoning and Hillary's own stance on those individuals, Hillary should be in prison. berni_mccoy May 2016 #65
Ok, so you agree Hillary should be in prison. Katashi_itto May 2016 #68
She forked over millions of classified intel docs? Do tell. nt ucrdem May 2016 #70
I dont recall them comproming counterintell operations. Katashi_itto May 2016 #77
More unfounded speculation just to hit Hillary. How about Snowden or Manning as the source? Jitter65 May 2016 #63
Only five more months of this, Hillary fans! vintx May 2016 #64
K&R nt Zorra May 2016 #69
He''s most likely wrong about the Philippeans --- BUT it is damning on its own Armstead May 2016 #73
It's never going to go away now Babel_17 May 2016 #75
"May" "If" "No Proof" emulatorloo May 2016 #76
Ancient Alien Theorists will be along shortly to confirm it. JoePhilly May 2016 #80
Can you please put that in all caps for me? emulatorloo May 2016 #82
PROOF? PROOF? We don't need no stinking PROOF!!!!! JoePhilly May 2016 #78
Recommended berni saidsimplesimon May 2016 #79
Kickin' Faux pas May 2016 #83
like it or not jonmac511 May 2016 #84
When in the hell are we going to learn? SmittynMo May 2016 #85
Accurate or not, this story is guaranteed to get traction The Blue Flower May 2016 #86
Could be this year's Benghazi. GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #88
Clinton Tipped Off The MILF? jberryhill May 2016 #90
At what point does a candidate become too high risk? felix_numinous May 2016 #91
It's slowly sinking in to the Faithful. libdem4life May 2016 #92
K & R AzDar May 2016 #98
I heard she bought live goldfish just to puree in a blender! tandem5 May 2016 #99
Bill who? annavictorious May 2016 #101
It says "telephone calls" and "have no proof". bullimiami May 2016 #102
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #104
I dont understand. lmbradford May 2016 #107
Pffft....Newsweek is as rightwing as they come. Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #112
i don't understand the op title. if anything it sounds like the state okieinpain Jun 2016 #114
LOL Bubry Jun 2016 #116
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #117
Why did you dig up an 11-day old post and another 6 day old post? Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #118
Welcome to DU, Bubry! pnwmom Jun 2016 #120
Thanks Bubry Jun 2016 #121
We still have to wait to see if we have a rule of law. If we don't, we don't really have a country pdsimdars Jun 2016 #122
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This message was self-del...»Reply #21