Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Uh-Oh! Hillary Clinton DID NOT Hand Over Key Emails Cited In Scathing State Department Report... [View all]Aerows
(39,961 posts)22. For the very reason that I mentioned.
Too limited of an ability to finely tune restriction to access.
It needs to rest with a few responsible individuals that put their careers on the line for failing at following procedure, a failsafe mechanism that can audit if procedures were violated, and an ability to constrain leaks that occur.
We already know there are failures left and right in this regard, but the names of assets whose lives were directly in danger were not compromised by Mr. Snowden no matter how affronted certain folks got by his revelations. An unencrypted server sitting out on the internet with national security data with :shudder: open goddamn ports :shudder: is a hell of a different ball game.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Uh-Oh! Hillary Clinton DID NOT Hand Over Key Emails Cited In Scathing State Department Report... [View all]
AzDar
May 2016
OP
Are we going to have another paranoid president - like Nixon? God help us!
Zen Democrat
May 2016
#55
I keep thinking about Paglianos missing months of emails... and his immunity deal...
JudyM
May 2016
#4
How are they expected to know about recordkeeping rules, though? There should've been a contract
JudyM
May 2016
#11
That doesn't define a broader range of responsibility, though. Not sure how you mean that would
JudyM
May 2016
#13
Ok I see where you're going with this. There's protection for the company. Two things are likely,
JudyM
May 2016
#21
Why the hell would someone at his level destroy all his emails -unless he were told to...
JudyM
May 2016
#18
I also keep thinking about her dumping tens of thousands of pages of paper on State instead of
JudyM
May 2016
#25
I think they were doing some shady dealings and didn't want to risk hiring a top tier IT firm out of
JudyM
May 2016
#30
See, that's going to bite her hard. She assumed the deluge would overwhelm the analytics.
JudyM
May 2016
#58
The emails from Cheryl Mills about the NSA refusal to clone the President's secure phone for Hillary
leveymg
May 2016
#34
Wah! Wah! I want what the President has! Cause I was supposed to be President!
Merryland
May 2016
#52
It's amazing how HRC's media surrogates are no better at defending this than DUers
HereSince1628
May 2016
#41