2016 Postmortem

Raine1967

(11,676 posts)

31. No, that's my statement.

Reply to 840high (Reply #30)

Sat May 28, 2016, 03:36 PM

May 2016

I have nothing to defend.

Please continue.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Barack_America May 2016 OP

is there a link? thanks n/t dana_b May 2016 #1

Sorry, not sure where it went. Barack_America May 2016 #7

Here Demsrule86 May 2016 #71

Probably calling her daughter upaloopa May 2016 #2

You do realize that it's not the possibility of someone listening to the call that is the problem, r vintx May 2016 #4

Don't expect IT literacy from anyone defending her use... Yurovsky May 2016 #8

Good point. It's been extremely beneficial to Hillary vintx May 2016 #9

Or just about anything else. Autumn May 2016 #66

yes, they apparently thinking "hacking" is done with an axe.. grasswire May 2016 #11

I'm sure it's all very confusing for Team Hillary... Yurovsky May 2016 #16

Ha! JudyM May 2016 #39

the OP went to the bottom of stinking RW sewer. enough said bye riversedge May 2016 #28

Right, strictly for yoga and wedding plans... Barack_America May 2016 #5

Really? You're really going to try this defense? Arazi May 2016 #6

How about this one. So what? Don't care. Blackberry, emails, tin cans. So what? Laser102 May 2016 #48

Lol. So right. These "scandal" conspiracies are Hortensis May 2016 #50

Yep. Wedding plans. 300,000 emails will validate that. JudyM May 2016 #38

That's not the point. Duval May 2016 #51

It's not illegal when the presumptive nominee does it. Fumesucker May 2016 #3

she ain't the presumptive nominee until California votes. nt grasswire May 2016 #12

and NJ and all all of the other states/territories dana_b May 2016 #14

Yay! Breitbart! Let's use sources that are 100% Republican lies to smear Democrats! Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #10

Are you alleging that they are lying about the deposition?? Wilms May 2016 #13

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #15

Nor should you. Wilms May 2016 #17

I believe posting links from RW sources is also against the TOS. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #18

If your life depended on you sorting this out, would you behave as you do? Wilms May 2016 #21

I never called anyone an asshole. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #23

Kerry initiated an investigation of this matter. Wilms May 2016 #26

new here but jonmac511 May 2016 #42

and this is why freepers are better informed.. grasswire May 2016 #20

Ask Hillary's most prolific poster today. Barack_America May 2016 #19

exactly. grasswire May 2016 #22

Sources matter. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #24

I like to visit google news. Barack_America May 2016 #25

And you give another RW link. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #27

You haven't been following this, have you? Judicial Watch is the plaintiff... Barack_America May 2016 #33

A right wing source reporting on a lawsuit by a right wing political organization. George II May 2016 #37

Quoting submitted legal documents and videotaped testimony. Barack_America May 2016 #40

i guess jonmac511 May 2016 #43

Welcome to DU and the unfortunate alternate reality that... Barack_America May 2016 #45

unfortunately jonmac511 May 2016 #47

Breitbart, REALLY? Raine1967 May 2016 #29

That's your defense? 840high May 2016 #30

No, that's my statement. Raine1967 May 2016 #31

Good God, it's a deposition. Barack_America May 2016 #32

you used a RW source. Raine1967 May 2016 #34

Yes, I don't believe Breitbart altered the deposition.. Barack_America May 2016 #35

Then why not find another source, rather than send site traffic to Breitbart. emulatorloo May 2016 #53

Find one an post it. Barack_America May 2016 #56

I'm not your research assistant. Just avoid the site that promotes James O'Keefe lie vids emulatorloo May 2016 #62

Sure, I'll restrict my sources to those of impeccable neutrality... Barack_America May 2016 #63

Right, that's just what I said. Don't shove words into mouth. emulatorloo May 2016 #68

Breitbart? George II May 2016 #36

Breitbart? Really? June 7th can't come soon enough. n/t BzaDem May 2016 #41

Breitbart. Uh huh. murielm99 May 2016 #44

How do you know it wasn't a plan to give false information to the Russians who were hacking the BB? Sancho May 2016 #46

16 more days of Breitbart links from Bernie supporters nt geek tragedy May 2016 #49

you get to read the Jonah Goldberg editorial in GD:P yesterday? emulatorloo May 2016 #55

TAke FIVE DAMN SECONDS and find a better source than BREITBART emulatorloo May 2016 #52

Try this. Not a single source from the "liberal" media printed this deposition. Barack_America May 2016 #54

Give it five or ten minutes. emulatorloo May 2016 #57

5 hours later, still nothing. Barack_America May 2016 #59

Hands up, who's surprised? vintx May 2016 #67

I saw her drown kittens... tandem5 May 2016 #58

Did she shoot a man in Reno, just to watch him die? nt tblue37 May 2016 #65

I'm sorry I cannot rec anything from breitbart. jillan May 2016 #60

I'm not asking you to. Barack_America May 2016 #64

Breitbart, and no shame Cary May 2016 #61

How much time do you spend swimming in Breitbart, searching for river monsters to bring back here? pnwmom May 2016 #69

Oh for fucks sake Loki May 2016 #70

Swimming in the Breitbart sewer Demsrule86 May 2016 #72