2016 Postmortem

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)

26. Wanting participation and representation is sort of where we started in 1492.

Reply to cali (Original post)

Sun May 29, 2016, 10:25 AM

May 2016

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If Clinton supporters had a smidgen of sense.... [View all] cali May 2016 OP

Why does your side feel it can dictate to the rest of us? You intimidate people, you demand that upaloopa May 2016 #1

The self-appointed high priests of liberalism get to pronounce ... JoePhilly May 2016 #3

No one can dictate to you, you can continue to do what you do and watch Clinton lose Bjorn Against May 2016 #4

I'm not dictating anything. I'm contrasting my position cali May 2016 #6

"You represent a small part of the November electorate." pinebox May 2016 #11

Like your candidate Demsrule86 May 2016 #32

There are more than 2 running. pinebox May 2016 #71

In another thread, okasha May 2016 #47

It's because of WHY she draws Republican voters (obviously...). Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #52

Obviously. okasha May 2016 #60

Can't say I ever saw those "hosannas." Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #61

Of course you won't say that. okasha May 2016 #64

I say it because it's true. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #65

Then don't make nice. Example #3000 why party unity this cycle will be impossible riderinthestorm May 2016 #23

Well said! hrmjustin May 2016 #31

We already know why your side dictates to our side. HassleCat May 2016 #34

This. nt vintx May 2016 #36

+1 and thanks. Well said. mountain grammy May 2016 #55

Maybe you should try winning Buzz cook May 2016 #58

It would be nice. HassleCat May 2016 #62

And when not having our votes causes your candidate to lose jeff47 May 2016 #41

No. YOUR side has been dictating Bernie's demise since before Iowa. Fawke Em May 2016 #42

"70-80 percent of 30 percent of the electorate doesn't win elections." vintx May 2016 #49

wrong. clinton supporters could be gracious hopemountain May 2016 #59

Careful up on that high horse ... you'll get a nose bleed. JoePhilly May 2016 #2

This. Yes. Thank you! NurseJackie May 2016 #9

I wrote that in 2008. cali May 2016 #12

I don't see the same insult in the original. JoePhilly May 2016 #19

This is very interesting. MineralMan May 2016 #5

And in 2008, the attacks on Obama from Clinton supporters here cali May 2016 #7

Attacks on Bernie and his supporters have been nonstop Bjorn Against May 2016 #10

I assume that all thinking people will understand that MineralMan May 2016 #15

I will vote for a candidate who I can trust Bjorn Against May 2016 #21

OK. Then you will probably not play a role in the November decision, really. MineralMan May 2016 #25

Yes, I am aware that people like you are looking forward to tearing the party in half Bjorn Against May 2016 #37

The New Dems have been triangulating this party towards the right for decades now. vintx May 2016 #50

You won't get banned if you end the indiscriminate Hillary Hate. yallerdawg May 2016 #51

Accusing me of "indiscriminate Hillary hate" proves you don't want my vote Bjorn Against May 2016 #63

The thing is... yallerdawg May 2016 #68

So you're going Nader. Enjoy your purity geek tragedy May 2016 #29

Really? Demsrule86 May 2016 #33

My vote is my vote, it is not your vote Bjorn Against May 2016 #38

Thinking people realize that both are horrible for the average American. Fawke Em May 2016 #43

A no true scotsman argument and massive over the top hyperbole mythology May 2016 #53

+1000, MineralMan Hortensis May 2016 #44

oops. sorry bjorn - reply to wrong poster.... hopemountain May 2016 #56

It's a 2 way street MM pinebox May 2016 #13

You've not seen me saying any of those things. MineralMan May 2016 #18

No I know you wouldn't pinebox May 2016 #22

DMX, chairs and bottles thrown and those photos? Not Bernie! Bluenorthwest May 2016 #16

Look back. Did I say anything about chairs? MineralMan May 2016 #20

It's up to the candidates; the fan base on both sides follows their lead BeyondGeography May 2016 #8

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #14

And that makes you on Trumps team Demsrule86 May 2016 #35

The Kochtopus and Heritage Foundation team that Hortensis May 2016 #45

What is up with the Sanders campaign self-righteousness? nt asuhornets May 2016 #17

You sure do spend a lot of time lecturing Clinton supports. seabeyond May 2016 #24

Wanting participation and representation is sort of where we started in 1492. oldandhappy May 2016 #26

After constant vicious attacks, the losing candidate's supporters must lay down digital arms first. Trust Buster May 2016 #27

Be the change you want to see nt geek tragedy May 2016 #28

Relax, cali, she's got this! vintx May 2016 #30

Here we go, digging way back to 2008 to try to prove a point (whatever it is) here in 2016. George II May 2016 #39

Will Sanders be a gracious loser like Hillary was in 2008? His supporters sure are out of control. Metric System May 2016 #40

some hillarious posts by me on that thread. woolldog May 2016 #46

You're stupid. Be nice. NCTraveler May 2016 #48

they aren't that confident. grasswire May 2016 #54

Nope Cali bravenak May 2016 #57

It's clear that the Clinton bashing *far* outweighs the Sanders bashing. Garrett78 May 2016 #66

Agreed bravenak May 2016 #70

...they wouldn't be Clinton supporters. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #67

Its just "primary election talk" jamese777 May 2016 #69