Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(1,446 posts)

8. If she had voted no, she would not have been re-elected to the Senate by New Yorkers.

Sun May 29, 2016, 12:54 PM

May 2016

At the very least, the repubs would have been angered enough to put up a higher profile candidate and been more motivated to beat her.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

While the majority of Democrats in both houses did indeed vote merrily May 2016 #1

Voting motivations differ. You sound logical. senz May 2016 #2

It's all part and parcel of the same attitude, whatever it takes Fumesucker May 2016 #3

I think- objectively looking at it- a recurrent problem she seems to have had Warren DeMontague May 2016 #5

Yeah? Demsrule86 May 2016 #6

There was a logical connection between 9-11 and Afghanistan. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #11

So it was worth it? senz May 2016 #10

That SOS appointment was a terrible, terrible mistake. senz May 2016 #13