2016 Postmortem

onenote

(45,929 posts)

66. Maybe you should read the transcript if you want to know something

Reply to Ash_F (Reply #14)

Wed Jun 1, 2016, 07:49 AM

Jun 2016

instead of engaging in uninformed speculation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: HILLARY AIDE REFUSES TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT EMAIL [View all] Halliburton May 2016 OP

If true,this is a holy shit moment. wendylaroux May 2016 #1

You mean like, "Holy Shit...we're blowing this way of proportion?" nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #36

I don't think so anymore. wendylaroux May 2016 #50

And in F'ING CAPS!!!! That proves that this is series Sheepshank May 2016 #54

Lawyer client privilege is now some reason to go into shock MattP May 2016 #2

Ask John Dean. gordianot May 2016 #7

Has the Daily Mail been a pro-Clinton outfit? Ash_F May 2016 #3

rightwing UK tabloid nt geek tragedy May 2016 #5

Daily Beast is the one. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #6

Daily Mail leans right emulatorloo May 2016 #11

The Daily Mail not only leans right. It is also a seedy and sensationalist tabloid. barrow-wight May 2016 #27

You'll get no arguments from me emulatorloo May 2016 #28

I just don't know how that qualifies as news. barrow-wight May 2016 #29

Better source and story here: emulatorloo May 2016 #37

Yeah. barrow-wight May 2016 #39

yes, but the case is supervised by a federal judge appointed by Clinton. grasswire May 2016 #51

Of course. I am answering Amy's question about whether Daily Mail was pro-Clinton emulatorloo May 2016 #52

Mills has no grounds to claim Attorney Client Privilege berni_mccoy May 2016 #4

Why not? I admit it looks very convenient for her, but if she was the attorney then it should be ok JonLeibowitz May 2016 #9

Crime-fraud exception berni_mccoy May 2016 #15

Mill became one of Hillary's attorneys after hillary left the state dept... 4139 May 2016 #12

Mills is likely involved in the cover up. Crime-fraud exception. berni_mccoy May 2016 #16

She did refuse to be interview by State's IG = guilty 4139 May 2016 #20

Cover up of what? annavictorious May 2016 #21

What is the crime? Cicada May 2016 #31

I don't think that's a rule Sheepshank May 2016 #18

co conspirators cannot claim atty client privilege. grasswire May 2016 #56

And your expertise in this area is based on what? onenote Jun 2016 #65

Good. seabeyond May 2016 #8

Its not ecven a goverment deposition.... Historic NY May 2016 #10

I know. annavictorious May 2016 #23

This is really starting to stink bad ... nt Jarqui May 2016 #13

Yeah, but the BS cheerleaders are going to put up sewage OP after sewage OP, until the 16th n/t SFnomad May 2016 #19

Sewage is EXACTLY what the $Hillary Campaign has been SPEWING...Lie after Lie after LIE. AzDar May 2016 #45

Just more sour grapes ... maybe your candidate should have been better prepared instead of making SFnomad May 2016 #46

Yes, because BERNIE caused Hillary to set up an unsecure, possibly ILLEGAL server and LIE about it. AzDar May 2016 #47

I can't wait until this place won't sound like Free Republic, Red State, etc. any more n/t SFnomad May 2016 #48

Truth hurts... Gotta be tough though : defending the indefensible. AzDar May 2016 #57

I don't much hear of the truth coming from BS cheerleaders around here SFnomad May 2016 #60

I agree annavictorious May 2016 #24

I've followed this some and I'm not ready to shoot the messenger this time Jarqui May 2016 #33

Interesting. I wonder if that is why she became Clinton's lawyer. Ash_F May 2016 #14

Maybe you should read the transcript if you want to know something onenote Jun 2016 #66

K&R for the people's right to know. senz May 2016 #17

That is surprising! Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #22

She has no ideal where the email thingy came from Mnpaul May 2016 #49

She sent over 300 emails, did she never see the address? Downwinder May 2016 #25

Exactly /nt trudyco May 2016 #44

So she didn't notice the address she was emailing didn't have a .gov at the end... onecaliberal May 2016 #26

And when the server was down after Sandy? Chief of staff not involved? Barack_America May 2016 #30

Nothing her or her aides or surrogates say is believable IMO. onecaliberal May 2016 #35

Perjurers now. Barack_America May 2016 #38

It's just beyond the pale. onecaliberal May 2016 #43

They've gone Full Nixon. grasswire May 2016 #58

My meter doesn't seem to be registering... Tarc May 2016 #32

Move along everybody. Nothing to see here. senz May 2016 #34

The voters have been looking for many months now Tarc May 2016 #41

Oh is that why her approval numbers are so low & unlikeabilty so high? senz May 2016 #42

Wow, that's terrible news, since opinion polls determine election winn... Tarc May 2016 #59

The MSM, the corrupt corporate media that adores Hill senz May 2016 #61

Oh, you're complaining about a news blackout now? Tarc Jun 2016 #64

We wouldn't expect it to, dear. sibelian Jun 2016 #67

3023373 votes, 270 pledged delegates. "Dear". Tarc Jun 2016 #68

Is that one of those cannabis cigarettes I see you smoking? sibelian Jun 2016 #69

I don't think I've smoked since college, so, 2002 or so. Tarc Jun 2016 #70

When Judicial Watch becomes the heroes of the Bernie movement ... barrow-wight May 2016 #40

We're a long way from the little birdie thing aren't we? CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #53

so what? tia uponit7771 May 2016 #55

This BROKE weeks ago. okasha May 2016 #62

No. Weeks ago, Mills was dodging the FBI's questions. winter is coming May 2016 #63