Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
17. Excellent post Ida, thank you
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jun 2016

I'm of the same mind. Personally, I don't expect an indictment, not ever.

But I'm no psychic, I'm just looking at stuff like Fitzmas and countless other instances of corruption and nefarious machinations throughout our entire history which went unnoticed by the press or the justice dept, and yet there it is in countless history books.

(DNA origins of Tammany Hall began before we were officially, USA)

My sense there is a very dangerous shell game in play, only to be revealed at some point after the primaries.

In the meantime, I won't be reading anything stating: "FBI WILL be bringing charges or indictments any day now, or sometime soon"


Only if, FBI HAS handed over an indictment. Grand Jury Subpoena or other procedures, will I read, if from credible source.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K N R-ed Faux pas Jun 2016 #1
Hate to break it to you, but you don't get RICO for an email server. YouDig Jun 2016 #2
I hate to break it to you, it isn't as simple as your mind. morningfog Jun 2016 #3
This scscholar Jun 2016 #4
Hate to say this but you have just been running around all 7wo7rees Jun 2016 #6
I think the RICO speculation is about the Clinton Foundation, and the appearance Blue Meany Jun 2016 #9
For some time have believed email issue is distraction for/from 7wo7rees Jun 2016 #5
I copied his links and spent some IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #11
You may very well be on to something. amandabeech Jun 2016 #7
So are you saying the guy (Crazy Frank) isn't credible WhiteTara Jun 2016 #8
His "conclusions" are speculation/not IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #12
I wouldn't be surprised if WhiteTara Jun 2016 #13
Talk to me when the FBI and DOJ get involved. IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #18
If diGenova is to be believed the FBI are involved WhiteTara Jun 2016 #19
I get to unveil a new image a friend created, laugh my ass off !!! DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #10
LOVE it!! Kinda fits in with the unicorns riversedge Jun 2016 #21
The other one with the man was kind of offensive. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #23
I missed that one. but that is ok. See enough offensive stuff. riversedge Jun 2016 #24
It will be even funnier once the FBI issues their recommendation to indict! frylock Jun 2016 #25
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #14
The Sanders camp is doubling down on the Emailgate antics today, I see Tarc Jun 2016 #15
VERY nicely torn apart, Ida! VulgarPoet Jun 2016 #16
Excellent post Ida, thank you 2banon Jun 2016 #17
Email conspiracy theorists on a rampage today Dem2 Jun 2016 #20
You continue to overlook the fact that the Clinton Foundation is a PUBLIC charity. randome Jun 2016 #22
K&R COLGATE4 Jun 2016 #26
Bogus story... beachbumbob Jun 2016 #27
So how does someone go from broke to fabulously libdem4life Jun 2016 #28
To be fair, 16 years. Maybe that was the topic of the "inspirational talks" IdaBriggs Jun 2016 #29
Facts are a lot like math realmirage Jun 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Two Problems with the Hil...»Reply #17