Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She proudly stands for pretty much everything I am against - war and fracking and the TPP and the djean111 Jun 2016 #1
i suspect trump stands even firther away from what you support...think how happy you be with him... beachbum bob Jun 2016 #2
6 of one. basselope Jun 2016 #20
Clinton has never metroins Jun 2016 #23
6 of one. basselope Jun 2016 #27
this 840high Jun 2016 #70
+1000000 azmom Jun 2016 #77
Exactly. n/t 99Forever Jun 2016 #87
metroins—Hillary Clinton voted for the U.S. to go to war in Iraq. CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #29
I was following the news then metroins Jun 2016 #30
You "don't think going in wasn't the bad idea; ..." pangaia Jun 2016 #54
We don't have to argue the Iraq war metroins Jun 2016 #57
"Bush lied, but at the time I didn't know it so I supported the vote." pangaia Jun 2016 #73
How come most of us knew? basselope Jun 2016 #75
basselope—Didn’t Hillary say the Iraq War was “a business opportunity?” CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #82
Oh dear god.. did she? basselope Jun 2016 #88
metroins—Your support of Hillary explains why you’d prefer… CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #85
Yep, kick their ass and take their gas Fumesucker Jun 2016 #86
Are you against Merrick Garland? (eom) StevieM Jun 2016 #79
At some point on Tuesday Clinton will have what she already has... HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #3
difference being there will be no more states voting, so the it will be geek tragedy Jun 2016 #9
they've been "pivoting" since before NY...just propaganda Jack Bone Jun 2016 #4
rules don't count when clinton is involved, thanks for clarifying Viva_La_Revolution Jun 2016 #5
Exactly. Popular vote count doesn't matter. A majority of delegates doesn't matter. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #11
...and the GE doesn't matter lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #16
I can't make sense of your thoughts here. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #21
I am saying that moving to the GE with a damaged candidate would be a bad choice lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #24
That really doesn't make any sense at all. Have at it with that argument. lol. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #25
"LOL" - (adj.) lahl - backed into a rhetorical corner; got nothin'. syn: ROFL lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #26
How is that a "rule". You said "rules don't matter" How so? lunamagica Jun 2016 #36
You must have been reading another post. I didn't say anything like that. lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #41
Yes, I had you confused with somebody else. My apologies lunamagica Jun 2016 #49
What a lot of Hillary supporters will see from Bernie supporters pinebox Jun 2016 #6
Those women are not going to show up to vote against the "blood coming out of her wherever" guy, Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #15
Nope, in 45 states that are not battleground nadinbrzezinski Jun 2016 #22
You are sadly mistaken pinebox Jun 2016 #33
"First female president" vs. "Blood coming out of her wherever". Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #34
Wow..I think there's much more to this than that shallow analysis. Damn!! haikugal Jun 2016 #37
In a country where Reagan won 49 states because of his sunny optimism, Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #38
Perhaps but this forum is supposed to be THE place for democratic political junkies...at least it haikugal Jun 2016 #39
Part of being a political junkie Nye Bevan Jun 2016 #40
People are aware of the problems they face in daily life and believe me when I say their eyes have haikugal Jun 2016 #42
Nye Bevan—If Hillary is next POTUS, will you pray for more free trade? CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #83
The problem is not women SheenaR Jun 2016 #46
Don't go away angry...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #44
Ya gotta love Weaver's obstinance, if you think obstinance is a virtue. nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #7
Benenson is right. It's painfully obvious that he's right geek tragedy Jun 2016 #8
I guess Hillary dumping campaign cash in California TV ads is an accounting error. Is this the first Vote2016 Jun 2016 #10
13 days nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #12
They've been saying that since before the first votes. lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #13
This will be effectiely over the evening of June 7th, yes Tarc Jun 2016 #14
Those Clinton Advisors are known to be such truth-tellers. HUGE sarcasm Skwmom Jun 2016 #17
They've been saying that since before Iowa Bettie Jun 2016 #18
He probably also said that 1+1=2. YouDig Jun 2016 #19
portlander23—Jeff Weaver is correct. CobaltBlue Jun 2016 #28
She doesn't have shit until she is voted the nominee at the convention. Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #31
Superdelegates don't get to vote until July. Optimism Jun 2016 #32
So, I wonder if there is any possible way to know which direction they are leaning before July? anotherproletariat Jun 2016 #35
Yes, allowing Trump the WH will be just what FDR would want WhiteTara Jun 2016 #81
Top Clinton Advisor is right...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #43
So the fix is in, no big surprise there! B Calm Jun 2016 #45
lol, "Bernie didn't win, which means it's rigged" nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #47
Yep, it was rigged from the get-go. Examples: B Calm Jun 2016 #50
he lost the voting nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #52
Gee, I wonder why. . B Calm Jun 2016 #53
because more people voted for Hillary nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #55
Keep believing she didn't have a huge advantage from the get-go. B Calm Jun 2016 #56
she had several advantages, so what? that's why candidates win elections, geek tragedy Jun 2016 #62
So what, omg. The super delegates voting against the voters in their states, so what! B Calm Jun 2016 #63
if the superdelegates split their votes 50/50, Clinton is still the nominee. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #64
But they're not splitting their votes, so that is a false picture. B Calm Jun 2016 #65
Bernie lost, there's no way possible one can slice and dice the numbers geek tragedy Jun 2016 #66
and now you know why. B Calm Jun 2016 #78
Well, if a top Clinton advisor says than it must be so! No need for a convention! imagine2015 Jun 2016 #48
I wonder why people think she doesn't care about rules or laws... Oh wait. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #51
But she will have 2383 Buzz cook Jun 2016 #60
You are counting supers. F- B Calm Jun 2016 #61
2383 includes super delegates Buzz cook Jun 2016 #68
It's not for him to say. Hillary's surrogates are harming her big time. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #58
Top Sanders Advisor says it's not over! DebDoo Jun 2016 #59
As do California voters! Maedhros Jun 2016 #80
Then why are they campaigning in California? lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #67
yep 840high Jun 2016 #71
Media will call it MFM008 Jun 2016 #69
And there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #72
i wouldn't associate the inabliity to grasp reality with being on the left geek tragedy Jun 2016 #74
Weaver again says Bernie doesn't have to follow pecedent. What a jerk. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #76
Much of what the Clinton Campaign spews is bullshit... this included. AzDar Jun 2016 #84
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Top Clinton Advisor Says ...»Reply #14