Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed Jun 2016 OP
Link? WhiteTara Jun 2016 #1
Horse Manure OKNancy Jun 2016 #2
Ok, Nancy. Joob Jun 2016 #54
confirmed MFM008 Jun 2016 #3
I do. If she is indicted its criminal, not civil. She will have to surrender to arrest, get books an roguevalley Jun 2016 #44
Nothing surprises me when it comes to Hillary's disregard for security protocol... obviously unqualified to conduct foreign policy. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #4
really, now: billymike Jun 2016 #5
Wow...She "broke rules"...n/t Henhouse Jun 2016 #6
I don't see anything "confirmed" in the OP; just a regurgitation of 2 weeks' worth of talking points Tarc Jun 2016 #7
Nothing is "confirmed" about all the posts today about Bernie's expenditures, so I trust you will merrily Jun 2016 #8
Being wrong is not a crime Tarc Jun 2016 #10
"Vote for me I made a mistake, I made a mistake , I will always make mistakes , so what" bahrbearian Jun 2016 #11
Don't hold your breath. nt Chezboo Jun 2016 #12
Try addressing what I actually posted, instead of "refuting" something I did not post merrily Jun 2016 #13
You posted som off-toic bellyaching about campaign expenditures, then said Tarc Jun 2016 #15
Again, try addressing what I posted. merrily Jun 2016 #17
I did address it Tarc Jun 2016 #29
Mischaracterizing what I posted is not addressing it. If you have nothing to say in response to what merrily Jun 2016 #32
Let's see... Tarc Jun 2016 #35
Repeating your mischaracterization and straw man responses is supposed to do what, exactly? merrily Jun 2016 #36
I don't understand why you continue to commit this fraud, but you do what do you, brah Tarc Jun 2016 #39
Yes, but mishandling classified information is a felony leveymg Jun 2016 #21
Material classified after the fact cannot be mishandled Tarc Jun 2016 #30
Incorrect. Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #49
That's not how it works. annavictorious Jun 2016 #53
Voting to invade the wrong country was a crime against humanity. pangaia Jun 2016 #27
Her iraq War vote alone should have disqualified her. Same for her foreign policy. merrily Jun 2016 #38
Any other cabinet level official has done the same Zambero Jun 2016 #9
Wrong. She is the only one to route State emails through her personal, private server Autumn Jun 2016 #14
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #16
I read the report, in my opinion it seems obvious to me that's why she did it. Autumn Jun 2016 #19
"...in my opinion..." Tarc Jun 2016 #31
It's my opinion. I'm sure you have one too. Autumn Jun 2016 #33
Seems highly likely. We know the one device excuse was false. merrily Jun 2016 #40
And weren't concerned people told never to speak of her personal email server again? Autumn Jun 2016 #46
Obviously, they thought it was wrong. Who am I to argue with Secretary Clinton, a trained attorney merrily Jun 2016 #50
At least she didn't 'shred the constitution' LOL!!! floppyboo Jun 2016 #24
OMG merrily Jun 2016 #41
I was considering starting an new OP with this floppyboo Jun 2016 #47
I think you should. Start it in the Sanders Group if you wish, but please do start it. merrily Jun 2016 #48
done floppyboo Jun 2016 #51
Great. merrily Jun 2016 #52
Yes, all videos are VRWC. Now, what was the question? LOL. libdem4life Jun 2016 #55
This excuse is getting old JesterCS Jun 2016 #20
Yet other State Dept. officials also broke the rules. randome Jun 2016 #25
Did they? Which rules about emails were in place for Albright, Powell and Rice? merrily Jun 2016 #42
It's not as if they're going for accuracy here. They less attention they pay, the merrily Jun 2016 #43
Former CIA Directors Petraeus and Deutch were both charged under Sec. 793 leveymg Jun 2016 #23
Deutch was not prosecuted and Petraeus knowingly gave away classified material. randome Jun 2016 #26
LOL ... this silly OP is the best you can do? JoePhilly Jun 2016 #18
She can do no wrong according to Hillary supporters jfern Jun 2016 #22
will you people get off it already.... chillfactor Jun 2016 #28
Yes she did, the report made that clear. Autumn Jun 2016 #34
Link to your source please... MineralMan Jun 2016 #37
the essential question here.... billymike Jun 2016 #45
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Post removed»Reply #2