Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
27. Nobody's listening, Dad.
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 02:10 PM
Jun 2016

The fears you cite are invalid.

Bernie has nothing to lose. He is the head of a movement that is greater than the Third Way; a coalition of progressives and independents. The political landscape has changed. HRC may prevail through this rigged election, but she will be the last Third Way to gain the WH, and will likely be impeached within weeks.

You are simply on the wrong side of history. The old rules are failing to control the surge.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He is desperately trying to save lives. Give him a break. Vattel Jun 2016 #1
Oh my! :-P NurseJackie Jun 2016 #6
Omfg. You should send this to sanders campaign hq Warren Stupidity Jun 2016 #2
Why? Bernie already knows it. MineralMan Jun 2016 #7
I'm certain he will give your implied threats the attention they deserve tularetom Jun 2016 #3
He will never see what I wrote. MineralMan Jun 2016 #5
Alas, it is so, and more's the pity tularetom Jun 2016 #17
Gosh, did I use those words without realizing it? MineralMan Jun 2016 #19
There you go, being all literal again tularetom Jun 2016 #25
I'm a literal kind of guy. MineralMan Jun 2016 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author tularetom Jun 2016 #24
Obvious? Not obvious. Too much mass media and New Dem brainwashing. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #4
An RT video? MineralMan Jun 2016 #10
Too funny, too true? Get your news from the kind of mass media Bill Cllinton paved the way for? highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #34
Bernie doesn't read DU. Why don't you send him a letter? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #8
Why would I do that? This wasn't a letter. MineralMan Jun 2016 #9
Well, you seemed to be addresing it to him. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #11
No, actually I didn't. I referred to him in the third person throughout. MineralMan Jun 2016 #13
Good grief: 'Think about it, Bernie. Help us elect a Democratic President in November.' nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #14
Vocative case. MineralMan Jun 2016 #16
It doesn't look like vocative case to me. It looks like you are addressing Bernie. nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #18
Well, English doesn't use a different noun form for the vocative MineralMan Jun 2016 #20
For the love of a duck, why not just have said 'Bernie should' instead of 'Bernie,'? nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #22
I did do that in several places in the post. MineralMan Jun 2016 #23
So, our highly ethical Democratic senators are going to indulge in petulance? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #12
Petulance? Not at all. Disapproval of MineralMan Jun 2016 #15
The will of the voters? Will the voters approve of senators acting like vengeful adolescents? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #21
yes, this scolding in the OP reveals... grasswire Jun 2016 #28
"Taking it to the convention" is not the same thing as running for president. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #30
So what? How would that interfere with him being a senator and doing his job after the election? Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #36
I'm not even getting what you're arguing. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #37
The OP talked about shunning and removing him from committess. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #38
Yes, committee assignments are favors. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #43
So, our government is run on the basis of "favors", "revenge", and "rewards". Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2016 #44
Nobody's listening, Dad. grasswire Jun 2016 #27
More's the pity. MineralMan Jun 2016 #29
you may see more history made than you want to. grasswire Jun 2016 #31
I have already seen far more history made than I wanted to. MineralMan Jun 2016 #39
Didn't you see enough of it when you were a member over there... grasswire Jun 2016 #47
No, "the possibility of HRC being indicted" is nonexistent. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #46
Bernie losing doesn't mean the election was rigged, just that most voters don't want him. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #45
Shorter... Help us elect a *Progressive/Liberal President in November, Do the right thing. HumanityExperiment Jun 2016 #32
"His Senate colleagues are very likely to simply ignore him". . . . Jake Stern Jun 2016 #33
I think he will suspend his campaign after Tuesday's results oberliner Jun 2016 #35
Yes, I do, too. He may wait until after DC votes, though, MineralMan Jun 2016 #41
He should lose his committee assignments. We've got Democrats who need the experience and exposure BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #40
If he's smart, that won't happen, and he'll continue to be MineralMan Jun 2016 #42
Hillary will just have to cool it until the correct time Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #48
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Something for Bernie Sand...»Reply #27