Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Charity Watch give Clinton Foundation an A rating. Henhouse Jun 2016 #1
Gimme Tax Shelter Octafish Jun 2016 #4
Enough said... Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #22
Seems bizarre to me that doing charible work itself instead of farming out to others is "atypical." Lord Magus Jun 2016 #38
talking point nt grasswire Jun 2016 #48
No, reality. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #57
+1 Duval Jun 2016 #151
Charity Watch's ratings are based on very specific Cal Carpenter Jun 2016 #12
odd enid602 Jun 2016 #81
very considerable one, yet take a look at Haiti larkrake Jun 2016 #94
I think Sanders, like me Cal Carpenter Jun 2016 #112
justice enid602 Jun 2016 #149
and can be bought, its not a govt agency larkrake Jun 2016 #91
A for welcoming money from dictatorships? imagine2015 Jun 2016 #30
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #35
...with human rights violations! grasswire Jun 2016 #49
To do good work around the world. Bernie hates charities and is on record as being against them... Walk away Jun 2016 #58
Yes, he said "I don't believe in charities" pandr32 Jun 2016 #79
he did give to charity according to the tax return he released larkrake Jun 2016 #82
One year....I am guessing that's one of the many reasons he is hiding his returns... Walk away Jun 2016 #104
one is enough for someone who doesnt invest or make millions, no one in DC calls him corrupt larkrake Jun 2016 #144
Is one enough for the man who just illegally spent $600,000.00 on a trip to stalk the Pope... Walk away Jun 2016 #148
So he claimed it pandr32 Jun 2016 #122
well thats an outright lie, look at his tax return larkrake Jun 2016 #98
"We are the world", remember. Dictatorships have people to care for too. Jitter65 Jun 2016 #155
It's a great way to do good and make a buck at the same time. Ask Frank Giustra and George W Bush. Octafish Jun 2016 #2
You go, Octafish! snot Jun 2016 #54
It's over. Give up the attacks. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #3
Are you as sad as I am to see him to see him reduced to these petty attacks? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #6
How the mighty have fallen... Henhouse Jun 2016 #19
Interesting point. His internals must be dismal. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #20
"...desperate last ditch effort....", indeed. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #25
I guess parachuting in to a rally was a bit to risky...n/t Henhouse Jun 2016 #28
The Clinton Foundation is under investigation. panader0 Jun 2016 #137
There is no proof the FBI is investigating the Clinton Foundation DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #138
What You Consider Attacks Are Necessary IF There Is To Be ANY Semblance Of DEMOCRACY! TRUTH CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #11
Lying is OK. Nixon did it. reddread Jun 2016 #33
bernie does it too puffy socks Jun 2016 #67
Foreign Sources? Do tell. Links, help. That's a new one for me. libdem4life Jun 2016 #69
here you go puffy socks Jun 2016 #76
i don't see a source. I know there have been problems with campaign libdem4life Jun 2016 #83
sorry puffy socks Jun 2016 #95
No I really didn't know that. However, link notwithstanding, libdem4life Jun 2016 #99
You may not care about sources.. choie Jun 2016 #107
Now how did I suspect that? Thanks for the added info. libdem4life Jun 2016 #115
I have not heard a lie from his lips, please inform me of one larkrake Jun 2016 #100
Take out the ear plugs puffy socks Jun 2016 #126
I dont see a single lie here. retired politicians are still politicians-and Hill wants to return larkrake Jun 2016 #140
of course you dont puffy socks Jun 2016 #145
Senator Sanders liberal from boston Jun 2016 #143
thank you liberal larkrake Jun 2016 #146
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Ya know. libdem4life Jun 2016 #73
He needs to be introduced to a comb KingFlorez Jun 2016 #5
She needs to be introduced to a lie detector. JudyM Jun 2016 #16
See VIDEO Above! CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #18
! nc4bo Jun 2016 #56
When you are balding your hair looks nicer if you keep it short. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #23
Can you imagine if we were criticizing Hillarys hair and appearance? JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #62
You can criticize her appearance if you want. You are free to speak freely. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #65
Point is it would be called sexist. Your old man has nothing to do with it. JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #84
And him and I would defend your right to be a sexist. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #87
But it isn't sexist to make fun of an older man for being balding and having unkempt hair? JonLeibowitz Jun 2016 #97
No Haveadream Jun 2016 #154
That's one thing I remember...it was ugly...those who critized...as it libdem4life Jun 2016 #68
I have a feeling the Foundation is going to be in the news quite a bit now. Skink Jun 2016 #7
FOUNDATION "NEWS" AND INSIGHTS IS FORTHCOMING I BELIEVE... IT WILL BE INCREASINGLY... CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #14
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #44
Assault the font so as to miss the message. nc4bo Jun 2016 #59
There was no message in the post to which I replied. Only hyperbolic shouting. randome Jun 2016 #60
so what? larkrake Jun 2016 #101
Yes, let them compare the Clinton Foundation TexasTowelie Jun 2016 #55
Republicans are expected to be scoundrels, Democrats are expected to be better than that. nc4bo Jun 2016 #61
Two wrongs dont make a right larkrake Jun 2016 #102
Do you think that Trump is going to attack the Clinton Foundation TexasTowelie Jun 2016 #116
Yes he will, the madman thinks he is invincible- dont credit him with common sense larkrake Jun 2016 #120
Then he is playing with fire TexasTowelie Jun 2016 #128
Donald is a master at planting seeds of doubt and so far she has had no defence larkrake Jun 2016 #130
and I suspect that Sanders is VERY aware of the .. grasswire Jun 2016 #52
It's not a review. KULawHawk Jun 2016 #66
Yeah, Hillary tried that one and got it slapped down post haste libdem4life Jun 2016 #74
yes, her silence on the subject is very telling, but the Repugs have real meat here and will use it larkrake Jun 2016 #89
Kickin' Faux pas Jun 2016 #8
He is regurgitating lines from "clinton cash" boston bean Jun 2016 #9
Where can I find information about this debunking? I don't have the book libdem4life Jun 2016 #75
Really? who debunked it? larkrake Jun 2016 #103
If it was "much debunked" surely there is one credible source, libdem4life Jun 2016 #129
The author had to remove many false accusations for the Kindle edition. boston bean Jun 2016 #139
Kindle reminds me of book banners, they just cannot tolerate disturbing truths larkrake Jun 2016 #141
Yeah, I can tell you are interested in the truth. boston bean Jun 2016 #142
"Assails" is a bit of a strong term... HerbChestnut Jun 2016 #10
they have resorted to exaggerating everything and they have to feel a little larkrake Jun 2016 #105
Way to go Bernie, attack a great philanthropic org for political gain. JERK nt BootinUp Jun 2016 #13
The Charity That Engages In Money Laundering... The Money Laudering Operation That Occassionally CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #17
TRANSPARENCY. You wouldn't know about the contributors unless CLINTON FOUNDATION released it. BootinUp Jun 2016 #34
Well, there was this one...from a Canadian Money Repurposing source... libdem4life Jun 2016 #78
More Fox News smears getting repeated on DU. Sickening. -nt- Lord Magus Jun 2016 #36
He's going to attack ... Tortmaster Jun 2016 #32
The Carter derision has already been done. Decades ago. libdem4life Jun 2016 #93
HA! take foot from mouth larkrake Jun 2016 #106
See, gutter. Castro, Russia? Using where they get funds to help people as an attack. seabeyond Jun 2016 #15
Desperation is an ugly thing. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #21
You hit the nail on the head underthematrix Jun 2016 #26
So why the constant derision, attacks, hating on "the loser"? libdem4life Jun 2016 #96
The Foundation will prove to be very dangerous waters for Hillary Arazi Jun 2016 #24
Wash, rinse, repeat..... Henhouse Jun 2016 #31
Nah, FBI investigators aren't RW puppets. Arazi Jun 2016 #39
This involves foreign donators, so would involve the CIA, and FBI, and Justice system larkrake Jun 2016 #136
Oh well, that settles it. Oh, they were fabulously wealthy by that time. libdem4life Jun 2016 #71
follow the money, Im sure Donna is just getting a salary larkrake Jun 2016 #108
Yes, it was thought so at the beginning and has proven to be so. libdem4life Jun 2016 #41
I didn't entirely get it until I read Paul Thompson's timeline. Arazi Jun 2016 #47
Inconvenient facts. Got to keep them hidden and out of the hands libdem4life Jun 2016 #64
It all stinks and there is a cover-up larkrake Jun 2016 #127
Im afraid you are absolutely right larkrake Jun 2016 #109
Pathetic and desperate. sufrommich Jun 2016 #27
Is that pic from this weekend? If so, he's looking more and more Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #29
Definitely not a Presidential look. eom BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #40
Truer words were never typed. Octafish Jun 2016 #46
I knew that I would regret venturing BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #51
Weird how it's OK to make fun of one person for his looks... Octafish Jun 2016 #85
Well, perhaps you could elucidate on what a "presidential type" looks like? libdem4life Jun 2016 #90
Camera does not lie, right. Octafish Jun 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author emulatorloo Jun 2016 #80
At best it's a huge conflict of interest. At best. Scuba Jun 2016 #37
It isn't her charity, despite it sharing her surname. It is a public charity. randome Jun 2016 #43
Bwahaaaahaaaaaaaaa. Scuba Jun 2016 #50
"Clinton Cash" -soon to be a major motion picture by Alex Jones and Peter Schweizer! randome Jun 2016 #53
Any comment on the FACTS or are you just going to attack the source? Scuba Jun 2016 #131
I'd love to see it larkrake Jun 2016 #147
that is very naive of you, and laughable larkrake Jun 2016 #110
Chelsea Clinton talks about TRANSPARENCY policies of Clinton Foundation BootinUp Jun 2016 #42
I heart Chelsea...I trust her at the helm of the Clinton Foundation...nt Henhouse Jun 2016 #63
Well then, let's hope she can keep a better rein on her husband. libdem4life Jun 2016 #113
Should Bernie keep a better rein on his wife....? Henhouse Jun 2016 #117
She ran a start up business. 80% of them fail. If you knew about libdem4life Jun 2016 #125
Chelsea doesn't care about money......She said so ! n/t MichMan Jun 2016 #72
yet she married a vulture capitalist-duh larkrake Jun 2016 #111
To carry on two shady family histories. Apple...meet ground. libdem4life Jun 2016 #121
More spaghetti thrown at the wall WhiteTara Jun 2016 #70
Yup La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #77
Says the guy who only gives 4% of his income to charity. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #86
well, he has very little income. I give $500 a year, does that make me evil? larkrake Jun 2016 #114
Little income....did you see the $13,000 a night hotel room he stayed in on his Roman holiday. Henhouse Jun 2016 #119
I've gone to club med and couldnt afford it. What has that to do with opinions on charity? larkrake Jun 2016 #123
He does not have "very little income," his adjusted 2014 income was over $200k. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #152
wow, thats a fortune in Dc life--not larkrake Jun 2016 #156
He owns a home in DC and several properties in Vermont. SunSeeker Jun 2016 #157
investments are just smart to leave to his kids I'm surprised he has money for charities larkrake Jun 2016 #158
Sanders only has one biological child... SunSeeker Jun 2016 #159
with kids larkrake Jun 2016 #160
LOL, "largely silent" my foot. He LAUNCHED his campaign the same day Clinton Cash ucrdem Jun 2016 #88
I've seen many Hill pics more frightening larkrake Jun 2016 #124
I'm afraid the FBI agrees with the "very troubling" aspect. libdem4life Jun 2016 #132
RW noise machine leaks RW noise. Rinse and repeat. ucrdem Jun 2016 #133
talking point nt grasswire Jun 2016 #134
Remember when Hillary promised Obama she would be transparent about the Clinton Foundation while she 2cannan Jun 2016 #92
bad decisions are her habit larkrake Jun 2016 #118
plus they set up another charity in Canada.. grasswire Jun 2016 #135
And I do, too. Duval Jun 2016 #150
her next scandal eom noiretextatique Jun 2016 #153
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Conflict of interest: San...»Reply #158