Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Are we STILL doing this idiotic 'supers don't vote till July' NONSENSE??? [View all]Gore1FL
(22,900 posts)62. I am just glad you are looking inside.
Sometimes progress is slow. But buck up, at least you admit to bad behavior and are endeavoring to fix it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
194 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Are we STILL doing this idiotic 'supers don't vote till July' NONSENSE??? [View all]
bravenak
Jun 2016
OP
True. But at this point in 2008, Bernie came out and endorsed President Obama and said the race was
Jitter65
Jun 2016
#10
Nope Bernie only did that when Obama had clinched the majority of pledged delegates
Vattel
Jun 2016
#28
I KNOW THAT, GAH! I'm the bomb. People save and track my posts all over the web cause they be
bravenak
Jun 2016
#36
I am just glad that you recognize your bad behavior was, in your own words, "unnecessary.
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#37
For some reason there wasn't a peep about that from Bernie Sanders in June 2008,
Nye Bevan
Jun 2016
#22
That's the official lie from the Sanders campaign - straight from the horse's mouth.
baldguy
Jun 2016
#32
If yo are so sure of the outcome why do you want to short-circuit the process? nt
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#104
Crowning would be giving the nomination to the loser. She won. She won my a huge margin
lunamagica
Jun 2016
#159
It's all they have left. They don't really have any choice. They can either accept reality...
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#34
To be honest, I could understand the motivation to some degree until it was noted that Sanders
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#49
The poster is flustered. Look at the random non sentences throughout this thread.
Gore1FL
Jun 2016
#66
The RULES state that a candidate needs to hit 2383 this cycle. She did that. He cannot do that now.
bravenak
Jun 2016
#88
Yeah, but chill. Nobody's mind will be changed at DU or other online venues. The AP should've....
Hekate
Jun 2016
#80
I know they wanted the scoop. It's just that it fits the victimy Sanders narrative so well...
Hekate
Jun 2016
#111
DNC doing a survey of all SDs June 15 according to a BS delegate in Maryland
robbedvoter
Jun 2016
#81
Spread it around to your comrades and I will totally notice and be nicey nicey
bravenak
Jun 2016
#130
Idiotic is calling a race the night before the largest state in the country votes. A shitbird move
AzDar
Jun 2016
#108
A totally idiotic process, they should only be able to commit at the convention
Logical
Jun 2016
#141
I wish people would cut the "Hillary cares about working-class women" out... but that hasn't
ScreamingMeemie
Jun 2016
#154
If they were going to swith they would have done it by now, while he vote was going on.
lunamagica
Jun 2016
#165
There are times in which your posts appear to be deliberately provocative.
SujiwanKenobee
Jun 2016
#178
Why are you posting on an op from monday just to lob an attack? It's OVER. Move on. Or dont.
bravenak
Jun 2016
#191
