2016 Postmortem

adigal

(7,581 posts)

25. You really think that?? Albright told we silly women that we had to vote for her for that reason

Reply to JoePhilly (Reply #21)

Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:41 PM

Jun 2016

and I am pretty sure a lot of women are voting for her because of gender.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So every time someone criticizes Hillary, it's sexism now. Good to know. [View all] adigal Jun 2016 OP

There it is. nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #1

Again. Sparkly Jun 2016 #27

thank you. grasswire Jun 2016 #2

It's okay to turn it off once in awhile. PepperHarlan Jun 2016 #3

No, just when she's told she had to endure a different set of rules. joshcryer Jun 2016 #4

In 2008 she wrote a letter to SD after all voting was done. TimPlo Jun 2016 #7

Of course, and that's Sanders right at well. joshcryer Jun 2016 #17

What different set of rules?? She did the same exact things Bernie is doing, except she added adigal Jun 2016 #12

Any PUMA who called for her to contest the convention was racist. joshcryer Jun 2016 #18

Well, they were also openly stating that they didn't want a black president, so... Scootaloo Jun 2016 #29

You still haven't answered the question Scootaloo Jun 2016 #35

Can't speak passionately without "yelling"... moriah Jun 2016 #42

OK, I'll give you those examples, they are sexist. But we didn't suggest that here adigal Jun 2016 #46

Only the yelling and cackling comments here, true, and those rare. moriah Jun 2016 #47

And yet manages to not get held to any standards whatsoever on anything. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #53

I don't see yelling or cackling as sexist but a personal attack pinebox Jun 2016 #56

They are not actual rules and they are arbitrary. joshcryer Jun 2016 #48

I wonder is if they think Clinton is a Racist TimPlo Jun 2016 #5

Yea, it is a failing tactic too, because it turns people off from voting for Hillary One Black Sheep Jun 2016 #6

Exactly!! Like we are too stupid to figure out that a woman might have different values than we do adigal Jun 2016 #16

zzzzzzzz. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #8

Thanks for your intelligent response!!!! So thoughtful and convincing!!! nt adigal Jun 2016 #13

Actually considering the source I think that was one his most thoughtful posts. TimPlo Jun 2016 #20

Trump is going to take that sexist label and hang it around Hillary's neck like a dead chicken. Marr Jun 2016 #9

This BlindTiresias Jun 2016 #49

So, every time we see sexism, it's not allowed to be talked about now. Good to know. Squinch Jun 2016 #10

I love when people think saying rude stuff will change minds. :) adigal Jun 2016 #14

I love it when people think saying, "I don't think that is important" will change minds. Squinch Jun 2016 #22

Right wing?? Really?? Amazing how much you can see logic. adigal Jun 2016 #33

blablablablabla. See ya. Squinch Jun 2016 #37

Thanks for the intelligent discourse!! You've convinced me!!! ;) nt adigal Jun 2016 #45

Build a straw-man, knock him over, declare victory!!!! JoePhilly Jun 2016 #11

Perhaps to you. Not to me, and why should I get over myself? Should I vote how JoePhilly wants me to adigal Jun 2016 #15

No one is voting for Hillary BECAUSE of her gender ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #21

You really think that?? Albright told we silly women that we had to vote for her for that reason adigal Jun 2016 #25

"Chicks, ya just can't trust them!!!!" JoePhilly Jun 2016 #31

Um, I'm a woman. I'm a 54 year old woman. I learned about feminist from the woman adigal Jun 2016 #34

"So every time someone criticizes Hillary, it's sexism now ... " JoePhilly Jun 2016 #39

No no, she said you were going to hell if you didn't. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #32

Oh, damn!! I had better sharpen up my pitchfork. :) nt adigal Jun 2016 #36

Who gives a shit what one person at DailyKos wrote? anigbrowl Jun 2016 #19

Cognitive dissonance AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #23

Yup. You got it. nt adigal Jun 2016 #26

No, not every time ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #24

Did I say that? No. nt adigal Jun 2016 #28

She is the presumptive nominee cynatnite Jun 2016 #30

Would you have celebrated if Sarah Palin was first female VP? History there, too. adigal Jun 2016 #38

I'm sure I wouldn't have. n/t cynatnite Jun 2016 #40

Is it sexist to say she rode her husband's coattails to the nomination? scscholar Jun 2016 #41

I wouldn't think so. Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #43

Well, has she? Because I think that if she wasn't First Lady, she wouldn't be where she is now adigal Jun 2016 #44

Oh boy! Why am I not surprised at this statement? leftofcool Jun 2016 #51

I'm a woman SheenaR Jun 2016 #50

Crooked Hillary better ft ready for trump. He's going to fry her onecaliberal Jun 2016 #52

All sexists oppose Hillary. Not everyone who opposes her is a sexist. pampango Jun 2016 #54

You sound surprised. VulgarPoet Jun 2016 #55

That comment is amazingly similar to the way Darb Jun 2016 #57

Now? Doctor_J Jun 2016 #58