Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]gordianot
(15,799 posts)70. Agreed
As to how political parties conduct themselves was correctly not addressed in the Constitution even though Primary elections are funded by public funds. That seems to be a conversation people are not ready to consider.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sore losers, bitter and paranoid to the end. Primary Bernie! Al Giordano 4 Vermont Senate
wyldwolf
Jun 2016
#2
There would have been more voters. But the percentages would be about the same as they are now.
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#4
The majority of the voting for CA in particular is mail-in, so it had a negligible effect there.
Blue_Adept
Jun 2016
#39
Not really, well over a million voted early in California alone, and that vote was pretty much the
stevenleser
Jun 2016
#24
All we Bernie supporters wanted was a fair chance in CA. "Secret win" robbed us of that...
Barack_America
Jun 2016
#7
You got a secret - a secret ballot. No caucus with 355 people showing up for an entire state.
tonyt53
Jun 2016
#52
It probably had no real effect. Everything turned out how demographics and polling indicated.
Zynx
Jun 2016
#8
No, it wouldn't have ... you would have come up with some other excuse why it wasn't "fair" n/t
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#56
His supporters didn't let him down, they were tricked by that last, epic ratfuck.
Lizzie Poppet
Jun 2016
#47
The establishment usually has a hard time recognizing the "others" accomplishments
uponit7771
Jun 2016
#31
This is one of the reason you lost so bad and you still don't get it. False accusations, whining,
seabeyond
Jun 2016
#29
Posts like this make it difficult to not be a "sore winner". For all those who criticize Hillary's…
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#48
it was razor-thin and he probably did win if the votes were accurately counted
geek tragedy
Jun 2016
#69