Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Does Hillary Clinton need Sanders voters? [View all]Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)158. It galls me to say so but probably not.
She's very fortunate in her opposition. If the Republicans were running some moderate milquetoast like Rubio she'd have something to worry about, but since they decided to run Mussolini Mk. II she benefits from the "Aw Hell Naw" effect. She'll probably be fine without us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
176 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'll be voting for her too, though I had hoped for and supported Bernie. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2016
#3
Genuine BoBs are going to vote for the non-establishment candidate no matter who it is. Most...
ChisolmTrailDem
Jun 2016
#6
The way Trump is going, he's going to scare so many Republicans that it could be possible. I think
kerry-is-my-prez
Jun 2016
#53
And Republicans with even a smidgen of sense and sanity will vote against Trump. nt
tblue37
Jun 2016
#173
Don't be so disappointed a movement is building. It would have been nice if the Democratic Party
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#168
It wasn't always this way and this place was a great respite during the Bush era.
Live and Learn
Jun 2016
#171
Then Hillary will continue to divide the Democratic Party at her own peril.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2016
#144
Obviously, malcontents can sit out - won't be me - but, why not minimize the risk of unnecessary malcontentism?! Surely, that makes the most sense.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2016
#146
I'm noticing that phrases like "this is an honest question" or "I'm just curious" are used ...
NurseJackie
Jun 2016
#44
The interesting thing is that we really don't know how many votes Clinton received in the primary.
peace13
Jun 2016
#37
Did I say "Clinton", no, I said politicians... Who is in charge of Congress right now?
glowing
Jun 2016
#163
Only the ones that are going to vote for her anyway, which is the bulk of them.
LLStarks
Jun 2016
#104
she's already got most of them except hardcore and thos pesky millennials & Indies
msongs
Jun 2016
#10
I honestly think that moderate Republicans will be voting for her as well .. she'll get my vote yes.
YOHABLO
Jun 2016
#12
She already got about 60% of them just by winning the primary. So if you're waiting for someone to
LuvLoogie
Jun 2016
#13
And yet Obama won handily. Actual Democrats end up voting for the nominee, strange as it seems.
Hekate
Jun 2016
#174
no, the 25% arent Busters, they just are anti Hillary, cant swallow that pill
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#109
Seems as Hillary and her campaign don't think so, they haven't shown much interest in Bernie voters
One Black Sheep
Jun 2016
#26
Is it just a coincidence that 50% of registered voters feel their party no longer represents
B Calm
Jun 2016
#45
He didn't even get 50% of the voters. only part were dems and only 44 of the whole
DLCWIdem
Jun 2016
#128
well, she did lip service but she also said in 7 yrs, or we "cant". I never heard policy tho
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#116
Yes, they are, and have been from the start. Plus immigration reform within 100 hunder days
lunamagica
Jun 2016
#153
no, we will see if she enacts these things, meanwhile, the real needs are not being spoken about
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#176
If you don't see a problem with a President tRump or don't feel you need to stop it ... then yeah,
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#48
FFS, the BS cheerleaders have been acting like spoiled children around here ...
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#64
And Hillary supporters have been acting more like poor winners than even the Dallas Cowboys.
hobbit709
Jun 2016
#65
You know, you're going to find out you're just as immaterial as the PUMAs were in 2008
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#67
I've voted Democrat since I was first able to in 1972, no matter how hopeless the chances
hobbit709
Jun 2016
#68
Yeah, that's what the truth looks like, sounds like you haven't heard the truth in a long while n/t
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#90
And I explained why ... but whatever, you've revealed enough of yourself ... buh bye n/t
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#94
Basing your vote for Hillary on the actions of her supporters is the most stupid thing I've ever
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#89
A Democratic candidate could win with 80% of the vote and Republicans would still try to
SFnomad
Jun 2016
#58
It helps to win the Senate and the House and the larger the win the more likely...
PoliticAverse
Jun 2016
#103
The Bernie or Busters make up a small percentage of Sanders supporters. You can't judge by
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#51
And that should tell you everything you need to know about that 22%........LOL
Trust Buster
Jun 2016
#134
I think most Sanders supporters will vote for our nominee. That's how politics works.
Lil Missy
Jun 2016
#70
depends. If Trump is the opponent, yes she can, unless she puts her foot wrong
swhisper1
Jun 2016
#101
I think at present there is more a reach for the Bush Republicans than for Sanders supporters.
EndElectoral
Jun 2016
#135
Yes, we need Sanders' supporters, just like Obama needed Hillary's supporters.
Beacool
Jun 2016
#142
we need ALL the voters....novemeber election MUST be a Crushing defeat of conservatives
beachbum bob
Jun 2016
#156